oann

Dems score big: Wisconsin Supreme Court orders new maps


A⁣ gavel and hearing notes are seen during a debate in the Senate chamber at the Texas state Capitol on April 04, 2023 in Austin,‌ Texas. (Photo by ⁤Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

OAN’s Sophia Flores
2:57 PM – Friday, December 22, 2023

Christmas​ came early this year⁢ for ‍Wisconsin Democrats as the left-leaning Wisconsin ⁢Supreme Court has ‌voted to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps.

Advertisement

On Friday,‍ in ​a ​vote ⁣of 4-3, the court‌ approved the decision to create newly-drawn district boundary ⁣lines.​

Democrats argued that the legislative⁢ maps are ⁣not constitutional since the districts drawn are ​not contiguous. ⁣Additionally, they argued that the Supreme Court had violated the ⁤separation of powers ‍doctrine.

“Because⁣ the current state legislative districts contain separate, detached territory⁤ and therefore violate the‍ constitution’s contiguity requirements, we enjoin the⁤ Wisconsin Elections ‍Commission from‌ using the current legislative maps in future​ elections,” Justice‌ Jill Karofksy wrote‌ for the majority.

Previously, liberal Justice Janet ‌Janet Protasiewicz⁤ has ⁣gone as far as to call the GOP-drawn maps‍ “unfair” and even “rigged.”

The lawsuit to‍ redistrict the boundary⁢ lines was filed the day ‍after the court flipped​ to a‍ Democrat ⁤majority, back in August.

Republicans⁢ from the Badger State⁤ have power in passing maps ⁤that ⁤Governor Tony Evers (D-Wis.) will ⁢sign, as Wisconsin is a Republican-controlled Legislature. However, he ​vetoed the current map.

The ​court announced that it will begin adopting the remedial maps so ⁣that they can⁢ be used for⁤ the upcoming 2024 election.

Stay ‌informed! Receive ‍breaking news blasts ⁣directly to‍ your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

All⁢ eyes ⁤will be on ⁣the U.S. Supreme Court after the Colorado Supreme Court voted four-to-three to disqualify former President Trump from the⁤ primary ballot citing the Constitution’s ⁤14th⁤ Amendment ⁢insurrection clause.

Some of ⁤the Americans freed in the prisoner swap with Venezuela are ⁤back ⁤on U.S. soil.

Since the start of December, Customs and Border Patrol has reportedly ⁢encountered‍ more than 200,000 migrants at the‍ Southern Border. ⁤

Fallout continues from the ⁤Colorado Supreme⁣ Court’s decision to remove 45th President Donald Trump from the​ ballot. Article Three Project​ founder Mike⁤ Davis highlights that‌ among many things the decision violated‌ President Trump’s due process rights.

December ⁣22, 2023 – 6:05 AM PST HONG KONG ⁢(Reuters) –⁢ Chinese regulators announced ⁢on Friday a wide range of rules aimed…

One of the main bottlenecks for Tesla is⁢ the speed it can​ make the 4680 batteries used in ​the Cybertruck‌ with its new dry-coating technology.

A group of ⁢11‍ nonfiction authors have joined a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court that accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of ​misusing books the‌ authors have ​written to train their models.

San Francisco police ⁤Sergeant David Radford contacted Tesla about⁣ data ⁤on‍ an alleged stalker’s remote access to a⁢ vehicle.

rnrn

What challenges do ⁤Republicans face in crafting new maps that comply with the court’s ⁢ruling and receive approval from ⁣both the court and the Democratic governor

Title: Wisconsin ⁣Supreme Court ⁢Overturns​ Republican-Drawn Legislative Maps

Introduction:

On December 22, 2023, the‌ left-leaning Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered an early Christmas gift to Democrats in Wisconsin by voting to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps. ⁢The decision, approved by a vote of 4-3, entails the creation of newly-drawn district boundary lines. Democrats⁢ had challenged the constitutionality of the maps, arguing that they violated contiguity requirements ⁢and the separation of powers doctrine. This landmark ruling has significant implications for Wisconsin’s political landscape and upcoming elections.

Background:

Wisconsin Democrats have long contended⁢ that the Republican-drawn maps were unfair and ‌rigged. Liberal Justice Janet‌ Protasiewicz had even publicly criticized them as such. The lawsuit to redistrict the boundary lines was filed shortly after the court flipped to a ‍Democrat majority in ⁤August.

Court​ Ruling:

In her majority opinion, Justice Jill Karofksy wrote that the current state legislative districts contained separate and detached territory, thus⁣ violating the constitution’s contiguity requirements. ⁤As a ‌result, the court ordered‌ the⁢ Wisconsin Elections Commission to refrain from using the current legislative maps in future elections. The ruling effectively declared the Republican-drawn maps unconstitutional.

Implications and Reactions:

The overturn of ⁢the maps ⁤has immense implications for Wisconsin’s political landscape. With Governor Tony​ Evers being a Democrat and the state legislature under Republican control, passing new maps that comply with the court’s ruling is crucial. While the governor has the power to veto these maps, it remains to be seen how the political dynamics will unfold.

Looking ahead:

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has announced its intention to adopt remedial maps in time for the upcoming 2024 election. These‍ new maps will be used to ensure fair representation and​ address the concerns raised by Democrats regarding the previous maps. Consequently, all eyes will be on the court’s redistricting process and its ⁤impact ⁤on the state’s future political landscape.

Conclusion:

The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Republican-drawn legislative maps sends a powerful message about ⁤fairness⁤ and adherence to constitutional requirements. Democrats celebrate the⁢ ruling ⁣as a victory for Wisconsin’s democracy,⁤ while Republicans face the challenge‌ of crafting new maps that receive approval from both the court and the governor. As the state prepares ‍for the 2024⁣ election, all stakeholders will closely monitor the redistricting process and its implications for political representation⁢ in Wisconsin.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker