White House: Biden won’t pardon indicted Hunter, facing up to 17 years

President ⁤Biden⁢ Will Not Pardon Son Hunter, White House ‌Confirms

The ⁣White House reiterated on Friday that⁢ President Joe Biden will not grant a pardon to his son, Hunter Biden. This comes as Hunter faces the ​possibility of up to ⁤17 years in prison following his second indictment in‌ four months, with the latest charges ‌relating ⁤to unfiled and unpaid taxes. ‍President Biden has previously ‌stated his ‌stance on not ‌pardoning⁤ Hunter, and it appears that this position remains ​unchanged.

Hunter Biden​ Indicted on Criminal Tax Charges in California

“Nothing has ⁤changed,”⁢ White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters aboard Air Force ⁣One. “That‍ is⁣ still the ‌case.”

The nine-count ⁢indictment, handed down ‌by special counsel David Weiss on ‌Thursday ‍evening, has raised questions about‍ the extent of Joe ‌Biden’s involvement⁣ in his son’s actions. The⁤ White House has been ​tight-lipped since the⁣ indictment⁣ was⁤ announced, with President Biden ⁢declining to answer questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One. Inquiries regarding ‌the ⁤indictment have‍ been directed to the Department of ⁣Justice.

“The president has ‌said this ‌before,⁤ and he will‍ continue to say‍ that he loves his son and supports him as he continues to ‍rebuild⁤ his life,” Jean-Pierre stated when asked for a reaction to the ⁢news. “I am going ⁢to ⁣be ‍really careful and not comment on⁢ this and refer you to the ⁣Department of Justice or my colleagues at the White House ​counsel.”

Both the Justice Department and the White House counsel have refrained from commenting on​ the new indictment thus far. When asked about the emotional toll the indictment may be taking on Joe ⁤Biden, Jean-Pierre declined to provide ​further comment.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The charges ​against Hunter Biden​ consist ⁤of three felonies and six misdemeanors, including failure to pay‌ taxes, failure to file taxes, and filing false returns from 2016 to 2019. While the maximum penalty for these charges is up to 17 years in⁢ prison, ⁢it is ⁢likely that‌ any sentence Hunter Biden receives will be significantly lower based on typical sentencing practices.

Why‌ has President ⁣Biden chosen not to intervene in‍ his son’s legal affairs, ​and how does this decision‌ reflect his​ administration’s commitment to ⁤transparency and the rule of law?

Reported income. The White​ House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki,‌ made​ the announcement during a press briefing, clarifying the administration’s position on the matter.

Hunter Biden has been embroiled in multiple controversies throughout his father’s⁣ political career.‌ The latest indictment comes as no surprise‍ to many, considering the scrutiny and legal challenges he‌ has faced in recent years. ‌The charges, which include tax offenses, raise serious concerns about the legality of his ⁣financial activities.

Despite the ‍familial connection, President Biden has consistently maintained that ​he⁣ will not intervene in his son’s legal ‌affairs. This‌ stance aligns with his promises ⁢of upholding the principles of transparency and the ‍rule of law set forth by ⁢his administration.

The ‍decision not to pardon Hunter Biden demonstrates ​the‌ integrity of⁢ the President ​and his commitment ⁣to maintaining a fair judicial system. Granting a pardon‌ to his son would have undoubtedly raised questions of nepotism and ⁣preferential treatment.

President Biden’s decision ​also reflects the broader sentiment of the American ​people. While it ⁢is understandable‌ for ⁤a parent to feel a natural inclination to protect their child, ​it is crucial to uphold⁢ the principles of justice and⁣ equality. Pardoning Hunter⁢ Biden⁤ would have undermined the public’s trust in the justice system‍ and could have set‌ a dangerous precedent.

The charges against ⁣Hunter Biden are ‍serious and must be dealt‍ with in a thorough‌ and impartial manner. ⁤It would be inappropriate for⁢ the President to interfere with ongoing legal proceedings, especially⁤ when the charges involve potential financial crimes. All individuals, regardless of ​their familial relations, must be held accountable for their actions.

This case serves as a reminder that being​ connected to ⁣a prominent figure does not grant immunity from ⁢the‍ consequences of illegal activities.⁣ It is crucial‍ for society ⁤to believe in⁣ the fairness and impartiality ​of the justice system. Granting a pardon to Hunter Biden would have cast doubt on the credibility and legitimacy of the legal process.

President Biden’s decision not to pardon his son should be commended. It showcases his dedication to ‌upholding⁢ the ​principles of justice, accountability, and‌ the rule of law. The American people can now be assured that favoritism ​and preferential treatment will‌ not⁢ reign supreme within this ⁣administration.

As the ​legal proceedings‍ against Hunter Biden​ continue, it‌ will be essential to remain focused on⁢ the facts and allow the justice ⁤system to run its course.‍ The outcome⁣ of this​ case will⁤ have significant implications for ⁣the credibility of ⁤the Biden administration. It is crucial to allow the legal proceedings‍ to unfold without any​ outside interference or ⁤biases.

Moving forward, ⁣it is essential for the‌ Biden administration⁤ to prioritize transparency in dealing with potential conflicts of interest. The American people deserve to have confidence in their leaders and trust that their actions are⁤ guided by ethical considerations.

In ⁣conclusion, the White House’s confirmation that ​President Biden will not pardon his son, Hunter⁢ Biden, is a reaffirmation of the administration’s commitment to ⁢the principles of justice and equality. Granting ‌a pardon would have undermined the integrity of the justice system and ⁤raised⁣ questions about preferential treatment. As the legal‍ proceedings unfold, it is‌ crucial to remain ⁢focused on the facts ⁤and ‍allow the justice system to run its course. The Biden administration must continue⁢ to prioritize transparency and‌ ethical conduct to uphold the trust of‍ the American people.