Biden campaign boasts massive funds while Republicans squabble and spend
President Biden Gears Up for 2024 Election with Massive Fundraising Efforts
With less than a year until the highly anticipated presidential election in November 2024, President Joe Biden is leaving no stone unturned in his quest for victory. In a display of his formidable donor power, Biden is expanding his already substantial war chest, preparing for what is likely to be a rematch with former President Donald Trump.
“It’s gigantic,” exclaimed Jeffrey Katzenberg, national co-chairman of the Biden campaign. “Every dollar he is raising is being allocated towards November 5, 2024. On the other side, everybody else today is trying to figure out how to survive the primary gauntlet.”
Biden’s Record-Breaking Fundraising Efforts
Katzenberg, a prominent Democratic fundraiser and former chairman of Walt Disney Studios and founder of DreamWorks Pictures, revealed the staggering success of Biden’s recent trip to California to meet with donors. The visit to Los Angeles alone brought in over $15 million for the campaign, surpassing the amount raised by former President Barack Obama during a similar trip in 2012.
Katzenberg emphasized, “The trip to L.A., on every measure and metric, could not have been more successful.”
Biden’s Fundraising Advantage
Not only is Biden excelling in fundraising, but he also holds a significant advantage over his Republican competitors. Katzenberg pointed out, “They’re all spending their money fighting one another while Donald Trump seems to be spending most of his money trying to stay out of jail.”
As the 2024 election draws nearer, President Biden’s relentless fundraising efforts demonstrate his determination to secure another term in office.
What is one argument against mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods related to cost?
There are several arguments against mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods. Some of them include:
1. Cost: Implementing mandatory labeling for genetically modified foods would increase the cost of food production and processing. This additional cost is likely to be passed on to consumers, resulting in higher food prices.
2. Scientific consensus: Many scientific bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), have concluded that genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Requiring labeling for these foods may suggest that they are somehow different or harmful, which contradicts scientific consensus.
3. Consumer confusion: Mandatory labeling could confuse consumers and lead to misinterpretation of the information provided. Without proper knowledge, consumers may mistakenly believe that genetically modified foods are inherently dangerous, despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting this view.
4. Inefficiency: Labeling genetically modified foods would require a separate supply chain and infrastructure, which can be inefficient and costly to implement. It may also lead to a fragmentation of the food market, making it more challenging for producers and distributors to comply with varying labeling requirements across different jurisdictions.
5. Discrimination against farmers: Many genetically modified crops are engineered to be more resistant to pests or diseases, reducing the need for pesticide use and benefiting farmers. Labeling these crops may stigmatize the farmers who grow them and discourage their use, potentially limiting the availability of these benefits.
6. Fear-based marketing: Mandatory labeling can open the door to fear-based marketing, where companies can exploit consumer concerns without providing any additional useful information. This could lead to unnecessary fear and anxiety among consumers over genetically modified foods.
It’s important to note that proponents of mandatory labeling argue that it provides transparency and allows consumers to make informed choices about the food they purchase. They believe that consumers have a right to know whether their food contains genetically modified ingredients, regardless of the scientific consensus on their safety.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...