Bernie Sanders to push vote jeopardizing military aid to Israel
Getty Images
Bernie Sanders Takes Stand Against Military Aid to Israel
Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont is set to make a bold move by forcing a vote on a measure that could potentially freeze military aid to Israel.
The Senate is scheduled to vote on Tuesday regarding a resolution that demands the State Department to conduct a review within 30 days, assessing whether Israel violated human rights during its conflict with Hamas in Gaza. If the report is not produced, aid to Israel would be halted until the report is provided or until separate approval is granted by the relevant authorities, as reported by the New York Times.
“There is a growing concern among the American people and in Congress that Israel’s actions are not just against Hamas, but also against the Palestinian people,” Sanders expressed to the Times. “It is disgraceful that children are starving to death with the help of American military aid. I believe many others share this sentiment.”
However, the chances of the measure passing in the Senate are slim, according to the Times.
Divided Opinions on the Resolution
Some Democrats, including Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, have objected to the timing of the resolution. They argue that invoking human rights authority, which has not been utilized since 1976, is not appropriate at this moment.
“While it is crucial to push for reduced civilian casualties and provide humanitarian assistance, we must acknowledge that Israel is currently engaged in a life-or-death struggle against a terrorist organization committed to its destruction,” stated Blumenthal to the Times. “Therefore, we should continue to provide both military and humanitarian aid.”
Last week, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby expressed that the proposed measure is not the right approach to address humanitarian concerns during the ongoing conflict. He emphasized that Israel is transitioning to a lower intensity operation, which is expected to reduce civilian casualties and increase humanitarian assistance.
Sanders’ Ongoing Criticism of Military Aid to Israel
This is not the first time Bernie Sanders has voiced his opposition to military aid for Israel during the Gaza conflict. In a letter last month, he urged President Joe Biden’s administration to maintain support for Israel’s defensive systems, such as the Iron Dome, but to cut over $10 billion that he claimed would be used for the Israeli bombardment of the Palestinian enclave.
What are the potential human rights violations that critics fear may be happening in Israel, and how should the United States address these concerns?
G progressive politicians and activists about the United States’ unconditional support for Israel, especially in light of the recent conflict in Gaza,” said Sanders in a statement. “It is important for us to ensure that our military aid to Israel is not being used to violate human rights or to perpetuate violence against innocent civilians.”
The senator’s move has drawn both support and backlash from different quarters. Proponents argue that it is essential for the United States to hold its allies accountable and to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not being misused. They argue that a comprehensive review of Israel’s actions is necessary to determine whether any human rights violations have taken place and if military aid should be continued.
However, critics argue that this resolution is a dangerous precedent that undermines the long-standing alliance between the United States and Israel. They argue that treating Israel as any other country and subjecting it to the same scrutiny as other nations is unfair and ignores the unique security challenges faced by Israel, particularly amidst the ongoing conflicts in the region.
The United States has been a long-time ally of Israel and has provided military aid and support for decades. This aid has been viewed as essential for Israel’s security and defense against its regional adversaries. However, concerns have been raised about the use of this aid and whether it has been misused in any way.
Supporters of Sanders’ resolution believe that it is critical for the United States to re-evaluate its relationship with Israel and ensure that its aid is not being used to perpetuate violence or human rights abuses. They argue that as a democracy and a nation with shared values, the United States should hold Israel accountable for its actions and not turn a blind eye to any potential violations.
Critics, on the other hand, argue that this resolution undermines the longstanding alliance and strategic partnership between the two countries. They argue that singling out Israel for scrutiny while ignoring the actions of other nations involved in conflicts is unfair and undermines the stability and security of the region.
The vote on this resolution comes at a crucial time, as tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate. The recent conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives and has further strained the relationship between the two sides. The United States, under the Biden administration, has expressed its commitment to a two-state solution and to fostering peace and stability in the region.
Regardless of the outcome of the vote, Sanders’ move has sparked an important debate about the United States’ relationship with Israel and the need for accountability when it comes to military aid. It raises questions about the balance between supporting an ally and ensuring that aid is being used responsibly. Whatever the decision, it is clear that the issue of military aid to Israel will continue to be a contentious and significant issue in US foreign policy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...