Report: Clarence Thomas accused of granting elite group Supreme Court access.

Justice Clarence Thomas’s Involvement in Exclusive Club Raises Ethical Concerns

Justice Clarence Thomas’s connections to a wealthy and exclusive club have come under scrutiny, adding to the ongoing debate surrounding potential ethical concerns involving Supreme Court justices.

Months after a highly contentious confirmation process, Thomas joined the prestigious Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, named after the renowned Gilded Age author.

The New York Times reported that Thomas and his wife, Virginia Thomas, allegedly enjoyed various perks through their club membership, including vacation retreats, V.I.P. access to sporting events, and extravagant gatherings. David Sokol, a member of the club and once considered the heir apparent to Warren Buffett, even described the Thomases as “close personal friends” and has hosted them at his Montana ranch and waterfront mansion in Florida.

Furthermore, Thomas is said to have received benefits from other Horatio Alger members, some of whom are major donors to conservative causes with a vested interest in Supreme Court decisions, even if not directly involved in the cases.

Controversy Surrounding Justice Thomas’s Relationships with Wealthy Elites

Justice Thomas’s associations with affluent individuals have attracted significant attention recently, fueling speculation that he may have violated ethical standards. Despite pushback from Thomas and Republicans, who claim this is an attempt to tarnish conservative justices, concerns persist.

ProPublica previously reported undisclosed trips taken by Thomas with billionaire GOP donor Harlan Crow, as well as an expensive fishing lodge excursion by fellow Justice Samuel Alito with a different friend, Paul Singer, in 2008. The outlet also revealed undisclosed real estate transactions between the Thomases and Crow, who even paid tuition for one of Thomas’s relatives.

While both justices have defended their friendships and trips, Democrats have criticized the apparent conflicts of interest.

Supreme Court Decisions and Democratic Criticism

The Supreme Court’s recent decisions, including the dismantling of race-based affirmative action college admissions programs, the blocking of President Biden’s student loan debt forgiveness proposal, and siding with an anti-gay Colorado wedding website designer, have faced criticism from Democrats.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) expressed his concerns, stating, “After a multi-decade, special interest-funded effort to reshape the federal judiciary, the fanatical MAGA Right have captured the Supreme Court and achieved dangerous, regressive policies that they could never attain at the ballot box. This MAGA-captured Supreme Court feels free to accept lavish gifts and vacations from their powerful, big-monied friends, all while they refuse to help everyday Americans.”

The ongoing debate surrounding Justice Thomas’s involvement with the exclusive club and his relationships with wealthy elites continues to raise questions about the integrity and impartiality of the Supreme Court.

Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases