Man jailed over Hillary Clinton meme wins appeal
Joke around about Hillary, go to jail.
Indeed, it’s gotten that bad.
Except maybe when an adult steps in and rules Douglass Mackey can remain free while he appeals his case.
You may recall Mackey, also known as Ricky Vaughn, was convicted earlier this year for posting a comic meme in 2016 that told voters for Hillary Clinton to avoid lines and “Text ‘Hillary’ to 59925 Vote for Hillary and be a part of history,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York.
It was, of course, a joke.
But Democrats were not amused, and their Justice Department said with a straight face that Mackey was involved in “election interference,” and Mackey was looking at 10 years in prison after a Brooklyn, New York, jury convicted him of “conspiracy against rights.”
These are the same Democrats who weren’t joking when they used their, um, creative efforts to suppress the Hunter Biden story during the 2020 election.
In October, Mackey received a seven-month sentence in federal prison. But Monday, the U.S. Second Court of Appeals stayed his surrender date and ruled he could remain free while appealing his conviction, Just the News reported.
function ffp_getCookie(cname) { var name=cname + “=”; var decodedCookie=decodeURIComponent(document.cookie); var ca=decodedCookie.split(‘;’); for(var i=0; i
There’s a lot riding on the case, as defined by Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
What does the case of Douglass Mackey reveal about the selective application of justice based on political beliefs?
Title: Joking about Hillary Clinton: Is It a Crime?
Introduction:
In a bizarre turn of events, a man named Douglass Mackey, also known as Ricky Vaughn, found himself facing criminal charges for posting a comic meme about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. This peculiar case raises questions about the limits of free speech and the politicization of the justice system. While Mackey has recently been granted the right to appeal his conviction and remain free, it brings attention to the concerning trend of weaponizing the federal government against conservatives. This article delves into the details of the case and the broader implications it carries.
The Story Behind the Conviction:
In 2016, Douglass Mackey made a jesting post on social media, advising Clinton voters to avoid lines by texting a number to vote for her. However, Democrats did not see the humor in this comic meme. The Justice Department, with a straight face, took the matter seriously, labeling Mackey’s actions as “election interference.” A jury in Brooklyn, New York, convicted him of “conspiracy against rights,” which could lead to a 10-year prison sentence.
Selective Application of Justice:
It is ironic that the same Democrats who did not hesitate to suppress the Hunter Biden story during the 2020 election took offense to a joke made by a conservative. This double standard in applying justice raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality of our legal system. Is it acceptable to penalize individuals for their political beliefs and sense of humor?
The Weaponization of the Federal Government:
The case of Douglass Mackey highlights a broader issue regarding the weaponization of the federal government against conservatives. It appears that there is a pattern of targeting individuals with opposing views, stifling their freedom of expression through legal means. This trend is not only detrimental to political discourse but also undermines the principle of equality before the law.
A Glimmer of Hope:
Fortunately for Mackey, the U.S. Second Court of Appeals decided to stay his surrender date and allow him to remain free while he appeals his conviction. This decision provides a glimmer of hope for those concerned about the infringement of free speech rights and the increasingly partisan nature of our justice system. It remains to be seen whether justice will prevail in this case, setting a precedent for future similar situations.
Conclusion:
The bizarre case of Douglass Mackey, also known as Ricky Vaughn, and his conviction for posting a joke about Hillary Clinton in 2016 shed light on the alarming weaponization of the federal government against conservatives. This selective application of justice and infringement on free speech rights raise serious questions about the fairness and objectivity of our legal system. As the appeals process unfolds, it is crucial to reflect on the broader implications and strive for a more equitable and impartial administration of justice, irrespective of political affiliation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...