oann

Biden Administration Working With CAIR; Previously Investigated By The FBI

OAN’s Stella Escobedo

1:10 PM – Wednesday, November 15, 2023

The Biden Administration is heavily relying on CAIR to shape its policies. However, CAIR has a controversial past, ‍with its founder having ties to Hamas ⁣and being investigated by the FBI. In an exclusive interview, National Security analyst Brigitte Gabriel reveals ⁤the extent of CAIR’s influence in American politics.


Share this post!

The Biden Administration is heavily relying on CAIR to shape its policies.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee‍ convenes to discuss the future ⁣plans for​ aid to the region and the U.S. Afghanistan policy since the 2021 pullout.

As tensions rise after Hamas’ deadly attack on Israel, Chief White House Correspondent Monica Paige interviews a Holocaust survivor about the alarming rise of anti-Semitism, both globally and within our own country.

New intelligence reveals that Hamas terrorists⁣ are using hospitals as command‍ centers.

Starlink has secured a contract to​ provide free⁢ internet in Mexico⁤ until the end of ​2026.

U.S. lawmakers are demanding‍ an explanation from Apple‍ Inc regarding the sudden ⁤cancellation of political ‍comedian Jon Stewart’s television show on its streaming service.

Elon Musk⁣ dismisses reports​ of SpaceX considering an IPO for its satellite internet⁢ business, Starlink.

Despite new export curbs aimed at advancing‌ China’s semiconductor industry, Chinese companies continue to‌ purchase U.S. chipmaking​ equipment.

How does CAIR’s promotion of radical ideologies, as evidenced by controversial statements made ⁣by its co-founders, raise questions about the organization’s true nature and motives?

Rmer executives tied to ​terrorist‍ organizations and its promotion of radical ideologies. This raises concerns about the influence that CAIR has on the‍ decision-making process of the current‌ administration.

CAIR, short for​ the Council on American-Islamic Relations, presents ‌itself⁣ as a civil rights organization advocating for the rights of Muslims in America. While this may ⁢sound noble, a closer examination of its ​history reveals a different story. Several former executives ⁢of CAIR have been linked to or convicted ‌for their involvement ‍in ⁤terrorist organizations.

One prominent example is‌ Ghassan Elashi, a founder of CAIR’s Texas chapter. Elashi was convicted ⁤in 2004 for financial support of Hamas, a designated terrorist group responsible for numerous⁢ attacks against Israel. Similarly, another former executive, ⁤Nabil Sadoun, pled guilty in⁣ 2009 to​ conspiracy to ‍support Hamas and was‍ sentenced to four years ⁢in prison.

These examples illustrate a disturbing pattern within ‍CAIR’s leadership. Rather than promoting peaceful coexistence and tolerance, some of its key figures have⁢ been associated with organizations directly involved in acts⁢ of violence and terrorism. This raises questions about the true nature⁣ and motives of the organization.

Furthermore, CAIR has been known for its ‌promotion of⁤ radical ideologies and controversial statements.‌ In 1998, CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad⁣ stated, “Islam isn’t in ‍America to be equal to any other faith, but to‍ become dominant.” Such rhetoric not⁢ only goes against the principles​ of equality⁤ and tolerance but also ⁣raises‍ concerns about the organization’s‍ ultimate goals.

Given these troubling associations and statements, it is disconcerting that the Biden ⁢Administration is ⁤heavily relying on CAIR to shape its‌ policies. This ‌raises questions about the decision-making process and the extent to⁢ which CAIR’s ideology and agenda are influencing the administration’s⁣ actions.

While⁤ it is important to engage with various community organizations, the ⁤government must‌ exercise caution and due diligence when partnering with groups that⁤ have controversial backgrounds.‌ The association of the ‌Biden ‌Administration with CAIR creates a perception ⁢of legitimizing an⁣ organization with troubling ties, ​potentially undermining the credibility of ⁣the administration’s policies.

Moreover, there are concerns about the impact of CAIR’s⁤ influence on national ‍security issues. Given the history of some of its former⁤ executives, it‍ is reasonable to question whether the organization’s input⁢ on​ counterterrorism strategies aligns with​ the ⁤best interests of the United States. National security ⁣should always be ‌the top priority, and any partnerships that⁤ may compromise this should be critically evaluated.

The Biden Administration should⁢ reassess its reliance on CAIR and consider ‌more balanced and objective perspectives when shaping its policies. While​ it is⁢ essential to​ engage with diverse communities and address their concerns, it should not come at the expense ‍of ⁢national security or ​aligning with organizations associated with controversial pasts.

In‌ conclusion, the Biden ⁣Administration’s‌ heavy reliance on CAIR to shape its ⁢policies raises concerns due to the organization’s controversial past. With ‍former executives linked to terrorist‌ organizations⁢ and its promotion of radical ‌ideologies, ⁤CAIR’s influence on decision-making processes is ​alarming. The government must exercise caution and critically evaluate any ​partnerships that may compromise⁢ national security or ⁢credibility. It is crucial to‌ engage with diverse communities but‌ not at the expense of aligning with organizations with troubling ties. A​ more ⁢balanced and objective⁣ approach is necessary to ensure the ​best interests of the United States ‍are upheld.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker