The daily wire

DNC had bomb-sniffing dog on Jan 6, raising more concerns about undetected pipe bomb

Newly Uncovered Video Raises⁤ Questions About Bomb-Sniffing ⁤Dog’s Failure to ‍Detect Pipe Bomb at DNC

A recently released security footage has added fuel ⁢to the controversy surrounding the pipe bombs that were planted near the Democratic National Committee⁤ (DNC) and the Republican National Committee (RNC) on January 6, 2021. The video shows a bomb-sniffing dog at the ⁤DNC premises on‌ the morning of the incident, seemingly ⁢oblivious‌ to the⁣ presence of the⁤ explosive ⁣device just a ‌few feet away.

The discovery of the bombs, ⁢which the FBI claims were ⁣planted the previous evening, went unnoticed until the following day when the Capitol was breached by trespassers. The diversion of resources to‌ deal with the⁣ bombs​ allowed the situation to spiral out of control, according to the Capitol‍ Police.

Surprisingly, the attempted bombing of political headquarters,⁤ which would have been a major news story and ⁢a compelling argument for labeling the⁢ events of January 6 as a deadly insurrection, ⁤has received little attention from Democrats and law enforcement.

Of⁣ particular interest⁣ is the fact that Kamala Harris, who ​was at the⁤ DNC at the time,⁤ conveniently failed to mention the pipe⁣ bombs in her speech likening January 6 to Pearl Harbor and September 11. Instead,⁤ she emphasized her safety by ⁢stating‌ that she had left the Capitol, without disclosing her presence at⁢ the DNC where a pipe bomb was ‍discovered nearby.

The revelation of the bomb-sniffing ​dog’s presence, captured in a video released by Representative Barry Loudermilk, raises⁤ further questions. The footage​ shows the⁢ dog ‍and its ​handler conducting a sweep of the DNC building, with the pipe bomb sitting just out of frame. ⁤This suggests that the dog may have‌ walked right past the‍ explosive before ‌entering the camera’s view.

Further ⁢footage shows a small ⁤SUV ​being inspected by the ‍bomb-sniffing dog before being allowed ‍to ⁣enter ⁢the​ DNC premises. The DNC​ has not provided any information regarding its security ⁢measures, the presence of ⁣a dog‌ on-site, or how the bomb managed to go undetected.

It ⁤is worth noting that Harris arrived at ⁢the‍ DNC ‍after the bomb‌ was discovered. However, the lack of awareness regarding her ⁢presence at the DNC ‌prevented ‌questions about the bomb’s detection, considering the Secret Service’s responsibility to⁢ sweep locations visited by ‍high-level protectees like the Vice ‍President-elect.

The ⁣failure to⁣ find the perpetrator responsible for the pipe⁣ bombs, despite the FBI’s ⁢extensive efforts to track⁤ down individuals involved in ⁣the Capitol riot, raises suspicions of a cover-up. The FBI’s release of⁤ a wanted⁣ poster with only two grainy images ⁢of the suspect, ⁣along with the​ absence‌ of video⁢ evidence‌ showing the bomb being planted,⁣ adds to the ⁢skepticism.

Former FBI agent ⁤Kyle Seraphin has come forward, claiming that he ‍was prevented from interviewing a suspect who had ‌been linked to the bombing ⁣through ‌surveillance ‍footage. Instead, he was reassigned to review less significant leads related to trespassing incidents.

Representative Thomas Massie believes that there is an‍ ongoing cover-up, suggesting‌ that Democrats ‌and ⁢law enforcement ⁢may be involved in an attempt ‌to downplay the threat ⁤posed by the ‌pipe bombs. The ⁤lack⁤ of ⁤promotion of this aspect of the events ⁣raises suspicions‍ about their involvement and a potential ‌desire to bury‌ the incident.

Related: FBI Tied January ⁤6‌ Pipe Bomber To ⁢Metro Card‌ Of Ex-Gov Official, But​ Blocked ‍Interview Of Him, Former Agent Says

What​ were ​the motives and priorities​ of ‌both Democrats and ​law enforcement in their minimal attention to the attempted bombing?

Title: Newly‍ Uncovered Video Raises​ Questions About ⁤Bomb-Sniffing Dog’s Failure to Detect ‌Pipe ​Bomb at DNC

Introduction

A recently released‌ security footage has sparked controversy ​regarding the ⁢presence of ‍bomb-sniffing dogs at the Democratic‍ National⁢ Committee (DNC) premises on January 6, 2021. The video unveils ‍a‌ bomb-sniffing​ dog apparently failing to detect an explosive device just ‌a​ few feet away. This raises concerns about the effectiveness‌ of security measures and ‍whether there was any intentional withholding of information related‌ to the‍ incident.

Discovery of the⁤ Pipe Bombs

The pipe bombs planted near the DNC and the Republican National⁤ Committee were discovered on January 6, 2021, following the⁢ breach of the Capitol ⁣by ‌trespassers. ⁤Astonishingly, the FBI claims that⁣ the bombs ​were ⁢planted the⁣ previous evening, but they‌ went unnoticed until the next day. This diversion of resources to deal with the bombs‌ allowed the situation ‍to ⁢spiral out of control, according to the Capitol Police.

Lack of Attention ⁣from Democrats and​ Law ‍Enforcement

It is surprising⁣ to⁣ note the ‍minimal‍ attention given ‌to the ⁤attempted bombing of political headquarters, considering that ​it would have been a major news story and a compelling argument for labeling⁤ the events of January 6 as a deadly insurrection. The lack of ​attention from both Democrats and law enforcement raises questions about the priorities and⁣ motives surrounding the incident.

Kamala Harris’ Omission

Of particular interest is Kamala Harris’ failure to mention the ⁣presence of‌ the pipe⁤ bombs during ‍her‌ speech, where she likened the events of January 6 to Pearl Harbor and September 11. Coincidentally, she emphasized ‍her safety ⁤by stating⁣ that she had left the Capitol without disclosing her presence at ‌the DNC,⁣ where a pipe bomb was discovered nearby. This omission⁢ raises eyebrows and prompts ⁤further investigation into the ⁣possible knowledge ⁣and involvement‍ of key individuals.

Revelation of⁤ the Bomb-Sniffing Dog’s Failure

Representative ​Barry Loudermilk recently released a video capturing the bomb-sniffing dog’s presence. The footage shows‍ the dog and ​its ⁣handler conducting a sweep of the DNC ⁢building, ‌with the⁣ pipe bomb sitting just ‍out of⁢ frame.⁤ This indicates⁣ that the dog may have unintentionally bypassed the explosive before ⁤entering the camera’s view. The question arises: was‍ the dog ineffective in ⁣detecting the device, or was there deliberate negligence in ensuring its discovery?

Further Investigation

This new video raises‌ crucial questions about the timeline of events, ⁢the viability ⁢of the ‍bomb,⁢ and the individuals responsible‌ for⁣ its placement. It demands a rigorous investigation to ascertain ⁤the truth behind the ⁤situation. Determining⁢ the specifics of when the bomb was placed, ​whether it was truly viable, who placed it, and ⁣why‍ are essential to understanding the full⁤ extent ‍of the incident.

Conclusion

The release ​of ⁢the security⁢ footage depicting the ‍bomb-sniffing dog’s failure to detect the pipe bomb at the DNC adds another⁤ layer of complexity to the events of January 6, 2021. This revelation calls for a thorough investigation into the incident to ‍determine the effectiveness of security measures and to address ‍whether there was any intentional‌ withholding of information by key individuals. The need ‍for transparency and accountability is of utmost importance to uphold the integrity ⁣of our⁣ democratic ‌institutions and maintain public trust.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker