CNN shares how the network went to great lengths to report on Trump news that was already known.

Breaking News: CNN’s Elaborate Operation to Break News About Trump’s Arraignment

Boy, CNN sure showed everybody.

Sure, there was a ban on electronic devices inside the Miami courtroom where former President Donald Trump was arraigned on Tuesday in Florida. But the folks at CNN would stop at nothing to get you the news as quickly as possible.

So they hired a bunch of high schoolers who then found apparently the last operating pay phones in America to relay the astonishing news:

Trump was pleading not guilty.

On Wednesday, CNN’s Oliver Darcy gave his network a massive pat on the back for a strange, elaborate operation to get around a courtroom ban on electronic devices at the former president’s arraignment on 37 counts related to claims he mishandled classified government documents in a Miami federal court.

This, Darcy said, allowed the network to relay to America breaking news that America, to the extent it was paying attention, already guessed would happen weeks ago.

But you couldn’t tell that from the senior media reporter’s prose, which made the whole thing sound like something Steve McQueen might have starred in were it dramatized a half-century ago.

How was CNN able to break the news on Trump pleading not guilty, despite devices ban?

By hiring a group of Miami high school students who ran info out of the courtroom and dictated it via pay phone.

Great behind-the-scenes look by ⁦@oliverdarcy⁩: https://t.co/iSqbK8uqOf

— Gabe Fleisher (@WakeUp2Politics) June 14, 2023

However, like all Steve McQueen movies, there had to be a hitch. In this case, it was that the pay phones outside the courthouse could only make local calls, because this is apparently 1992 or something.

“To overcome the final obstacle, CNN’s staff devised a plan to have the production assistant dial his own personal cell phone, which was located in a nearby RV that the network was using as a mobile headquarters,” Darcy wrote.

“Brad Parks, a CNN regional newsgathering director stationed inside the RV, then picked up the phone, typed up the reporting and relayed the information to the outlet’s Washington, D.C. bureau,” he said. “Once the reporting was cleared for air by senior leaders in Washington, it was then transmitted to the control room and the network at large. And, from there, it was finally communicated to CNN’s anchors, who delivered the news to viewers across the world.”

A world that, for the most part, could not have been less transfixed on the news Trump was doing exactly what everyone knew he was going to do:

I knew he was going to plead “not guilty” 17 weeks ago.

— AlternativeFacts (@rsammysams) June 14, 2023

In what universe is Trump pleading not guilty to this – or any – indictment breaking news?

— Dex in Boston (@DexInBoston) June 14, 2023

And their half a dozen viewers were ecstatic.

— Doug (@Doug__J) June 14, 2023

I kept hearing CNN boasting about their “exclusive” reports and I was puzzled. Good to see what they meant I guess. But of course, Trump would plead not guilty…not convinced this is the gleeful scoop they pretend it is.

— Sally Smith (@bizwhizyay) June 14, 2023

Trump pleading not guilty isn’t breaking news.

— senschuh (@senschuh) June 14, 2023

It’s ironic, then, that presented with the only real news of the day — namely, Trump’s post-arraignment remarks at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster in New Jersey — the network declined to air it.

“We’re not carrying his remarks live because, frankly, he says a lot of things that are not true and sometimes potentially dangerous,” CNN host Jake Tapper said as the president took the stage.

Jake Tapper on CNN not covering Donald Trump’s speech: “We’re not carrying his remarks live because frankly he says a lot of things that are not true and sometimes potentially dangerous.”

pic.twitter.com/WsycPg5WDH

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) June 14, 2023

Now, to be fair, there’s kind of a point to be made here — although it’s not the point CNN was making.

Darcy noted that the CNN team had to jump through hoops “because of the archaic system in which U.S. federal courts operate. The public continues to have remarkably little access to proceedings in federal courts — no matter how consequential or extraordinary the case may be.”

Perhaps the Trump case will change that — when proceedings that actually make news start happening inside said courtroom.

However, that’s not really what Darcy or the network was trying to get across with this bit of meta-coverage.

CNN apparently will congratulate itself fulsomely on pulling off a labyrinthine end-run around a ban on electronic devices inside the courtroom where Trump was being arraigned that involved high schoolers, pay phones, notepad paper and a producer relaying information from an RV — all to tell us what we knew before Trump walked into the courtroom on Tuesday.

But afterward, given an effort-free opportunity to report on the only non-predictable news of the day — just aim camera at Bad Orange Man, let him talk, then throw it to the usual lineup of pundits who’ll denounce him like they were going to anyway — the network declined because allowing CNN viewers to hear Trump unfiltered would be “dangerous.”

“[D]espite the obstacles the federal court system has in place, newsrooms will find a way to climb over them and deliver the news — as was evidenced Tuesday,” Darcy wrote in conclusion.

He should have added some newsrooms will go to similar lengths to keep the news from their viewers, should they find it inconvenient.

The post CNN Shares the Great Lengths Network Went to Break News About Trump That Everyone Already Knew appeared first on The Western Journal.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases