Tennessee Advances Bill to Safeguard Customers from De-Banking for Religious or Political Reasons
A Tennessee Bill Aims to Protect Citizens from Political and Religious Discrimination by Banks
A proposed Tennessee bill that aims to prevent banks from discriminating against individuals based on their political or religious views has advanced in the state House. This development comes amidst growing concerns that financial institutions are unfairly targeting conservatives.
The bill, sponsored by Rep. Jason Zachary, a Republican from Knoxville, received a 5-1 vote in favor in the House’s Subcommittee on Banking and Consumer Affairs. Rep. Zachary expressed his worries about the alarming trend of freezing bank accounts due to religious or political beliefs. He emphasized the importance of putting an end to this dangerous practice in Tennessee, as it goes against the values of the state. He further stated that Tennessee Republicans are committed to safeguarding citizens’ right to freely express their convictions.
The proposed bill, known as HB2100, seeks to prohibit financial institutions from denying or canceling services based on speech, opinions, affiliations, religious beliefs, exercises, or affiliations. It aims to amend Tennessee’s consumer protection laws without affecting the quantitative factors already considered by banks. The bill was amended to exclude insurance companies from its provisions.
During the subcommittee hearing, Rep. Zachary highlighted ongoing cases in which customers in Tennessee have faced banking restrictions. He emphasized the significance of the legislation in protecting the well-being of Tennesseans and ensuring they are not subjected to discrimination. He challenged banks that claim not to engage in such practices, stating that they should have no issue with the bill.
Additional testimony was provided by Chris Lee of the National Shooting Sports Foundation and Chris Holmes, CEO of FirstBank. Lee supported the bill, citing instances where financial institutions targeted the firearm industry. He referenced Citigroup’s gun policies implemented in 2018, which refused to work with partners involved in certain firearm sales. Despite Citigroup’s attempts to rally support from other financial institutions, they were unsuccessful.
Holmes, who opposes the bill, expressed concerns about burdensome regulations and the potential requirement for banks to work with businesses involved in pornography or marijuana. Rep. Zachary clarified that banks could still enforce their own policies regarding such entities. He specified that the bill only applies to banks with assets exceeding $100 billion.
The bill, backed by organizations like the Alliance Defending Freedom and the National Committee for Religious Freedom, will now proceed to the House Commerce Committee.
This proposal coincides with congressional investigations into allegations that federal law enforcement pressured financial institutions to monitor the financial transactions of supporters of former President Donald Trump and individuals who visited outdoor stores like Cabela’s and Bass Pro Shops.
RELATED: Religious Liberty Advocates Warn Tennessee Lawmakers About Dangers Of Politically Motivated ‘De-Banking’
What are some concerns raised by critics regarding the potential impact of this bill on banks’ ability to assess risks and their discretion in choosing customers
Idered by banks when extending services, such as creditworthiness, risk assessment, or other legitimate business criteria.
The motivation behind the bill stems from numerous incidents across the country where individuals with conservative viewpoints have faced discrimination by banks. This includes cases of freezing bank accounts and denying services solely based on their political or religious affiliations. Critics argue that this represents a clear infringement on free speech and the right to religious freedom.
This issue has gained national attention, with several high-profile cases highlighting the need for legislative action. One such case involved a Florida-based bank that closed the accounts of conservative activists, citing concerns over reputational risk. This incident, along with others, has raised concerns about the potential abuse of power by financial institutions to target individuals based on their ideological beliefs.
The proposed bill in Tennessee aims to address this problem directly by explicitly prohibiting banks from engaging in discrimination based on political or religious views. By doing so, it seeks to reinforce the fundamental principles of fairness, equality, and tolerance that form the bedrock of American democracy.
Supporters of the bill argue that banks should not serve as arbiters of free speech or religious expression. They contend that individuals have the right to hold and express their political or religious beliefs without fear of retaliation from their financial institutions.
However, critics of the bill raise concerns about potential unintended consequences. They argue that such legislation might hinder banks’ ability to assess risks properly, potentially leading to adverse effects on their financial stability. Additionally, opponents argue that banks should have the discretion to choose the customers they feel comfortable doing business with, within the confines of existing anti-discrimination laws.
Nevertheless, the bill has gained significant support in Tennessee, particularly among conservative lawmakers. Advocates argue that protecting citizens from political or religious discrimination by banks is a necessary step to ensure the preservation of personal liberties.
The advancement of the bill in the state House Subcommittee on Banking and Consumer Affairs is an encouraging development for its proponents. However, it still faces further deliberation and potential amendments before becoming law.
If passed, this bill would mark an important milestone in the protection of individual freedoms. It would send a clear message that discrimination based on political or religious views is not only unacceptable but also illegal. By safeguarding the rights of citizens to express their beliefs without fear of financial repercussions, Tennessee would set a precedent for other states to follow.
Ultimately, this bill represents an important step towards creating a fair and inclusive society. It is a reminder of the ongoing battle to uphold the principles of free expression and religious freedom, even in the realm of financial services. While the road ahead remains challenging, the potential passage of this bill would be a significant victory for those who believe in the fundamental values that underpin the American democratic system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...