Biden sidesteps Constitution by allowing failed nominees as agency heads.
Biden’s Disregard for the Constitution
As Biden continues to shift further left, he shows a blatant disregard for the Constitution and the country that elected him. Two failed nominations highlight his disregard for the institution he served for almost half a century. These nominations also provide a glimpse into what a second Biden term would look like.
The ‘Acting Secretary’ Loophole
Biden’s first failed nominee, Julie Su, was nominated for Secretary of Labor. Despite Senate rejection, Su remains in place as acting labor secretary. The administration refuses to nominate anyone else, ignoring the Senate’s decision. Similarly, Jeff Marootian, Biden’s second failed nominee, was kept in a deputy role despite his nomination being withdrawn. This pattern of bypassing the Senate is concerning.
Skirting the Senate, Skirting the Constitution
Both nominations demonstrate a disregard for the Senate, which is particularly surprising considering Biden’s extensive experience in the institution. This is not just a matter of decorum; it is a constitutional issue. The Senate’s role in approving executive branch officers is clearly outlined in Article II of the Constitution. By ignoring Senate rejection, Biden undermines the constitutional process.
A Preview of a Second Biden Term
These nomination rejections provide insight into how Biden would govern in a second term. As his popularity declines, Biden becomes more reliant on the left and their extreme policies. This means nominating more extreme individuals who are likely to face Senate rejection. In a second term, Biden would have even less incentive to listen to the Senate, the Constitution, or the American people.
Standing Up for the Constitution
It is crucial for the Senate to assert its constitutional authority and protect its prerogatives. Regardless of party, all senators should unite in defending the Senate’s role in the nomination process. Republicans should join forces with Democrats and independents who oppose these nominations and demand their removal from positions of power.
How do President Biden’s executive orders and policy proposals, such as his immigration policies and support for expanding the Supreme Court, contribute to the growing concerns over his commitment to the Constitution and its fundamental principles
Highlight the growing concerns over his commitment to upholding the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution.
The first failed nomination that raises eyebrows is that of Neera Tanden for the position of Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Tanden’s nomination was met with strong opposition from both Republicans and Democrats alike due to her controversial and partisan remarks on social media. These remarks not only showed a lack of respect for the political process but also revealed an alarming disregard for the principle of impartiality and fairness that the Constitution demands from public officials.
Rather than choosing a qualified candidate who could bridge the ideological divide and foster bipartisanship, Biden chose to nominate someone with a track record of divisive rhetoric and inflammatory statements. This decision not only shows a disregard for the need to heal a deeply divided nation but also undermines the credibility and integrity of the OMB as an institution responsible for managing the federal budget.
The second failed nomination that underscores Biden’s disregard for the Constitution is that of Xavier Becerra for the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Becerra, a staunch advocate for expanding government control over healthcare, has a history of attacking religious liberties, most notably in his legal battles against the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of Catholic nuns who objected to providing contraceptive coverage based on their religious beliefs.
By nominating Becerra, Biden signals a disdain for the Constitution’s protection of religious freedom and raises concerns about the potential infringement on the rights of individuals and organizations with deeply held religious beliefs. Rather than selecting a candidate who will uphold and protect the constitutional rights of all Americans, Biden chose someone who has actively worked against those rights.
These failed nominations are not isolated incidents but reflective of a larger pattern of Biden’s disregard for the Constitution. His executive orders and policy proposals, such as his immigration policies that disregard the rule of law and his support for expanding the Supreme Court, further erode the fundamental principles and checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution.
As the leader of the United States, Biden has a responsibility to uphold and defend the Constitution, which is the cornerstone of American democracy. Yet, his actions and choices demonstrate a lack of respect for the Constitution and the principles it embodies. This disregard not only undermines the trust of the American people but also sets a dangerous precedent for future leaders who may use their positions of power to advance their own agendas without regard for the Constitution and the rights of the people.
It is imperative that Americans remain vigilant and hold their elected officials accountable for their actions. The Constitution is not a mere document, but a living embodiment of the values and principles that define our nation. It is the duty of every citizen to defend and protect the Constitution to ensure the preservation of our democracy and the rights and liberties it guarantees.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
