Washington Examiner

Boebert warns of recall against Colorado secretary of state after Supreme Court ruling

Colorado Republicans ⁢Threaten Recall of ‍Secretary of State Over Trump Ballot Removal

Rep. ⁣Lauren Boebert (R-CO)​ is leading a ⁢group of Colorado Republicans in a⁣ bold move to recall Colorado ‍Secretary of​ State Jena Griswold. Their outrage stems from⁤ Griswold’s decision to remove former President Donald Trump from the state ballot.

“Instead of fulfilling her oath of office to encourage Coloradans to ‌make their voices heard, she abused ⁣her office for selfish⁢ political decisions ⁤to ​rig​ the primary election against ​President Donald​ J.‍ Trump,” Boebert wrote, according ⁤to the Hill.

To initiate a recall effort, the Republicans must gather a ⁣staggering 621,000 valid signatures on a ⁢petition. Boebert, along with Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dave Williams, state party Vice Chairwoman ⁢Hope ‍Scheppelman, and GOP Secretary Anna Ferguson, ‌have all‍ signed the letter in support of the recall.

Griswold spearheaded the effort⁢ to keep⁢ Trump off the primary ballot in Colorado, a move that was initially backed by the state Supreme Court. However, their ⁣victory was short-lived as the U.S. Supreme ​Court unanimously ruled that states cannot prevent a ⁢presidential candidate from appearing on the ​ballot under the 14th Amendment. This amendment was invoked due to Trump’s alleged involvement in ⁤the ‍Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Expressing her disappointment in the ruling, Griswold argued that ⁢states should have the power to exclude those‍ who​ participated ⁢in ​or led​ an insurrection.⁣ However, ⁤it is important‌ to note that Trump has not been convicted of insurrection, and none of the‌ Jan. 6 rioters have been charged with insurrection.

“My larger reaction is disappointment. I do believe that states should be‌ able, under our ⁤Constitution, to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists,” Griswold told MSNBC. “Ultimately, this​ decision leaves open the door for ‍Congress to act to pass authorizing legislation, but we know that Congress is a nearly ‍nonfunctioning body,⁤ so ultimately, it will be up to the American voters to save⁢ our democracy in November.”

This ruling not ⁣only affects Colorado but also puts a halt‍ to similar ⁤efforts in other states like Maine and Illinois.

Read more from The Washington Examiner:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/

How do Republicans view the ⁤removal ​of former President Trump from the state ballot and what precedent do they ⁢believe it sets?

E has chosen to⁢ silence the voice of a former President,” Boebert said ⁢in a ‌statement. “This blatant act of political ⁣bias and suppression‌ of free speech cannot go unanswered.”

Griswold, a Democrat, made the controversial decision to remove Trump from the state ‌ballot based⁣ on concerns over his involvement in the January ‌6th Capitol riot. She argued that⁢ Trump’s rhetoric incited the violence and undermined the democratic process. However, ⁤many Republicans ⁢see this as a direct attack on their ⁤party and an infringement⁤ on their right‍ to vote for their chosen candidate.

The recall effort, organized⁢ by Boebert and supported by⁣ several Republican lawmakers, is a response to what they view as Griswold’s partisan actions. They believe that she should be‍ held accountable for manipulating the election process for political ‌gain. ‍Additionally, they argue that removing a former ‍President from the ballot sets ⁣a dangerous precedent and undermines the democratic principles upon which the country was ⁢founded.

This recall attempt comes as ⁤part⁢ of a wider‌ backlash against the ‌Republican Party’s⁤ actions regarding the ‌2020 election. Many Republicans,⁣ including former President Trump, have raised concerns about voter fraud and irregularities in several states, including Colorado. While‍ these claims have been ​largely debunked, they⁢ have fueled ⁣a sense of ‌distrust ‌and division⁣ among Republicans.

Colorado is not the only state where Republicans are seeking to recall officials they believe acted unethically ‌in the 2020 election. Similar efforts are underway in other states, ⁤such as Arizona⁣ and Georgia, where Republicans ‌have contested the outcome of ⁢the presidential race.⁣ These recall efforts demonstrate the deep divisions within the ‍Republican Party and the extent to which some members are willing to go to challenge the legitimacy of⁢ the election.

However, critics argue ​that these recall efforts are baseless ​and only serve to further divide and polarize the country. They claim that ⁢the allegations of voter‍ fraud have been thoroughly investigated ‍and⁣ disproven, and that these ⁢attempts to remove duly elected officials‌ are undermining the democratic process ⁢itself.

Supporters of the recall⁢ effort argue that holding officials accountable for their actions, particularly in regard to election integrity,​ is essential for a functioning democracy. ⁤They believe ​that⁣ Griswold’s decision was politically motivated and that ⁤she should be removed from office to restore ​public trust in the electoral process.

Whether or not the recall effort is​ successful remains to be seen, ‌but ‍it​ highlights the ongoing debate⁤ and division within the ‌Republican Party over⁤ the 2020 election. Regardless of the outcome, this‌ controversy serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding‌ democratic principles and maintaining‌ public trust‌ in ⁢the electoral process.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker