Biden Laptop Repairman Blasts Hunter’s Attempt to Punish Critics

Hunter Biden’s high-priced lawyers sent letters to the following Wednesday Delaware attorney general And the Department of Justice They were pushed to open investigations into a number of people who shared information that was allegedly taken from the laptop left at a Delaware computer repair shop. But yesterday’s transparent attempt to sic top state and federal law enforcement officials on those exposing the Biden family pay-to-play scandal is already backfiring, with Biden’s attorney clarifying the letters are not an admission that the laptop was Hunter’s.

Two detailed 14-page letters were written by Winston & Strawn attorney Abbe Daniel Lowell by Hunter Biden’s attorney. They requested that the Attorney General of Delaware and the Department of Justice investigate whether John Paul Mac Isaac or Robert Costello, Rudy Giuliani. Stephen Bannon and Jack Maxey committed state and federal crimes. “There is considerable reason to believe” These people violated different laws “in accessing, copying, manipulating, and/or disseminating Mr. Biden’s personal computer data,” Hunter’s attorney opened his Wednesday missive.

The lengthy letters then detail each of the individuals’ purported actions that Lowell claims provide “considerable reason to believe” They committed various crimes of state and federal nature, which Winston & Strawn attorneys then identify and analyze.  

Lowell starts with John Paul Mac Isaac, who owns the Delaware repair shop where laptop was left for repairs. “Mr. Mac Isaac has admitted to gaining access to our client’s personal computer data in Delaware without Mr. Biden’s consent.” 

“Mr. Mac Isaac has admitted to copying that data without Mr. Biden’s consent, and Mr. Mac Isaac has admitted to distributing copies of that data from his place in Delaware,” Continue the letter to Delaware AG

Mac Isaac has been a consistent believer in the importance of this since day one. “computer data” he copied was contained on a laptop abandoned at his repair shop by an individual he believed was Hunter Biden, yesterday’s letters to the Delaware attorney general and the DOJ appeared as an apparent admission by Hunter that yes, the laptop was his.  

Hunter was asked if he would like to be a part of the Hunter family. “now acknowledge[s] he or someone on his behalf dropped off his laptop for repairs at Mac Isaac’s store,” Lowell spoke to The Federalist “These letters do not confirm Mac Isaac’s or others’ versions of a so-called laptop. They address their conduct of seeking, manipulating and disseminating what they allege to be Mr. Biden’s personal data, wherever they claim to have gotten it.”

In an exclusive interview with The Federalist, Mac Isaac’s attorney Brian Della Rocca seemed flabbergasted by the continued obfuscating by Hunter Biden’s legal team. “Is Hunter denying that he was in Delaware in April of 2019 then? To this day, he has not denied being in Wilmington at that time,” He said. “Nor has he ever denied dropping off the laptop with John Paul. Is he denying doing so now?”

“John Paul has not, nor will he ever manipulate the data on Hunter’s hard drive. That is just not who he is,” The Federalist was told by Della Rocca. Della Rocca said that it would be easy for the data to be authenticated. She also stressed that “the data on the drive he has can be compared to the laptop, which is in the possession of the FBI, to show he has not made any changes to the information.”  

Della Rocca also condemned the letters’ attempt to suggest Mac Isaac lied to law enforcement officials.  

“Mr. Mac Isaac has insisted that he did not make a bit-by-bit copy or clone of the hard drive,” page eight of the Biden attorney’s letter maintained, continuing:

Nor could he make such a copy because the hard drive was soldered to the laptop’s mother board, and he could not stay logged into the waterlogged laptop long enough to copy the entirety of the hard drive because the waterlogged laptop would periodically turn off. Instead, Mr. Mac Isaac chose what he wanted to access and copy from Mr. Biden’s personal data that Mr. Mac Isaac unlawfully obtained. Therefore, Mr. Mac Isaac’s representation to law enforcement that the hard drive was his entire possession would have been a blatant lie. Moreover, the absence of a true clone of the hard drive created the opportunity for mischief—namely, the addition of files to this “hard drive,” This allows you to manipulate files. “hard drive,” This includes the destruction of files “hard drive.”

Mac Isaac’s attorney told The Federalist this passage represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the process for retrieving data from a damaged MacBook Pro 13. “Due to the damaged condition and poor stability of the MacBook, John Paul had to manually recover the user data,” Mac Isaac’s attorney explained. “John Paul was able to recover the entire contents (220GB) [of] the folder named, RobertHunter.”

“Per Hunter’s request, no attempt to recover the remaining system files or applications was made because they did not include personal data,” Mac Isaac’s lawyer stressed. Della Rocca emphasized that “the only law enforcement agency to which John Paul has provided a copy of Hunter Biden’s laptop was the FBI,” The FBI also had custody of the laptop at that time. This allowed the FBI to see what Mac Isaac had found. “RobertHunter” Folder on the original laptop “There would be no difference,” Mac Isaac’s attorney emphasized.  

The accusation that Mac Isaac accessed Hunter Biden’s personal data without his consent is also “absolutely false,” The Federalist was informed by Della Rocca.  

The signed repair, which Della Rocca failed to elaborate on, was nevertheless completed. Contract If the laptop is not returned within 90 days, “notification of completed service,” It would be considered as “abandoned.” Hunter Biden’s attorney did not respond to The Federalist’s inquiry on whether it was his position that Hunter Biden had “not abandoned the property under the repair contract,” with the Winston & Strawn attorney instead stressing the letters do not confirm Mac Isaac’s “versions of a so-called laptop.”  

Further, the repair agreement stipulated that Mac Isaac would be held by the owner of the equipment. “harmless for any damage or loss of property.”  

We are still here, however, “another privileged person hiring yet another high-priced attorney to redirect attention away from his own unlawful actions,” Della Rocca scoffed. “This is entirely a P.R. move,” he added, telling The Federalist he first saw the lengthy letters from Hunter’s attorney when CBS contacted him for comment.

The public relations move, however, is already backfiring, with the general public interpreting the letter as an implicit acknowledgment that the laptop from hell was Hunter Biden’s. And things may only get worse, if the FBI is forced to confirm that, yes, the damning documents publicly circulating are authentic copies of the material contained in the MacBook’s “RobertHunter” folder.

Margot Cleveland, The Federalist’s senior law correspondent, is Margot. She has also contributed to National Review Online and Washington Examiner. Aleteia and Townhall.com. Her work has also been published in USA Today and Wall Street Journal.

Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. Later, she served as a permanent law clerk on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for almost 25 years. Cleveland, a former faculty member at a university full-time, now teaches adjunct.

Cleveland is a stay at home mom to a son with cystic Fibrosis. She writes frequently about cultural issues related parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland can be found on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland These views are hers in private.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases