According to New State legislation, California electric agencies propose that higher earners pay higher fees than lower earned employees.

A fixed-rate billing system was put forth by three electric utility companies in California, under which high-income households may be required to pay more.

Democrat governor of California Last summer, Gavin Newsom signed legislation mandating that energy resources include a” rate component” in their power bills in order to raise money for the state’s’s energy infrastructure. The Los Angeles Times reports that the law mandates” a fixed monthly cost based on household income.” The California Public Utilities Commission may review a proposal put forth by the middle of the following year that aims to lower prices for the majority of households by levying higher rates on wealthier families. It was reportedly introduced by Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric.

According to SDG & E CEO Caroline Winn,” fundamental change is required to provide bill relief. We have listened to and heard from our customers.” Clients who live paycheck to paycheck and struggle to pay for necessities like energy, houses, and bread were back and foundation in our minds when we were putting up the reform plan.

In SCE and PG & E areas, California households with annual incomes under$ 28,000 would pay a$ 15 fixed fee on their monthly electric bills, while in SDG andE regions, it would cost$ 24 per month. Families with annual incomes between$ 28 000 and$ 69 000 would pay$ 30 per month in PG & E areas,$ 34 in SDG / E, and$ 20 for SCE areas. In contrast, those with incomes between$ 69, 000 and$ 190,000 would pay$ 51 per month in SCE and PG & E areas and$ 73 per monthly in the SDG & E areas.

According to information provided by local news outlets, households with annual incomes greater than$ 180,000 would be subject to the harshest monthly fees, which would amount to$ 85 per month in SCE areas,$ 92 per monthly in PG & E regions, and$ 128 each month.

In a different speech, SCE CEO Steven Powell stated that” we understand that our clients are dealing with rising rates of all kinds and are working to keep customers’ taxes as reasonable as possible.” An income-based fixed cost, according to SCE, will benefit millions of customers, especially those who are most in need of power act relief. Additionally, it will facilitate the affordability of clean power systems for more Californians.

According to the legislation, California experiences system problems as a result of” extreme events from climate change, including heat waves, fire, and drought, combined with many things, such as supply chain disruptions ,” despite being” a leader in driving the cheaper and just transition to an empty, dependable energy system.”

According to a Tax Foundation analysis, California is one of the most heavily taxed states in the nation with an effective tax rate of 13.5 %. According to another studies from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the state also has one of the most advanced income taxation systems in the country, which means that rich households account for a larger portion of state income than other households.

TO GET THE Every Cable APP, CLICK HERE

During the midterm elections, voters in California reportedly rejected a ballot measure that would have increased the tax burden for millionaires, but they did approve one that imposed the” house tax” for the purchase of some upscale real estate. A” global wealth” income, which would be imposed on both current and former California individuals based on the value of assets like stocks, saving accounts, work items, and pension funds, is one of more recent legislative proposals.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases