Canadian court: Trudeau’s crackdown on trucker convoy violated federal law

Canadian Court Rules Trudeau’s Use of ​Emergencies Act to Target ⁤Truckers’ ​Vaccine Protest “Unreasonable” and Illegal

A Canadian court ruled on Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s utilization of a controversial federal law in early 2022 to target truckers protesting their industry’s Covid vaccine mandate was deemed “unreasonable” and illegal. Federal Court Justice ‌Richard Mosley wrote that the use of the Emergencies Act lacked justification, transparency, and intelligibility, concluding that there ‌was no ⁤national ‌emergency warranting its invocation. Mosley described the decision as “ultra vires,” meaning it‍ went beyond the scope‍ of the law.

In early 2022, Trudeau’s government implemented a series of Covid shot mandates, including a requirement for truckers crossing the U.S.-Canada border. This tyrannical mandate sparked‌ the “Freedom Convoy,” a‍ massive protest by Canadian truckers that culminated ​outside Parliament Hill in the nation’s capital.

Trudeau, infuriated by the peaceful protests, mobilized​ the Canadian military and state intelligence agencies to forcibly remove the demonstrators ⁤gridlocking Ottawa, using the ‍Emergencies Act. Additionally, Trudeau’s administration supported GoFundMe’s efforts to deplatform fundraising for the convoy and expanded terrorist ‌financing rules to target crowdfunding sites like GiveSendGo, baselessly claiming they​ were facilitating illegal blockades and damaging the Canadian economy.

Trudeau, who went into hiding upon the convoy’s arrival in Ottawa, also grossly smeared ⁤the protesters with leftist slanders, including accusations of antisemitism, Islamophobia, anti-Black racism, homophobia, and transphobia.

However, Trudeau’s abuse of the Emergencies Act exceeded what⁣ Canadian law permits. While the Act can be employed to manage a national emergency that cannot be effectively addressed ​by any other law, Mosley determined that Trudeau’s actions went far beyond that ⁣threshold.

Mosley further ruled that ⁣the government’s financial crackdown violated the demonstrators’ Charter rights by allowing unreasonable search and seizure of their financial information and freezing their ​bank and credit card accounts.

Unsurprisingly, the Canadian government plans​ to appeal the ruling, with Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland laughably claiming that the administration’s unlawful actions were necessary and legal due ⁢to ⁢a‌ supposed‌ threat to Canadian national security.

About the‌ Author

Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously ‍served as a state content writer for ​Convention of States Action, and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative ‍Review. Follow him on⁣ Twitter @ShawnFleetwood.

How did the truckers argue that the vaccine mandate violated their rights and freedoms?

Liament Hill in Ottawa. The truckers argued that the vaccine mandate violated their rights and freedoms, and they demanded the ‌government repeal‍ the requirement.

In response, Trudeau invoked the ‍Emergencies Act, a⁢ federal⁢ law that grants the government emergency powers during times of crisis. The Act allows the government to impose restrictions on‍ individuals and override certain constitutional rights⁣ and freedoms. Trudeau defended his‍ use ‌of the Act, stating that the Covid pandemic constituted an emergency‌ that warranted extraordinary measures.

However,⁣ Justice Mosley disagreed with Trudeau’s argument. In his‍ ruling, Mosley highlighted‍ the lack of evidence presented by the government to ‌support the necessity ‌of invoking the Emergencies Act. He pointed out that the Act specifies that there must be a public welfare emergency or a national emergency requiring the use of these⁣ powers. Mosley determined that the Covid pandemic, while serious, did not rise to the​ level ⁣of an emergency that justified the infringement of rights.

Furthermore, Mosley criticized Trudeau’s lack of transparency in his decision-making process. He noted that the government failed to​ provide clear and intelligible reasons for invoking the Emergencies‌ Act specifically to target the truckers’ protest. Mosley emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability, especially when‌ fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake.

The ruling‌ by Justice Mosley is an important victory for the⁢ truckers and their supporters, as it reaffirms the principle that no government, regardless of the situation, can trample on ​the rights and freedoms of its citizens without proper justification. Mosley’s decision​ serves as‍ a reminder to Trudeau and his⁣ government that they must adhere to the rule of law and respect the fundamental principles​ of democracy.

Moreover, this ruling has broader implications‌ for the use of emergency powers by governments around⁢ the world. It sets a precedent that these powers must be exercised with caution, and only when⁤ there is a genuine and immediate threat to public welfare or national security. It highlights the need for transparency and accountability in ⁤decision-making,‍ especially during times of crisis.

The truckers’ victory in challenging Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act is a testament ⁣to the power of the Canadian judicial system in upholding the rights and freedoms of its citizens. It demonstrates ‍the ⁤importance of an independent ⁤and impartial judiciary as a ‌safeguard against government ⁣overreach.

In conclusion, the Canadian court’s ruling against Trudeau’s use of the Emergencies Act to target truckers protesting the Covid vaccine mandate was a significant victory for ‍the truckers and a blow to the ⁤government’s heavy-handed approach. This case serves as a reminder that no government is above the law and that the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms is paramount, even in times⁢ of crisis. It ‍is a victory for the rule of law, transparency, and ‌accountability in governance.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases