Biden’s DHS mandates border agents to respect preferred pronouns of undocumented individuals

The Biden Administration’s DHS Instructs ⁢Border Patrol⁣ Agents ​to Use Gender-Neutral ‌Language

The Department⁣ of Homeland Security (DHS) under the Biden administration is implementing new guidelines for Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents. These guidelines‍ require agents to ask immigrants for their “preferred pronouns” and to use gender-neutral language while on duty.

The guidance, titled “Guide to Facilitating Effective Communication with Individuals who ⁢Identify as LGBTQI+,” emphasizes the importance of inclusive language and instructs CBP‌ agents to avoid certain terms. It‍ states that all CBP employees should use this guidance ‌when interacting with the public, including individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming.

The document specifically ⁤states that CBP agents should not use gender-specific pronouns or titles until they ‌have more information about​ the individual. Terms like “Mr,” “Mrs,” ⁤”sir,” or “ma’am” are also discouraged.

🚨Biden Directs⁤ Border Patrol to use Illegal Aliens’ Preferred Pronouns

We just obtained @CBP documents directing personnel to only use ⁣woke language when encountering individuals invading the United States pic.twitter.com/HwhiYJmqmm

— Oversight Project‍ (@OversightPR) November 17, 2023

The guidance also clarifies that gender identity and sexual orientation are separate and ‌distinct, and that terms‍ and definitions may vary among ⁣LGBTQI+ ⁣individuals. It encourages CBP agents to be mindful of these differences.

The Department of Homeland Security’s focus on adopting new language comes ⁤at a time of crisis on the‌ southern border. Since President Biden took office, an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrants have entered the United States. This has led to criticism from Rep. Mark Green,​ Chairman of the‍ House Committee on Homeland Security, who believes that agents need more resources to address the border crisis instead of being trained on pronouns.

Recently, The Daily Wire revealed that the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Civil Rights and ⁤Civil Liberties commissioned a report⁢ from the RAND Corporation, which recommended⁣ changes to offensive language. The ⁢report suggested replacing terms like “male” and “female” with “nonbinary,” “cisgender,” and “transgender,” and replacing terms like “illegal immigrant” with “undocumented⁤ noncitizen.”⁤ Rep. Green criticized this⁣ report as a deceptive strategy ‌to hide the failures of Secretary ⁤Alejandro Mayorkas’ leadership.

Despite the controversy surrounding these language changes, ‌the DHS has not responded to ‌requests for comment.

What are some arguments made by critics ‌against the implementation of gender-neutral language ⁢guidelines, and how do proponents respond‍ to these criticisms

“ma’am” should⁤ be avoided unless explicitly requested by ⁢the individual. Instead, agents are encouraged to use gender-neutral pronouns such as “they” or “them” until the person’s‍ pronouns‌ are known.

The ‍guidelines also provide ⁤recommendations for respectful and inclusive⁤ communication. Agents are ‍instructed to use gender-neutral terms when referring ⁤to⁤ relationships or family members, such as “partner” instead of “husband” or​ “wife.” They are also advised to use inclusive language when discussing​ personal identification documents, such as using the term ‌”parent” instead of “mother” or “father.”

The ‌implementation of these guidelines by the DHS is⁣ seen as a significant step ‌towards creating ​an inclusive⁣ and respectful environment⁣ for individuals who identify as LGBTQI+. It aims to ensure that interactions ⁢between CBP agents and immigrants are respectful, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.

By asking individuals for ‌their preferred pronouns,​ CBP agents ​are demonstrating their commitment to‍ embracing diversity and promoting inclusivity. This practice helps to avoid misgendering and shows respect towards individuals’ self-identified gender.

Critics ⁣argue that these guidelines may hinder effective communication and create confusion for CBP agents. They claim that implementing ⁢such gender-neutral language requirements is unnecessary and may distract agents from their primary duties of ⁣border security and immigration enforcement. Some argue that these guidelines are a result‌ of political correctness ​and an ‌overemphasis on identity politics.

However, proponents​ of these guidelines argue that using gender-neutral language is a small but significant way to create an ‍inclusive and respectful environment. They believe that acknowledging and respecting individuals’ identities can positively impact their overall experience with CBP agents.

Furthermore, research has shown that using proper pronouns and gender-neutral language can have a significant impact on the mental ⁤health and well-being of transgender and nonbinary individuals. These guidelines aim to create an environment that is sensitive to the needs of all individuals, ⁢regardless of their gender identity.

The implementation of ⁣gender-neutral language guidelines by the Biden administration’s DHS is an important step towards creating a more ‌inclusive society. By instructing CBP agents to​ use gender-neutral language and respect individuals’‍ preferred ⁣pronouns, the DHS​ is ⁤setting⁢ a standard for respectful and inclusive communication.

While critics⁤ may argue that these guidelines are unnecessary and⁢ may hinder effective communication, proponents believe that‌ they contribute to a more inclusive and respectful environment. By recognizing and respecting individuals’ identities, ​these guidelines promote dignity ‌and respect in interactions between CBP agents and ​immigrants.

In conclusion, the ⁤implementation of gender-neutral language guidelines by the DHS is a significant step towards creating an inclusive and respectful environment for individuals who identify as​ LGBTQI+. These guidelines emphasize the importance of using inclusive ⁤language and respecting individuals’ preferred pronouns. While there ⁢may be differing opinions about the ​necessity and effectiveness of these guidelines, ‌they ⁤demonstrate the administration’s commitment to ​promoting diversity and inclusivity within the CBP and the larger society.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases