California’s new concealed-carry ban disproportionately affects black individuals and women, violating their constitutional rights
California’s Ban on Concealed Handguns: A Threat to Self-Defense
As of Jan. 1, Californians are banned from carrying permitted concealed handguns in virtually the entire state. There is no evidence that permit holders have caused problems in California or elsewhere in the country, but the new law will prevent people from defending themselves. California has also jeopardized safety in recent years by cutting police budgets and electing district attorneys who refuse to prosecute violent criminals.
Restrictions on Carrying Concealed Handguns
- California now bans carrying concealed handguns in 26 types of locations, including parks, playgrounds, churches, banks, and zoos.
- Businesses are automatic gun-free zones unless they post signs that explicitly allow people to carry.
But to make sure that no one carries for protection, California’s attorney general enacted new emergency rules in December that will strip nearly all firearms trainers of their licenses to train. California mandates 16 hours of training to get a permit, and this requirement will now be very difficult to fulfill.
A federal district court judge issued a preliminary injunction against the new restrictions on where permit holders can carry, saying that the law is presumptively unconstitutional and unlikely to meet the precedent set by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision. This standard requires provisions to be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” Without explanation, however, a Democrat-dominated circuit court panel has stayed the injunction, allowing the new law to go into effect.
While California is making the whole state a gun-free zone, criminologists and economists who have published peer-reviewed research on gun control agreed that the top four policies to stop mass public shootings all involve getting rid of gun-free zones: Allow K-12 teachers to carry handguns, allow military personnel to carry on military bases, encourage the elimination of gun-free zones, and relax federal regulations that pressure companies to create gun-free zones.
Already having the country’s strictest gun-control laws, California probably shouldn’t present itself as a role model for the rest of the country. The periods after 2000, 2010, and 2020 show a consistent pattern: The per capita rate of mass public shootings in California is always greater than the rate for the rest of the country.
A new report by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) shows that there are now more than 21.8 million concealed handgun permits in the United States. Far more people carry guns today than in 2007 when there were only 4.6 million permits. The report also finds, “Outside of the restrictive states of California and New York, about 10.1 percent of adults have a permit.”
But this understates the increase in concealed carry, as 27 states now no longer require a permit to carry in all or most of the state. To get an idea of how many people are carrying, the CPRC hired McLaughlin & Associates to conduct a survey, which found that nationwide “15.6% of general election voters carry concealed handguns.”
Findings also suggest that “Concealed handgun permit holders are extremely law-abiding.” In Florida and Texas, permit holders are convicted of firearms-related violations one-twelfth as much as police officers.
Women are largely fueling the increase. Among the states that published data from 2012-22/23, the number of women with permits grew almost 111 percent faster than the number of men with permits. Among the states with 2023 data on sex, women now make up 29.1 percent of permit holders.
From 2015 to 2021/2022/2023, in the states that published data on race, the number of permits for black people increased nearly 223 percent faster than the number of permits for whites. Blacks now make up roughly 13 percent of permit holders. In addition, “Permits for Asians grew 163.4% faster than whites.”
The numbers show how out of sync California and New York are with the rest of the country. In those places, where public officials arbitrarily decide who gets a permit, only a few adults out of every thousand have permits (mostly in rural counties). People in most states don’t think twice about being surrounded by concealed carry in restaurants, theaters, or stores. In Potter County, Pennsylvania, on the New York state line, more than half of adults have a permit.
In 2013, LA Weekly obtained the names of permit holders in Los Angeles County, and the Crime Prevention Research Center did some investigating. There were 341 permits for almost 8 million adults. Only the political elite got them: judges, reserve deputy sheriffs, and a small group of very wealthy, well-connected individuals. I found that women got about 7.6 percent and blacks about 5 percent. Hispanics made up almost half of the county’s population, but they apparently only had about 6.5 percent of permits.
My research has demonstrated that the two groups that benefit the most from carrying guns are the likeliest victims of crime (low-income blacks in high-crime urban areas) and physically weaker people (women and the elderly). Dozens of published peer-reviewed studies find similar results. In the past few years, those who benefit the most from carrying concealed handguns have been getting them.
Police are the most important factor in fighting crime, but they almost always arrive on the scene after an offense. We have to let people protect themselves — and it shouldn’t just be a privilege of the wealthy and well-connected. The most vulnerable people are the ones who benefit the most from having guns.
Why banning guns is a bad idea?
Criminals, by definition, do not obey the law. Gun control laws only affect law-abiding people who go through legal avenues to obtain firearms. Criminals overwhelmingly obtain their firearms through illegal channels and will never be deterred by state and federal laws. Rly 68 percent faster than the number of permits for white people. This suggests that concealed carry permits are empowering marginalized communities and providing them with a means of self-defense.
Impact on Self-Defense
The ban on carrying concealed handguns in California poses a significant threat to the ability of individuals to defend themselves. By prohibiting the carrying of firearms in various locations such as parks, churches, and banks, the law effectively denies law-abiding citizens their right to protect themselves and their loved ones.
Studies have consistently shown that gun-free zones are vulnerable targets for criminals and mass shooters. By designating entire states, like California, as gun-free zones, policymakers are ignoring the evidence-based strategies that have been proven to deter such incidents. Allowing trained individuals, such as K-12 teachers and military personnel, to carry guns in specific locations has been demonstrated to be an effective deterrent. However, California’s restrictive policies prevent the implementation of these proven solutions.
Moreover, recent changes in California’s regulations that strip firearms trainers of their licenses severely limit the ability of individuals to obtain the necessary training required to obtain a concealed carry permit. By making it more difficult for people to fulfill the training requirements, the state effectively hinders law-abiding citizens from exercising their right to self-defense.
Questionable Effectiveness of Gun-Control Laws in California
California prides itself on having some of the strictest gun-control laws in the country. However, the results of these policies do not reflect their desired outcomes. Historical data consistently shows that California experiences higher rates of mass shootings compared to the rest of the country.
Furthermore, the Crime Prevention Research Center’s report highlights that the number of concealed handgun permits in the United States has increased significantly over the years, indicating a growing recognition and demand for self-defense options. This trend is particularly evident in states with more permissive concealed carry laws.
The report also underscores the law-abiding nature of concealed carry permit holders. They are statistically proven to have extremely low rates of firearms-related violations, even lower than those of police officers. This data contradicts the misconception that an increase in concealed carry permits results in increased crime rates.
Conclusion
California’s ban on carrying concealed handguns in numerous locations and the restrictive regulations surrounding training requirements are detrimental to the fundamental right of self-defense. The evidence from both research and real-world experiences indicates that gun-free zones are not effective in preventing violent incidents and that law-abiding citizens with concealed carry permits contribute to public safety.
It is crucial for policymakers to reassess their approach to gun control and acknowledge the importance of empowering individuals to defend themselves. By adopting evidence-based strategies that prioritize self-defense and removing unnecessary burdens on obtaining permits and training, states can create safer environments and protect the constitutional rights of their citizens.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
