Bombshell COVID-19 origins hearing will feature Wuhan lab leak and Fauci silencing effort

THe Wuhan lab leak Hypothesis will feature prominently in a House hearing regarding the coronavirus. Witnesses include well-known voices who have previously argued. COVID-19 It is likely that it originated in a Chinese lab.

Republican-led Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic A hearing will be held on “Investigating the Origins of COVID-19” It is expected to discuss not only the Wednesday Wuhan Institute of Virology However, gain-of-function research Funded by National Institutes of Health, The attempted silencing of the lab leak hypothesis Officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chinese obfuscation and obstruction.

WHAT WE KNOW ON THE WUHAN LAB LEAK DEBATE

“This investigation must begin with where and how this virus came about so that we can attempt to ‘predict, prepare, protect, or prevent’ it from happening again,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R–OH), chairman Statement of the Subcommittee Washington Examiner. “Government scientists and government funded researchers have so far been less-than-forthcoming in their knowledge and actions, including work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and potential pandemic pathogens.”

Redfield was the former director. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Who has spoken out about COVID-19? “clearly” The Wuhan Lab was the first, and Nicholas Wade, the ex-science editor at the, also helped. New York TimesThe author of the following article is? “substantial” Evidence of a laboratory leakage

Jamie Metzl is also testifying. Jamie Metzl is a former member of Clinton White House National Security Council who long believed that the Wuhan lab leaked and therefore must be investigated.

After Christopher Wray, FBI Director, the hearing will take place confirmed It was revealed that COVID-19 is believed to have originated in China by the FBI, which the FBI confirmed last week. “low confidence” That the coronavirus started at a Wuhan lab.

These assessments are the first since the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published an assessment in 2021 that stated the existence of one U.S. intelligence agent, the FBI. assessed with “moderate confidence” COVID-19 most likely emerged from a lab in Wuhan, While four U.S. surveillance agencies and the National Intelligence Council believed that they were right, “low confidence” COVID-19 was most likely of natural origin.

These assessments will likely be addressed by witnesses on Wednesday.

Redfield told Fox News reported last month by Fox News that both the FBI and Energy Department had a meeting. “an enormous, powerful, scientific workforce” And “a lot of science depth” an agency. Trump CDC former director also added “I think that clearly the origin of this virus was a leak from the Wuhan lab, and eventually people will come to realize that. … COVID came into man and immediately was enormously transmissible, which in my view meant that it was educated in a laboratory on how to infect human tissue.”

Last month, the former CDC director commented on his March 2021 public appraisal. This assessment also suggested that there might be some changes. COVID-19 was a product of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.

Wade is also an ex-editor at Science And NatureIt was penned by a lengthy essay For the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists Fauci, along with many others in the media tried to ignore the Wuhan-lab leak hypothesis in May 2021.

“The available evidence leans more strongly in one direction than the other,” Wade wrote the following at the time Wade discovered the lab leak hypothesis. “It seems to me that proponents of lab escape can explain all the available facts about SARS-CoV-2 considerably more easily than can those who favor natural emergence.”

Wade continued, “If the case that SARS-CoV-2 originated in a lab is so substantial, why isn’t this more widely known? … There are many people who have reason not to talk about it. The list is led, of course, by the Chinese authorities. But virologists in the United States and Europe have no great interest in igniting a public debate about the gain-of-function experiments that thei