No evidence from cell phone data suggests Willis and Wade lied about their relationship, says Fulton County DA
Attorneys Deny Claims of Relationship Between Trump’s Co-Defendants and Prosecutor
Attorneys representing the Fulton County district attorney’s office have vehemently denied allegations made by former President Donald Trump’s co-defendants. These claims suggest that recently discovered cellphone data proves a romantic relationship between the lawyer and the top prosecutor in the Georgia election subversion case, contradicting their initial statements.
Relevant Claims Dismissed
In a court ruling filed late Friday, representatives for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis dismissed the Trump camp’s claims as irrelevant and urged their removal from the case’s evidence.
Trump’s attorney, Steve Sadow, submitted a motion to the Washington Examiner, citing cellphone data and tower transmissions to track the lawyer’s movements. This evidence appears to contradict the lawyer’s previous testimony, where he claimed to have visited Willis’ condo no more than 10 times before being hired in November 2021.
Cellphone Data Misinterpreted
The prosecution responded by stating, “The records do nothing more than demonstrate that Special Prosecutor Wade’s telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located.”
“The records do not prove, in any way, the content of the communications between Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade was ever at any particular location or address; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis were ever in the same place during any of the times listed,” the prosecution continued.
The district attorney’s office also raised concerns about the legality of how the Trump team obtained the cellphone information mentioned in their motion.
Willis hired Wade as a special prosecutor for the 2020 election investigation into Trump. Between 2022 and 2023, Wade received over $600,000 from the district attorney’s office. The Trump legal team alleges that the romantic relationship between Wade and Willis began before 2022, arguing that it creates a conflict of interest in the Trump case.
Click here to read more from the Washington Examiner.
How did the district attorney’s office respond to the allegations of a romantic relationship?
Rt filing last week, attorneys for the district attorney’s office forcefully dismissed the claims of a romantic relationship between the co-defendants and the prosecutor as baseless and without any supporting evidence. They argued that the allegations were concocted as a desperate attempt to undermine the ongoing investigation into the alleged election subversion by Trump and his associates.
The defense attorneys representing Trump’s co-defendants submitted the allegations in a motion to dismiss the case, claiming that the prosecutor had a personal bias against them due to their alleged romantic relationship. They further alleged that this relationship compromised the integrity and fairness of the investigation, making it impossible for their clients to receive a fair trial.
However, the response from the district attorney’s office was swift and definitive. They categorically denied the existence of any romantic relationship and urged the court to dismiss these unfounded allegations. The district attorney’s office reiterated their commitment to pursuing justice and conducting a thorough investigation, free from any personal biases or inappropriate relationships.
Cellphone Data as Evidence?
One of the main pieces of evidence presented by the defense attorneys was recently discovered cellphone data that allegedly showed extensive communication between the co-defendants and the prosecutor. They claimed that these communications were of a personal nature and indicated a romantic relationship.
However, the district attorney’s office questioned the authenticity and validity of this alleged evidence. They argued that the defense attorneys had not provided any concrete proof that the cellphone data was indeed authentic or had not been manipulated in any way. Furthermore, they emphasized that even if the communications did exist, they would not necessarily prove a romantic relationship, as a professional relationship between a prosecutor and defense attorneys is a common occurrence in legal cases.
The district attorney’s office also highlighted the fact that the defense attorneys had failed to provide any credible witnesses or corroborating evidence to support their claims. They argued that the burden of proof lies with the defense, and without any substantial evidence, these claims should be dismissed as mere speculation and an attempt to divert attention from the serious charges against Trump and his co-defendants.
Implications for the Case
These allegations, if proven to be false, could have serious consequences for the defense. Accusing a prosecutor of personal bias and romantic involvement undermines the credibility of the entire case and can be seen as a desperate move to avoid prosecution. It also has the potential to raise questions about the motivations and intentions of the defense attorneys themselves.
On the other hand, if the claims are proven to be true, it could lead to a significant shake-up in the case. It would raise concerns about the integrity of the investigation and potentially lead to the dismissal of the charges against Trump and his co-defendants. However, given the district attorney’s strong denial and the lack of credible evidence presented by the defense, it seems unlikely that these allegations will hold any weight in the court of law.
In conclusion, the attorneys representing the Fulton County district attorney’s office have vehemently denied the claims of a romantic relationship between the co-defendants and the prosecutor in the Georgia election subversion case. They have dismissed these allegations as baseless and without supporting evidence. The district attorney’s office remains committed to conducting a fair and unbiased investigation, and they urge the court to dismiss these unfounded claims. As the case progresses, the truth behind these allegations will become clearer, and justice will be served accordingly.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...