Border Patrol Chief reinstated amid retaliation allegations following his removal.

A U.S. Border Patrol agent has been reinstated to his ‌post ⁢as the chief of the El Centro, California border sector⁤ more ⁣than a month after Republican lawmakers raised the prospect that he was the ​target of political retaliation.

On Monday,

House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer ⁢(R-Ky.)

and

House Homeland Security Committee Chair Mark Green (R-Tenn.)

announced that Gregory ‌Bovino was allowed to return to his post as the chief patrol agent for ​the El Centro Sector.

Mr. Bovino had served‍ as⁢ the top Border Patrol agent at the‌ El Centro Sector since 2020 but was removed from the post last month and ‍reassigned to a headquarters position.

The timing of Mr. Bovino’s reassignment raised suspicion among some Republicans as it came within hours of him testifying before Congress about security conditions along the U.S. southern border.

In a ⁢letter (pdf) to acting U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Troy Miller last month, ‌Mr. Comer and Mr. ‍Green shared allegations from a whistleblower that Mr. Bovino’s new ⁤assignment​ is “one of no certain mission, ‍no articulable purpose, and without any timeline of ⁢completion.”

“The whistleblower further alleges that this ​practice ‌is consistent with the way in which CBP officials have dealt with⁣ employees who they wish to leave the agency, by placing‍ maximum pressure on ​them to relocate, retire, or resign,” the Republican lawmakers added in their July letter.

Mr. Comer and ​Mr. Green celebrated the apparent ‍reversal in CBP decision-making that allowed Mr. ​Bovino to return to his post at the El Centro Sector.

“We congratulate ‌Chief Bovino on his rightful reinstatement as⁤ Chief⁤ Patrol Agent‍ for the El Centro ⁢Sector and look forward to his continued dedicated leadership with Border Patrol,” the Republican lawmakers said in a Monday press statement.

“The credible and unacceptable ‍allegations of retaliation against ⁢Chief Bovino for simply shining‍ a light on the Biden administration’s historic border⁢ crisis confirms the importance of our Committees’ crucial ⁤oversight effort on behalf of‍ the American people. Any retaliation ‌against witnesses who cooperate with ​Congressional inquiries will not be tolerated.”

Testimony ⁢Battle

Mr. Bovino was‌ one of several ‍Border Patrol sector chiefs invited to ⁤testify ​at a House Oversight Committee hearing earlier this year, ‌but Mr. Comer ‍ accused Homeland Security⁣ Secretary Alejandro‌ Mayorkas ⁤of blocking some⁤ of the Border Patrol​ officials from doing​ so. Rio Grande Valley Sector Border Patrol Chief Gloria⁣ Chavez and Tucson ⁣Sector Chief John Modlin did testify, but ‍Mr. Bovino and ⁤others did ⁢not appear at the hearing.

“It is unfortunate that you⁢ are​ trying to prevent the American people from hearing candid and truthful testimony of U.S. Border Patrol Chief Patrol Agents,” Mr. Comer wrote in a​ Jan. ‍27 letter ​(pdf) to Mr. Mayorkas. “This ⁢is necessary oversight,‌ which you and your Department ​are attempting to block.”

After ‌Mr. Bovino and other Border Patrol officials were⁤ blocked from attending the Feb. 7 hearing, Mr. Comer​ sent a letter (pdf) to⁢ Mr. Miller, requesting that he help facilitate interview times for Mr. Bovino and the other ⁣Border Patrol⁢ officials. ‌Mr. Bovino appeared before Congress⁣ for‍ a transcribed interview on July 12, ‌shortly before he was informed that he would be reassigned from the El ​Centro‍ Sector.

In their letter to ‍the CBP, Mr. Comer ⁤and Mr. Green alleged that, as they sought Mr. Bovino’s testimony ‍before Congress, the Border Patrol agent “may have produced written ‍testimony in preparation for this hearing ‌that was dissatisfactory to CBP officials: so much so that he ​was⁢ verbally reprimanded by headquarters officials.”

The Republican lawmakers asked Mr. Miller about the decision to reassign⁤ Mr. ‌Bovino, specifically requesting⁣ all documents and communications—including ​those involving the Department‍ of Homeland Security or White House officials—pertaining to whether or not Mr. Bovino⁢ could testify before Congress. The Republican lawmakers also asked for internal CBP documents detailing reasons for reassigning Mr.​ Bovino.

It’s ​not