Texas Judge Blocks Biden’s Title IX Transgender Guidelines for Public Schools
A federal judge in Texas, Reed O’Connor, ruled that Texas is not required to comply with the Biden administration’s guidelines that interpret Title IX’s prohibitions against sex discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation. The ruling came as a result of a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in June 2023, in response to a 2021 guidance from the Biden administration’s Education Department. This guidance aimed to enforce Title IX to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in schools that receive federal funding, potentially affecting policies on bathroom access and sports team participation based on gender identity.
Judge O’Connor stated in his 112-page ruling that Title IX does not explicitly prohibit discrimination on these grounds and allows for sex-based differentiation in certain cases, such as intimate facilities and athletic teams, based on biological sex. The judge argued that including gender identity under discrimination based on sex was not a logical interpretation of Title IX. This decision supports Texas’s position against the broader federal interpretation of sex discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that Texas did not have to follow guidance from the Biden administration which interpreted prohibitions against sex discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation.
The judge ruled that Biden’s Education Department had unlawfully exceeded its authority when it issued guidance in 2021 that opened up the door for schools to be liable for discrimination if they adopted policies like limiting bathroom access on the basis of sex. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration in June 2023 to shield Texas from enforcement of the policy.
“Nothing in the statute expressly prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or other unexpressed grounds,” U.S. District Judge for the North District of Texas Reed O’Connor wrote in a 112-page ruling. “And where Title IX allows for differentiation based on sex due to biological differences — such as intimate facilities and athletic teams — recipients may treat persons in accordance with their biological sex without regard to subjective gender identity.”
Paxton’s lawsuit came after the Education Department released a memo on June 22, 2021, saying that it “interprets Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination ‘on the basis of sex’ to encompass discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.”
The department also said that it would “fully enforce Title IX to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in education programs” for schools that receive federal funding. This means schools could face legal challenges if they had policies in place that said transgender-identifying students would have to use the bathroom facility or play on a sports team based on sex.
Judge O’Connor disagreed with the Education Department, saying that it was not logical to include gender identity under sex.
“Title IX explicitly appreciates the innate biological variation between men and women that occasionally warrants differentiation — and even separation — to preserve educational opportunities and to promote respect for both sexes,” the George W. Bush appointee wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
The guidance is different from the widely challenged Title IX rules unveiled in April that officially add gender identity and sexual orientation into federal education discrimination law.
Paxton celebrated the judge’s decision, saying Biden’s guidance was dangerous.
“Joe Biden’s unlawful effort to weaponize Title IX for his extremist agenda has been stopped in its tracks,” Paxton said in a statement on Tuesday night. “Threatening to withhold education funding by forcing states to accept ‘transgender’ policies that put women in danger was plainly illegal. Texas has prevailed on behalf of the entire Nation.”
The guidance had previously been blocked from being enforced in 20 other states where a coalition of Republican attorneys general had challenged the policy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...