New bipartisan effort aims to eliminate third-party challenge in 2024
Bipartisan Group Targets Third-Party Contenders in Ad
A bipartisan group called “Citizens to Save Our Republic” has launched a powerful ad campaign aimed at third-party presidential contenders, including the influential group No Labels. The ad, released on Monday, warns that supporting these candidates could lead to a second term for former President Donald Trump.
Led by former House minority leader Richard A. Gephardt, a Missouri Democrat, the group plans to spend $100,000 on the ad buy in Washington, D.C., with potential plans to expand to swing states next year. Gephardt expressed concerns about third-party candidates, emphasizing the group’s right to inform citizens about the risks associated with voting for them.
Attacking Prominent Figures and No Labels
The ads specifically target attorney and Kennedy clan member Robert F. Kennedy Jr., scholar Cornel West, and Green Party leader Jill Stein, along with No Labels. One ad labels Trump as the “anti-democracy candidate” and argues that these individuals and No Labels will inadvertently aid Trump by siphoning votes away from President Joe Biden.
Another ad focuses solely on No Labels, criticizing the organization as a “dark money” effort due to its lack of donor disclosure. While No Labels has not announced any presidential candidates yet, there are reports that Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and former Maryland governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, are considering seeking the group’s bipartisan ticket. No Labels aims to secure ballot access in all 50 states by next fall.
No Labels Stays Focused on the Majority
No Labels senior adviser Ryan Clancy responded to the ad campaign, stating that while the group welcomes the opposition’s efforts, their focus remains on the majority of Americans who desire more choices in the 2024 election. Clancy dismissed the ad as targeting party insiders in Washington, while No Labels aims to engage with the rest of the country.
Former Sen. Joe Lieberman, the founding chairman of No Labels, mentioned on Fox News that the group would be enthusiastic if former United States Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley decided to run on their ticket. However, Haley has pledged her support to the Republican nominee for president.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What are the arguments made by critics of the ad campaign, and how do they view the targeting of third-party contenders as limiting voter choice and perpetuating a duopoly in American politics
Is comprised of prominent politicians from both major parties who are concerned about the potential impact of third-party candidates on the upcoming presidential election. The ad, which features images of the chaos and division that characterized Trump’s presidency, is intended to dissuade voters from supporting candidates outside of the two major parties.
The decision to target third-party contenders, particularly No Labels, stems from the belief that these candidates could potentially siphon off votes from the Democratic candidate, thereby benefiting Trump. No Labels, a bipartisan political organization, has gained significant traction in recent years, advocating for policy solutions that transcend party lines. However, this new ad argues that supporting No Labels and similar candidates would ultimately undermine the progress made during President Joe Biden’s first term and pave the way for Trump’s comeback.
The bipartisan group behind the ad argues that in the current political climate, it is crucial for voters to unite behind a single candidate who can ensure stability, unity, and progress for the country. They assert that the 2020 presidential election demonstrated the dangers of diluting the vote and the potential consequences of divided support. Pointing to the narrow margin by which Biden won key swing states, they assert that any diversion of votes away from the Democratic candidate could prove disastrous in the next election.
Critics of this ad campaign argue that it seeks to stifle diversity of thought and limit choice for voters. They claim that third-party candidates provide alternatives for those who are dissatisfied with the major parties and their platforms. Supporters argue that this bipartisan group, by targeting third-party contenders, is perpetuating the duopoly that has long dominated American politics and is inherently undemocratic. They contend that voters should have the right to support candidates who align with their values, regardless of party affiliation.
Nevertheless, the ad campaign has sparked a broader conversation about the role of third-party candidates in American politics and the potential consequences of voting outside of the two major parties. It highlights the persistent dilemma faced by voters who may be torn between supporting a candidate they truly believe in versus strategically voting for a candidate who has a higher chance of defeating their least preferred option.
As the 2022 midterm elections approach and the 2024 presidential race looms on the horizon, the influence of third-party candidates will likely continue to be a topic of discussion and debate. Bipartisan groups like ”Citizens to Save Our Republic” will continue to argue the importance of unity and strategic voting to prevent another term for Trump, while critics will continue to advocate for alternatives and the preservation of political diversity.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...