Biden Uses Final Address to Call for an Amended Constitution in Apparent Move Against Trump

In a recent farewell address, President Joe Biden proposed⁢ an amendment to​ the U.S.Constitution aimed at removing presidential immunity for actions taken while in office. This call follows a series of lawsuits against former President Donald Trump and accusations of wrongdoing during his first term. Biden emphasized ⁣that “no president is immune from crimes” and argued against the notion‌ of unlimited presidential power.

Additionally, Biden’s address highlighted other ‌proposed reforms, including an end to dark money in politics, a term limit for Supreme‍ Court Justices, ethics reforms, and a ban on stock trading by Congress members. The context of his proposal is shaped by a Supreme Court‌ ruling that affirmed presidential immunity for acts related to official duties but not for unofficial actions. biden criticized this ruling,arguing that it undermines the accountability of the presidency.

While the suggestion of ‍amending the Constitution is bold, Biden acknowledged the challenges involved in passing such amendments, which require significant support​ from⁣ Congress or state legislatures. Biden’s remarks reflect his intent to address ⁤perceived abuses of presidential power and reinforce the⁢ accountability of the office.


President Joe Biden called on Wednesday evening for an amendment to the Constitution that would end presidential immunity for acts while in office.

The comments, which came during his farewell address, come after President-elect Donald Trump faced several lawsuits in recent years and accusations from Democrats of crimes committed during his first term, prompting speculation that the proposed amendment was targeted at him.

“We need to amend the Constitution to make clear that no president, no president, is immune from crimes that he or she commits while in office,” Biden said from the Oval Office.

“The president’s power is not unlimited. It’s not absolute. And it shouldn’t be,” he added.

The Supreme Court ruled last summer in Trump v. United States that presidents have absolute immunity for acts that fall within their core constitutional duties, as well as presumptive immunity for official acts in the broader span of their responsibilities, but no immunity for unofficial acts.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion that “like everyone else, the President is subject to prosecution in his unofficial capacity.”

“But unlike anyone else, the President is a branch of government, and the Constitution vests in him sweeping powers and duties,” he added.

“Accounting for that reality — and ensuring that the President may exercise those powers forcefully, as the Framers anticipated he would — does not place him above the law; it preserves the basic structure of the Constitution from which that law derives,” the opinion declared.

Justices declined to rule on whether or not presidential immunity applied to alleged actions committed by Trump, remanding that part of the case to a district court.

Biden was among the Democrats who were highly critical of that decision.

“The presidency is the most powerful office in the world,” he said on the day of the ruling, per a transcript from the White House.

“It’s an office that not only tests your judgment, perhaps even more importantly it’s an office that can test your character because you not only face moments where you need the courage to exercise the full power of the presidency, you also face moments where you need the wisdom to respect the limits of the power of the office of the presidency,” Biden added.

“With today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed,” he continued. “For all practical purposes, today’s decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.”

Biden also claimed that the decision would potentially enable Trump to enter office “more emboldened to do whatever he pleases whenever he wants to do it.”

Despite the suggestion of an amendment from Biden, the odds of altering the nation’s founding documents are typically slim.

An amendment to the Constitution can be proposed with the assent of a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate or by a two-thirds majority of state legislatures to call for a convention.

Then three-fourths of the state legislatures must ratify the amendment, or three-fourths of states must hold conventions to approve the amendment.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker