Biden Admin funded Hamas-linked mosque with $340K for COVID vaccine promotion.
Controversial Mosque Receives Taxpayer Funds for COVID Vaccination Efforts
Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center board member Dr. Essam Tellawi encourages members to get the COVID vaccination (Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center / YouTube).
The Biden administration, in its efforts to promote the coronavirus vaccine among minority communities, has allocated hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds to a mosque with controversial ties to terrorist groups and a history of promoting harmful practices.
Since 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services has awarded $340,000 in grants to the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque as part of a federal initiative to address vaccine hesitancy and health disparities in minority groups. Located in Falls Church, Va., the mosque has utilized the funds to organize vaccine clinics and display signs and banners advocating for vaccination.
Dar al-Hijrah has been linked to the funding of Hamas, the terrorist organization responsible for recent attacks on Israel. It also maintains close ties with Islamic Relief USA, whose parent organization in the U.K. has faced accusations of funding Hamas and supporting other terrorist groups. Notably, some mosque leaders and members have been associated with terrorist organizations, including an imam who publicly endorsed female genital mutilation, a practice condemned by federal health agencies.
These grants are just one example of the Biden administration providing taxpayer money to organizations with connections to Islamic terrorists. The State Department, for instance, granted funds to Palestinian universities that praised Hamas as “righteous martyrs.”
Dar al-Hijrah’s association with terrorists is well-documented. During the 9/11 attacks, Anwar Al-Awlaki, an al-Qaeda organizer, served as the lead imam at the mosque, and at least three of the hijackers attended his sermons. Additionally, Army Major Nidal Hasan, responsible for the Fort Hood massacre, attended services at Dar al-Hijrah and communicated with Al-Awlaki. Other individuals connected to the mosque have been convicted or indicted for supporting terrorist activities.
The mosque’s current imams have also expressed anti-Israel sentiments following the Hamas attack. One imam even appeared to condone Hamas violence and spread conspiracy theories about the Israel-Hamas conflict.
While it remains unclear how the grants were specifically used to promote vaccines, the mosque’s annual report indicates that a portion of the funds was allocated for various awareness-raising efforts, including street banners, yard signs, videos, and vaccine clinics.
A spokesperson for Dar al-Hijrah expressed pride in the grants received for their social services department but also called on the White House and Congress to address what they perceive as Israel’s illegal occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians.
The Department of Health and Human Services has not responded to inquiries regarding these grants.
How does the allocation of taxpayer funds to the controversial mosque impact the effectiveness and appropriateness of the Biden administration’s vaccine distribution efforts?
Has been banned in several countries due to its alleged support for terrorism. Additionally, the mosque has a history of controversial statements and actions, including hosting radical speakers and promoting discriminatory practices such as gender segregation and the subjugation of women.
By allocating taxpayer funds to a mosque with such questionable ties and practices, the Biden administration raises serious concerns about the appropriateness and effectiveness of its vaccine distribution efforts. While it is important to ensure that minority communities have access to the vaccine and receive accurate information about its benefits, providing financial support to an institution with extremist associations undermines these goals.
Furthermore, the allocation of taxpayer funds to the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque raises questions about the vetting process for recipients of federal grants. The mosque’s controversial history and links to terrorist organizations should have been thoroughly researched and evaluated before awarding them taxpayer funds. This points to a lack of due diligence and scrutiny in the decision-making process, which is deeply troubling.
There is a legitimate concern that taxpayer funds intended for public health initiatives are being misused to support organizations with questionable motives and practices. The money allocated to Dar Al-Hijrah could have been better utilized by directing it to reputable healthcare providers or community organizations that have a proven track record of promoting public health and are free from extremist associations.
It is crucial for the Biden administration to address these concerns and provide transparency regarding the decision to allocate taxpayer funds to the controversial mosque. The public deserves to know how and why these funds were awarded, and what measures are in place to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not inadvertently supporting extremist organizations.
Moreover, this case highlights the need for a more robust vetting process when awarding federal grants, especially in sensitive areas such as public health and community outreach. The government must prioritize the safety and well-being of its citizens and ensure that taxpayer funds are utilized effectively and ethically.
In conclusion, the allocation of taxpayer funds to the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque for COVID vaccination efforts raises serious concerns about the appropriateness and effectiveness of the Biden administration’s vaccine distribution strategy. The mosque’s controversial ties to terrorist groups and its promotion of harmful practices cast doubts on the legitimacy of its role in public health initiatives. The administration must address these concerns, provide transparency, and strengthen the vetting process for federal grants to prevent taxpayer dollars from supporting extremist organizations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...