Black Kamala Harris Staffers Allege They Faced ‘Outright Racial Discrimination’ from Campaign
The text critiques the Democratic Party, particularly focusing on issues within Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign during the 2024 election. It suggests that the party has created internal divisions by emphasizing identity-based grievances, leading to complaints from black staffers about racial discrimination and feeling ignored. A New York times report highlighted that these staffers took part in a last-minute door-knocking campaign due to dissatisfaction with the campaign’s efforts to mobilize black and Latino voters, whom they felt were taken for granted. the critique extends to the idea that both campaign officials and staffers exhibited forms of racism — the former by assuming support from minority groups without adequate engagement, and the latter by focusing on racial identities over unity as Americans.The text concludes that both parties need to recognize and address these dynamics if the Democrats intend to halt losses in future elections.
A monster of its own creation has already begun to devour the Democratic Party.
Obsessed with identity-based grievances, Democrats have ironically cultivated those same grievances against their own leaders from inside their own ranks.
According to The New York Times, the post-election autopsy on Vice President Kamala Harris’s failed campaign included a survey in which some of Harris’s black staff members “complained of outright racial discrimination.”
Many of those staffers, in fact, “felt that their ideas were ignored at a rate far higher than their peers.’”
Did Harris campaign officials disproportionately ignore their black staffers’ ideas?
On one hand, of course, the very raising of that question reflects a broader phenomenon for which Democrats deserve blame.
In short, as a recent study suggested, when you train people to see racism everywhere, they will see racism everywhere.
On the other hand, can we rule out the possibility that Democratic Party higher-ups actually — ironically — harbor racial biases?
The context of the Times story suggests, at minimum, that the black staffers’ complaints had some merit.
For instance, in the days preceding the election, groups of staffers — led mostly by black organizers — in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, went “rogue.” The Times called these efforts “extraordinary acts of insubordination against the Harris campaign.”
In short, staffers expressed alarm at “a stunning breakdown” in the campaign’s get-out-the-vote operation.
Relegated to making phone calls that they perceived as pointless or even counterproductive, those staffers took it upon themselves to secretly organize a last-minute, door-knocking campaign in an attempt to bring out black and Latino voters who had historically voted Democrat.
Of course, that alone does not prove or even suggest racism.
It does suggest, however, that the Harris campaign took its base of black and Latino voters for granted.
Meanwhile, the vice president focused primarily on attracting voters who d Democrat elites’ hatred of President-elect Donald Trump. After all, why else would she have campaigned with former Republican congresswoman and Trump nemesis Liz Cheney?
Thus, the Harris campaign did engage in racism, though not for reasons the black staffers believed.
By taking black and Latino voters for granted, Harris campaign officials behaved as if they owned those votes. That is precisely the sort of racism elitists often exhibit.
At the same time, by focusing on voters’ skin color, those aggrieved staffers also engaged in racism.
In the end, only Trump had a message tailored to Americans as Americans rather than members of identity-based groups. The longer they fail to see that, the more Democrats will lose.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...