Chris Christie slams Biden for releasing $6B to Iran for prisoners, says it’s a never-ending cycle.
Chris Christie Slams Biden’s Prisoner Swap with Iran: “You Cannot Give $6 Billion to a Terrorist State”
Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie strongly criticized President Joe Biden for agreeing to a prisoner swap with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which also involves unfreezing $6 billion in Iranian oil revenues.
“I would not have made the deal, Kaitlan, no,” Christie declared during an interview with Kaitlan Collins on CNN’s “The Source” when asked if he would have done the same.
Christie went on to explain, “The idea that Iran would use this money for only humanitarian efforts — let me tell you what humanitarian is in Iran, Kaitlan. That means they cut your hand off before they kill you. That’s humanitarian in Iran.”
He continued, “This is one of the most barbaric regimes in the world, they are the biggest exporter of terror in the world, and Joe Biden has given them now $6 billion to go and make mischief, more mischief, dangerous mischief around the world. I wouldn’t have made this deal. As much as I would have liked those Americans to be home, you cannot give $6 billion to a terrorist state.”
According to Christie, when it comes to securing the release of prisoners, a president can only do their “very best” without worsening the situation.
“Americans are now more of a target for Iran than they were before because they took five this time, maybe they’ll take ten next time, and then they’ll be looking for $12 billion or $15 billion,” Christie warned. “This never ends. It’s a slippery slope that you slide down. As a leader, you have to say no to that type of thing.”
Christie emphasized that the issue lies in the unfreezing of the $6 billion, not the direct prisoner swap. He argued that including the money in the deal only strengthens the regime’s ability to export terror and encourages them to take more Americans hostage in order to obtain additional funds from frozen assets.
Watch the video below:
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
How does Chris Christie’s opposition to the Iran prisoner swap align with the concerns of many Republicans regarding national security?
Red during an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins. “This is a terrible deal, and you cannot give $6 billion to a terrorist state.”
Christie’s remarks come in response to the recent prisoner swap between the United States and Iran, in which four Americans detained in Iran were released in exchange for seven Iranians incarcerated in America. The deal, brokered by Sweden, also includes the unfreezing of $6 billion in Iranian oil revenues that were previously withheld due to international sanctions.
Former Governor Christie, known for his strong stance on national security, expressed vehement opposition to the agreement, citing concerns over funding a state deemed by the United States as a sponsor of terrorism. His perspective aligns with the sentiment shared by many Republicans who argue that the Biden administration is compromising national security by appeasing a hostile regime.
The issue of prisoner swaps has always been a contentious one, walking the fine line between humanitarianism and national security interests. On one hand, it is universally acknowledged that the release of American citizens held captive is a significant achievement. It is a moment of great relief for the families involved, and the nation as a whole rejoices in the return of its countrymen.
However, the complexity arises when confronting the question of what a nation may be willing to sacrifice in order to secure such releases. The concern regarding the potential consequences of funding a state involved in terrorism is a valid one, as injecting billions into Iran’s coffers could potentially worsen instability in the Middle East and indirectly support nefarious activities.
While some argue that the release of American detainees should take precedence over geopolitical considerations, critics of the Biden administration argue that a tougher stance on Iran could achieve both objectives simultaneously. By maintaining a stringent position against regimes that support terrorism, they assert, the United States can ensure the safety of its citizens without empowering rogue governments.
Proponents of the prisoner swap emphasize the humanitarian aspect of the agreement. They argue that securing the release of Americans wrongly imprisoned is a moral duty that should not be overshadowed by political considerations. Furthermore, they assert that opening lines of communication with Iran and engaging in diplomacy will lead to improved relations, which will ultimately serve the United States’ long-term interests.
As the debate over the Iran prisoner swap intensifies, it highlights the complexities of navigating international relations. The Biden administration faces the difficult task of balancing humanitarian concerns with national security interests, all while attempting to forge a new, more stable relationship with Iran. Critics like Christie question whether this particular approach will achieve the desired results.
Ultimately, the long-term ramifications of the prisoner swap remain uncertain. It is essential to consider the potential repercussions of funding a state with a questionable track record in terms of promoting peace and stability. The Biden administration should be cautious in its endeavors, ensuring that the pursuit of humanitarian objectives does not inadvertently empower hostile regimes.
As the 2022 midterms approach and the 2024 election looms on the horizon, the stance of politicians like Chris Christie towards the Iran prisoner swap could shape the discourse on foreign policy within the Republican Party. It remains to be seen how these events will impact public opinion and the trajectory of diplomatic efforts with Iran, making it an issue of utmost importance for policymakers and citizens alike.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...