Biggs and Buck withdraw support for police resolution they proposed because of amendment.
Republican Representatives Vote Against Own Police Resolution
Two Republican representatives, Reps. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) and Ken Buck (R-CO), co-sponsored a resolution that aimed to recognize the bravery of law enforcement officers and condemn calls to defund or abolish the police. However, the resolution was amended at the last minute, causing the two representatives to vote against their own resolution.
What Happened?
Biggs explained in a tweet that the amendment “federalizes … certain aspects of local police enforcement,” which goes against the original intent of the resolution. Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (R-NY) added an amendment that advocates for local law enforcement officers to have certain rights to ensure a fair administration of justice during investigations into their conduct.
The Point of the Resolution
Biggs emphasized that the federal government should not interfere with the policies and procedures of local law enforcement unless there is a violation of civil rights. The resolution was approved in a 301-119-3 vote, with 87 Democrats supporting it, 117 opposing it, and three voting present.
Why It Matters
- The resolution aimed to recognize the bravery of law enforcement officers and condemn calls to defund or abolish the police.
- The last-minute amendment caused two Republican representatives to vote against their own resolution.
- The amendment advocates for local law enforcement officers to have certain rights during investigations into their conduct.
- The resolution was approved in a 301-119-3 vote.
It is important to recognize the bravery of law enforcement officers and ensure that they are protected during investigations into their conduct. However, the last-minute amendment to the resolution caused two Republican representatives to vote against their own resolution. The resolution was ultimately approved, but the amendment highlights the ongoing debate surrounding law enforcement policies and procedures.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...