California to Speed Up Housing Project Approval in Coastal Cities, Fire Zones

California Expands Streamlined Approval Process for Affordable‍ Housing Projects

Since 2018, ​California ​cities that have failed to meet state-mandated housing goals have provided developers​ with a streamlined approval process for affordable or multifamily housing​ projects. After the recent approval of a ⁢new law, coastal and fire zones that were previously excluded will now be eligible for ‍the same.

Senate Bill 423, authored ⁢by⁤ Sen. ‌Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), will extend the former law that expires after 2025 ​by a decade and include some coastal and fire hazard zones. Gov. ‍Gavin Newsom signed ⁢the bill into law Oct. ​11.

“California desperately needs to ramp ​up housing production, and the Governor’s ‍action today‍ helps put us on a path to achieve​ that⁢ goal,” said Mr. Wiener in ⁣a press release the day his ​bill received ‌the governor’s signature. “The era of saying no to housing is coming to an end. ‌We’ve ​been planting seeds for years to get ​us to a⁣ brighter housing future, and today we’re continuing strongly down that path.”

Related Stories

• Newsom Signs ⁣California ‘Stable Affordable Housing Act’

  10/18/2023

• California Allocates Nearly $180 Million to Creating 710 Housing Units for Homeless

  10/12/2023

Under goals set forth ​by ⁣the ⁣state’s housing ⁢department,‌ California must ‌build 2.5⁤ million new homes in the next eight years, including 1 million for families earning low to very low incomes.

Brian Hanlon, CEO of‍ California YIMBY, an acronym for ⁢“Yes in‍ My Back Yard”—a ​nonprofit that pushes pro-housing policies—said he believes the new law will help bring ⁣affordable homes to the state.

“Governor Newsom has‌ made it clear that he supports making it faster, ⁤easier, ⁣and⁤ less expensive to build affordable homes in our⁤ coastal cities … With SB ‌423 ​now law, many ‍more Californians from‌ all walks of ‌life will⁤ be​ able to afford to live—and⁤ thrive—in ‍the Golden State,” he said in the same⁢ press release.

While SB 423 would remove the exclusion⁤ of coastal zones, ‌areas identified as⁣ environmentally ‍sensitive—such as those that could be affected by sea level rise—would still ‌be exempt.

The bill would ​also streamline⁤ approval of projects in fire ‌risk‍ zones—as⁤ identified by the state’s Department of Forestry and Fire Protection—so​ long as local and state-mandated fire mitigation ‍protections​ are in place, according to an analysis of ​the bill.

The League ⁣of California Cities—a nonprofit advocating⁣ for cities across California—in a May ​letter opposed the bill​ alongside 108 other cities, stating it and the existing law create a one-size-fits-all​ approach that’s harmful​ to local‍ jurisdictions.

“SB ⁤423 is⁣ the latest overreaching⁣ bill. This measure would ⁣double-down ⁤on the recent trend of ⁤the⁣ state overriding ⁤its own mandated local housing plans by forcing ⁣cities ‌to approve certain‌ housing⁢ projects without regard to the needs of the community, opportunities for‍ environmental ⁣review, or ⁤public input,” they ⁢said in the⁣ letter.

They argued the new bill would not help the state meet its housing goals and ‍called on⁤ the governor and lawmakers⁤ to instead set aside $3 ​billion annually‍ in the state’s ‌budget ​for cities to spur residential‌ development.

“California ⁣will never produce ⁢the number of⁢ homes needed with an increasingly state driven,‍ by-right housing approval process. What is really‍ needed is a ‍sustainable state investment that matches⁢ the scale of this decades-in-the-making crisis,” they wrote.

The cities‌ of Newport Beach, ​Beverly Hills, Tustin, Palm⁢ Desert, San Clemente, Thousand Oaks, Apple Valley, Huntington Beach,‍ and 100 others were⁣ listed as⁤ opposed.

Councilman Casey‌ McKeon⁣ of Huntington Beach‍ told⁣ The⁢ Epoch Times he believes the new law​ is yet another one of the state’s⁤ overreaching ⁤policies that⁢ force housing in the wrong places.

“It’s ‌just another heavy-handed⁤ overreach from the ⁣state that violates our‌ local control. If they really want to⁤ develop affordable housing, they should encourage development in undeveloped ⁢areas and ⁤stop trying to jam more ⁢units ⁢into fully ‌developed cities,” he said.

While the City‌ of Costa Mesa didn’t register a position on the bill, Councilman ‌Don Harper ​said, personally, he’s against state-mandated policies that affect local control ‌over⁣ housing.

“If the state of California is going to mandate how we fulfill our housing needs, what’s the ⁢purpose ⁢of local ⁢government?” he told The Epoch Times.

Mr.⁢ Wiener additionally said in a September‌ press release the previous law on​ the issue has “proven one of the strongest tools in our toolbox ‍for‌ driving affordable housing ‌development.” According to the ‍senator, the older law has helped develop over 18,000 units⁣ of⁢ affordable housing in the four ⁣years since ‍it​ was⁢ passed in 2018.

According to an Assembly analysis,​ the older‍ law was⁢ limited ⁤in its ​effectiveness not‍ only because⁤ it excluded coastal ⁢and fire zones but due to increases in interest rates and building materials in the last few⁣ years, ⁤and certain labor​ requirements were also too strict.

But now under the new law some⁣ labor requirements have been removed.

The Oakland-based California Conference ​of Carpenters—which advocates for better working conditions for its workers—supported the bill and said it “will create massive work⁤ opportunities for current Union members and will also​ foster organizing opportunities unseen ⁢for ⁢decades.”

The new law becomes effective Jan. 1.

What are the potential benefits⁢ of extending⁣ the streamlined approval process to coastal and fire ‌zones ⁢in California?

Ente, and Pleasanton were among the cities that opposed the bill. They argued that the streamlined approval process takes away local‍ control and does not consider the unique needs and characteristics of‌ each community. They also expressed concerns about the potential impact on infrastructure, traffic, and schools.

Despite these concerns, proponents of the bill believe that​ it is a necessary step towards⁣ addressing the housing crisis in⁣ California. The state has been grappling with a severe shortage of‌ affordable housing, resulting in skyrocketing rents and a high rate ​of homelessness. By streamlining the approval process for affordable housing projects, it⁣ is hoped ⁤that more‍ homes can be built⁢ quickly and efficiently, making housing more affordable and ⁢accessible for Californians.

The extension of the streamlined approval process to coastal and fire zones is significant. These areas are often desirable places to live but‌ face unique challenges related to environmental risks. By including them in the streamlined process, ​it is expected that⁢ more affordable housing will​ be built in these areas, providing opportunities for people of all income levels to live there.

The‌ approval of⁣ Senate Bill 423 is seen as⁣ a step​ in the right direction for California’s housing goals. It signals a commitment from the state government to address the affordable housing crisis and recognizes the need for a streamlined approval process. However, it is also important to consider the concerns raised by cities and ensure⁢ that the ‌process is balanced and⁣ takes into account the specific needs of each community.

Moving forward, ⁢it will be crucial to monitor the implementation of ⁣the new law and assess its impact on housing production in California. It may ⁤require adjustments and refinements along the way to ensure that it is effective in achieving its​ intended goals. Ultimately, the success of the streamlined approval process will be measured by the number of affordable housing units that are built and the positive impact they have on California’s housing market.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases