Texas in the midst of a Civil War as historians promote leftism over history
A fierce battle is raging in Texas between academic historians and history enthusiasts, with the enthusiasts advocating for a focus on primary source material and the “experts” pushing their own far-left political agenda. The conflict reached a boiling point when a prominent publisher of Texas history books discovered that the gift shops at historical sites were selling books unrelated to Texas history or slavery. Instead, they were filled with modern leftist political screeds and books about black victimhood. This discovery prompted the publisher to write to the Texas Historical Commission, questioning why these books were being sold at state historic sites. The situation was further exacerbated when an article in Texas Monthly twisted the story, falsely claiming that the publisher wanted books about slavery banned. The article sparked outrage and led to threats against the publisher. However, the truth is that the publisher simply wanted more relevant books about Texas slavery to be available. The smear campaign against the publisher seems to be a result of a larger battle between citizen historians and academics who use history to promote their own political agenda. The Texas State Historical Association, which is supposed to represent both academic historians and laypeople, has been dominated by academics in recent years. These academics have used the association to push their own racial conspiracy theories and have stifled differing points of view. The battle came to a head when a businessman stepped in to save the association and suggested appointing a layman to the board, which caused outrage among the academics. The association eventually settled a lawsuit and several academics resigned. Since then, the academics have been struggling to deal with opposing views. The publisher believes that history should be accessible to all Americans and that primary source documents hold more value than contemporary ideologues. She has digitized thousands of pages of primary source material to make it freely available to the public. Despite facing backlash from activist historians, she remains committed to providing people with direct access to historical sources.
How did the distortions surrounding the publisher’s request to address the inclusion of unrelated books provoke a larger battle between citizen historians and academic historians?
Title: The Battle Between Academic Historians and History Enthusiasts: Preserving History or Promoting Agenda?
Introduction
A fierce battle has erupted in Texas between academic historians and history enthusiasts, revealing a struggle over the direction of historical narratives. While enthusiasts advocate for a focus on primary source material, there are concerns that academic historians may be pushing their own far-left political agenda. This conflict intensified when a prominent publisher of Texas history books discovered unrelated, modern leftist political screeds and books about black victimhood being sold at state historic sites. The publisher’s attempt to address the issue was distorted by Texas Monthly, leading to a smear campaign with threats against the publisher. Amidst this controversy, the battle highlights a clash between citizen historians and academics, and raises questions about the role of accessibility and diverse perspectives within historical associations.
The Discovery and the Distortions
The discovery that gift shops at historical sites were selling books unrelated to Texas history prompts the publisher to write to the Texas Historical Commission, questioning the inclusion of such books. However, an article in Texas Monthly falsely claimed that the publisher wanted books about slavery banned, sparking outrage and threats against the publisher. In reality, the publisher simply wanted more relevant books about Texas slavery to be available, which was a reasonable concern given the historical context of the sites. This distortion and resulting smear campaign reflect a larger battle between citizen historians and academic historians who may be using history to advance their political agendas.
The Dominance of Academics
The Texas State Historical Association, seemingly representing both academic historians and laypeople, has been dominated by academics in recent years. These academics have utilized the association to promote their own racial conspiracy theories while stifling differing points of view. This monopolization of power and suppression of alternative perspectives demonstrate a concerning trend within the association. The association’s credibility suffered a major blow when a lawsuit was settled, revealing a lack of ethical conduct among some academics. Several academics were urged to resign, and the association has since struggled to accommodate dissenting perspectives.
The Publisher’s Commitment to Accessibility
Amidst this battle, the publisher firmly believes that history should be accessible to all Americans. Recognizing the value of primary source documents, she has digitized thousands of pages to make them freely available to the public. Despite facing backlash from activist historians who may disagree with her viewpoint, the publisher remains steadfast in her commitment to providing people with direct access to historical sources. Through this approach, she seeks to empower individuals to engage with history firsthand rather than relying solely on interpretations influenced by contemporary ideology.
Conclusion
The ongoing struggle between academic historians and history enthusiasts in Texas highlights the clash of interests and perspectives within historical narratives. The discovery of irrelevant books being sold at state historic sites and subsequent misrepresentation of the publisher’s intentions further fuel this battle. The dominance of academics in historical associations has stifled dissenting voices and limited the representation of laypeople. However, committed individuals like the publisher continue to advocate for accessibility to primary source material, emphasizing its significance in understanding the past. Ultimately, it is crucial to recognize the importance of diverse perspectives and the avoidance of political agendas in preserving and interpreting history for future generations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...