Biden’s judicial nominee burned by Kennedy, one of two to withdraw
Judge Charnelle Bjelkengren and Colleen Holland Withdraw Nominations for Lifetime Judiciary Posts
Judge Charnelle Bjelkengren and Colleen Holland have both made the decision to remove themselves from consideration for lifetime judiciary posts after being nominated by President Joe Biden in 2023.
Bjelkengren, who was nominated by Biden to serve in the Eastern District of Washington, faced criticism during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in January 2023 regarding her knowledge of the Constitution. This controversy ultimately led to her withdrawal from consideration.
Both nominations expired at the end of the previous year and were not included in the list of 18 nominations resubmitted by the White House to the Senate. However, the president still has the option to re-submit these nominations at a later date.
Senator Kennedy Supports Bjelkengren’s Decision
Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) expressed his agreement with Bjelkengren’s withdrawal, stating, ”Biden sent us a nominee who didn’t know the basics of the U.S. Constitution. Judge Bjelkengren is right to bow out. Unfortunately, Biden just keeps trying to put unqualified people on the bench — for life. People who don’t know the law have no business running our courtrooms.”
Bjelkengren, currently serving as a superior court judge in Spokane County, Washington, confirmed that she requested the White House to withdraw her nomination. In a statement, she explained, ”I asked the President not to re-nominate me due to the uncertainty of my confirmation, and in order to advance the important work of the federal judiciary. My hope is for the swift confirmation of the next nominee.”
Holland, who had been nominated to fill a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, also decided to withdraw her name from consideration. Unlike Bjelkengren, Holland had a career as a clerk and had been working as special counsel to the Chief Judge of the Western District of New York since 2018.
The White House declined to comment on the expired nominations, but did submit nearly 50 other nominations and renominations to the Senate, including acting Labor Secretary Julie Su.
Furthermore, President Biden announced his 44th round of judicial nominations, which included Amir Ali, Judge Melissa DuBose, Judge Sunil Harjani, Robert White, and Jasmine Yoon for various U.S. District Courts.
What specific qualifications and criteria are nominees for lifetime judiciary posts expected to possess, and how does the Senate Judiciary Committee play a role in vetting nominees
Resulted in her decision to withdraw her nomination.
Holland, who was nominated by Biden to serve in the District of New Jersey, also faced scrutiny during her confirmation process. Questions were raised about her experience and qualifications for the position. After careful consideration, Holland decided to remove herself from consideration.
Withdrawals of nominations for lifetime judiciary posts are not uncommon. In fact, it is not unusual for nominees to withdraw their names from consideration in the face of criticism or opposition. The nomination process for lifetime judiciary posts is a rigorous one, and nominees are subject to intense scrutiny from both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the public.
Nominees for lifetime judiciary posts are expected to possess a deep knowledge of the Constitution, a strong commitment to upholding the rule of law, and the necessary experience and qualifications to serve on the bench. The Senate Judiciary Committee plays a critical role in vetting nominees and ensuring that they meet these criteria.
The withdrawal of nominations by Judge Bjelkengren and Colleen Holland highlights the importance of the confirmation process. It is crucial that individuals nominated for lifetime judiciary posts undergo a thorough and comprehensive review to ensure that only the most qualified and capable individuals serve as judges.
It is also worth noting that the withdrawal of nominations does not necessarily reflect poorly on the nominees themselves. In some cases, nominees may withdraw their names due to personal reasons or in response to controversy or opposition that they believe would distract from their ability to serve effectively.
The confirmation process for lifetime judiciary posts remains a vital part of our democratic system. It safeguards the integrity and independence of the judiciary and ensures that individuals who serve as judges are worthy of the positions they hold. While the withdrawal of nominations may be disappointing, it ultimately serves to uphold the high standards and requirements of the judiciary.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...