The epoch times

August job growth came in at 187,000 new jobs, but there were also 110,000 downward revisions.

[Note: If you wish to skip detailed analysis and data support, simply scroll down to “Opinion and Outlook” and “GDP Prognostication.”]

The August Jobs Report: Revisions and Insights

The August jobs report was ⁤released this morning, showing 187,000 new ⁤jobs, ​the same⁤ as July’s initial figure. However, the July number was revised down by 30,000, continuing the trend of significant downward revisions in recent months. In fact, the revisions for ​June and July combined resulted in ⁢a ‌decrease of 110,000 jobs. The June ⁢report also had a massive downward revision of 110,000​ for April and May. Additionally, the revised​ July numbers brought down the May and June figures by another 49,000.

But let’s dive into the ⁣exclusive ​schedule of August​ and July Jobs Creation by Average Weekly Wages.

(Source: “August ​and July Jobs Creation by Average Weekly Wages‌ by Sector” The Stuyvesant Square Consultancy 2023, used‍ by ​permission)

In terms​ of job growth, we⁤ continue to see ⁣most of it in government-supported and subsidized sectors like ‍education and health‌ services, which are ​less affected by⁣ economic cycles. On the other hand, more cyclical sectors such as‍ transportation, warehousing,‌ information services, and professional ​and business services have shown declines or sluggish growth. Temporary help‌ services, which are usually a minor factor in job creation, have lost an average of ⁤26,000⁣ jobs each month for⁢ the past three​ months. This decline in temporary help services often serves‌ as an early indicator ⁣of an economic slowdown.

The unemployment​ rate rose by ‍0.3 percentage point to 3.8 percent in August, with 514,000 ​more people becoming unemployed, bringing the total ‌to‌ 6.4 million. When considering real⁣ wages adjusted for inflation, the aggregate increase was a ​mere 1.05 percent, calculated after accounting for the ‍July trimmed mean inflation rate of 4.1 percent. A detailed breakdown by sector will be provided in our next report.

Other Data Points

The Institute for Supply ‍Management’s Manufactuer’s Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) ‍for August, released ⁢this morning, showed the industrial economy is contracting, but at a slower ‍pace‍ compared to last month. The index stood at 47.6, slightly higher than July’s 46.4. (A reading below 50 signals contraction.) On the ‍other hand, the ISM Services Index for⁤ July, the latest‌ available, indicated expansion in the​ service economy, albeit at a slower rate, with a reading of⁣ 52.7 compared to June’s 53.9. (The⁢ August Services report ⁢will be⁤ released on Sept. 6.)

The Job⁢ Openings and Labor Turnover Survey‍ (JOLTS) for July, reported⁣ on Aug. 29, continued its decline, revealing 338,000 fewer job openings compared to‌ June, along with 253,000 ​fewer ⁣separations. This ongoing decline ⁢in ⁣job openings ⁤is evident ⁤in the chart below, showing ​a significant drop from the peak of 12,027,000 in March⁣ 2022 to 8,827,000 in July 2023.

(Source: “JOLTS Jobs Openings Since July 2018 to July ​2023” ⁢/ Federal Reserve‍ Bank of St. Louis)

We believe that the long-anticipated‍ recession has impacted hiring practices, resulting in fewer job ‍openings. Consequently, the predicted recession, which​ would typically lead to layoffs, might ‍instead result in a so-called “soft landing.”

Building permits in July, ‍released on Aug. 16, were at a seasonally adjusted annual ‍rate of‌ 1,442,000. This represents a 0.1 percent increase‌ from the revised⁢ June​ rate ⁣of 1,441,000 but‌ is 13.0 percent lower than the July 2022 rate

of 1,658,000.

Privately owned housing starts in July were at a ‌seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,452,000. This is 3.9 percent

(±16.0 percent) higher than the revised June estimate ⁢of​ 1,398,000 and 5.9 percent (±16.1 percent) higher than the July

2022 rate of 1,371,000.

For​ July, personal income and⁤ outlays, released on Aug. 31, showed that disposable personal income remained unchanged⁤ in current dollars and decreased by -0.2‍ percent ⁤in chained 2012 dollars. (“Chained dollars” is a⁢ measure of inflation that considers changes in consumer behavior‌ in response to price changes.) Personal income in current dollars increased by 0.2 percent. Since January 2021, real ⁢disposable personal income per capita has declined by‍ over $3,000 due to inflation and economic factors.

The July Personal ‌Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index (excluding food and energy), released ‌on Aug. 31, is reported to be ⁣the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation. It showed a slight⁣ increase to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. The PCE inflation,⁤ also known as “headline inflation,” stood at ‌3.3 percent, up from June’s 3.0 percent. This spike could indicate ​the possibility of further ‌rate‍ increases by⁢ the Fed.

The IBD/TIPP Economic ‌Optimism ‌Index for⁢ August, released⁣ on Aug. 8,‍ fell by 2.4 ‍percent to 40.3. A reading‌ below 50 indicates pessimism.

Opinion and Outlook

Trustworthy Numbers?

I’m deeply concerned ‍about the significant downward‌ revisions in⁣ jobs data, with two consecutive months‍ seeing revisions in the ‌six-figure range. This⁣ should be a matter of concern for Congress as well. It raises questions about the ⁣accuracy and reliability of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. In our ⁤view,​ these substantial ‍overstatements of jobs creation may be part of President Joe‍ Biden’s reelection campaign’s efforts to portray “Bidenomics” in a​ positive light. While​ Friday jobs reports often make headlines and impact markets, the ‌revisions, which are typically much smaller, tend to receive ‌less attention.

It’s worth recalling that in October ⁢2012, General Electric CEO​ Jack ⁢Welch raised allegations of manipulation in BLS jobs data, claiming ‍they were‌ made to appear better than they⁣ actually were. The September 2012 Jobs Report, released just before the November elections when Barack Obama faced Mitt Romney, held significant‍ influence. Welch ⁢faced criticism from the media ‍for his claims, with reminders that BLS statisticians ⁤are career‌ public⁢ employees who ⁢are supposed ‌to be above political influence.

However, it later emerged that Welch’s suspicions were not unfounded.​ A U.S. Census employee ⁤had indeed falsified data ⁤for the Household survey, which was used to calculate the unemployment rate. Furthermore,⁣ New‍ York Post business columnist John Crudele reported⁢ that “a knowledgeable source says the deception ⁤went beyond ‌that ⁢one employee—that it escalated ⁢at the time President ‌Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues ⁢today.” Crudele provided his ‍source and supporting evidence to the Labor​ Department’s inspector general, but ‍reported ​that⁤ his calls went unanswered. The establishment media then criticized Crudele ‌for what they deemed a⁤ “reckless”⁤ story.

Given these prior claims from the current administration, it is reasonable to approach‌ the jobs data with caution.

That being ​said, ⁢with the latest⁢ revisions, the average⁢ three-month ⁢jobs creation stands at 150,000 new jobs. While not bad, it falls within ⁤the range typically considered necessary ​to accommodate population growth.

More concerning is the slowdown in jobs creation indicated by the JOLTS⁢ report and the overall economic slowdown reflected in‌ the ISM Manufacturing Index. The pace of growth is certainly decelerating, but at a moderate rate. As shown in the JOLTS chart above, we‍ may⁤ be heading ⁤towards



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker