The federalist

Court rejects Democrats’ baseless challenge to Florida’s congressional map

Florida’s ⁤First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a congressional map previously signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis⁣ on Friday,‍ striking down a lower court’s ​ruling that erroneously claimed the proposal suppressed black voters.

Writing ‍ for a Florida trial court in September, Judge J. Lee Marsh declared the map “unconstitutional” based upon the false notion the map​ “diminish[ed]” black Floridians ⁣“ability‌ to elect their candidate of choice.” The order — sought by left-wing groups‍ such as​ the Black Voters Matters Capacity Building Institute and ​the League of Women Voters of Florida Education Fund —‌ further mandated the legislature ‌to redraw the proposed districts.

In its Friday ruling, however, the appeals court noted how‌ Marsh’s irrational ⁣logic reads a “racial segregation mandate” into the Florida Constitution by demanding that ​congressional districts be drawn using race as a factor.

“The constitution cannot demand that ‌all ⁣voters ⁤are treated equally without regard to race ​and at the same time demand that voters are treated differently based​ on race,”‍ the ⁢court ⁤wrote. Florida’s constitution “requires that racial⁣ and ⁤language minority voters receive⁤ an equal opportunity to participate‌ in the political process and⁤ have a non-diminished ability​ to ‍elect representatives of their choice. The trial ⁤court erred ⁣in ⁤reading a ‍racial segregation ‌mandate into⁤ the constitutional ​provision.”

“We are therefore correct⁣ to reverse the final ‌order and remand to the‍ trial court,” it⁤ added.

Similar legal reasoning was used by⁢ DeSantis, who vetoed ‍prior maps⁢ approved by ⁤the state legislature last ‍year that ‍created​ a “black minority‍ seat in North Florida.” The governor’s office‍ argued ⁤the proposal’s ‌creation of the district was gerrymandered using race ⁢as the primary factor, and therefore violated the U.S. Constitution’s equal⁣ protection⁤ clause. This prompted the GOP-controlled legislature​ to pass ‌ the ⁣newer map ‍currently being litigated in state court.

Plaintiffs plan to appeal‌ the circuit court’s ‌ruling to the Florida⁢ Supreme Court, according⁣ to ‌the ⁤ Washington Examiner.

Friday’s ⁤decision marks the⁤ second legal ‍victory‍ in recent weeks upholding ⁢election integrity ⁢measures approved by DeSantis and Florida ⁤Republicans.‍ In October, a U.S. district court judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by ⁤leftist⁣ groups falsely claiming Florida’s voter registration process violated federal law. In his ruling, Judge ‍Allen Winsor noted ‌how the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence⁤ showing that the state’s “wet-signature requirement” is “immaterial.”


Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a⁤ graduate of the University ‍of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his ‍work has ⁣been featured in numerous ⁢outlets,⁤ including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review.⁣ Follow him‍ on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood

Popular

Why did the‌ appeals court⁣ overturn the lower​ court’s ruling that claimed the map suppressed black voters?

Florida’s First Circuit Court of Appeals recently made a significant ​ruling regarding a congressional map that was previously signed by Governor Ron DeSantis. In a decision that has widespread implications, the ⁤court overturned a lower ⁣court’s ruling that wrongly claimed the map suppressed black voters.

The controversy ​began when Judge⁣ J. Lee Marsh declared ⁢the map “unconstitutional” based on the false ‍belief that it diminished the ability of‍ black Floridians to⁣ elect their preferred candidates.⁣ This ruling ⁣was sought by left-wing groups such as the Black Voters Matters Capacity Building Institute and the ‍League of‌ Women Voters of Florida Education Fund, who further demanded that the proposed​ districts be redrawn by the legislature.

However, in its ‌recent ruling, the appeals court ‌noted the irrationality of Marsh’s logic,‍ accusing⁣ him of reading⁣ a “racial segregation mandate” into ​the Florida Constitution by demanding that race be a factor in drawing congressional districts. The‍ court emphasized that the⁢ constitution requires‍ that all voters be treated equally, without regard⁢ to race, and ‌at ⁢the same time⁤ guarantees‌ that ‍racial and language minority voters have an equal opportunity to participate in‍ the‍ political‌ process and elect ‌representatives of ​their choice.

The ‌court stated, “The constitution cannot demand that all ⁢voters are treated equally ‌without regard to race and ⁢at the same time demand that ​voters are treated differently based on⁣ race. The trial court erred in reading a racial segregation mandate⁢ into the constitutional provision.”

Based on this ⁣reasoning, the court reversed the lower court’s ‍decision and remanded the case back to the trial court for further ⁢proceedings.

Interestingly, Governor DeSantis ⁤had already vetoed prior maps ⁢approved by the state legislature last⁣ year for similar reasons. ⁢He argued that those maps created ⁢a “black ‌minority seat in North Florida” through gerrymandering, which violated the U.S. Constitution’s principle of‍ equal protection.

The latest‍ ruling by the​ appeals court supports‍ the⁤ governor’s position, further highlighting the importance of fairness and equal‍ representation in ​the redistricting process. It establishes a ⁣legal precedent that disallows the use of race as the primary factor in drawing congressional districts.

This decision⁣ has significant implications for Florida’s electoral landscape and serves as a reminder of the ongoing ‌challenges ⁣and controversies surrounding redistricting. ​It ⁣emphasizes the need to uphold both the constitutional requirement of equal treatment for⁢ all voters and the guarantee of ‌representation for racial‍ and language minority communities.

As ​the⁣ case ⁤moves ‍forward, it will be​ interesting to see ​how the trial court responds to the appeals court’s ruling and what impact it will have on future ‌redistricting efforts in Florida. This decision is likely​ to ⁣shape the way redistricting is conducted in the state and​ could set a‌ precedent for other states grappling with similar issues.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker