College withdraws plan to charge conservatives ‘security’ fee for hosting Michael Knowles

The University of Wisconsin-Madison Backs Down from⁤ Charging Conservative Group for Security Fee

The ​University of Wisconsin-Madison has reversed its decision to charge a conservative group a special “security” ‍fee for bringing Daily Wire host Michael Knowles to campus. This​ move has been seen as rewarding lawless protesters and giving them a heckler’s veto, as conservatives were being made​ to ⁣pay for police to prevent leftists from committing ‌crimes.

Prior to Knowles’ speech on campus, college ⁢administrators informed Young Americans for Freedom that​ they would have ⁢to pay $4,271.17 for six⁢ police officers, a metal detector, and other security-related ⁣costs. The university even attempted to charge “sales tax,” despite it being seemingly ⁢inapplicable. However, on Monday ‍afternoon,‌ the university reversed⁣ its decision after facing accusations that its actions were “unlawful.”

The University of Wisconsin-Madison has never billed student groups for security when hosting speakers in the past. ‌The Wisconsin Institute for Law ​& Liberty (WILL) and the Mountain States Legal Foundation wrote a letter stating that these costs are “unlawful.”

The decision to charge the conservative group⁢ was supposedly⁣ based‌ on a “risk assessment worksheet” that claimed there‍ were significant security and safety problems at ⁢previous events sponsored‌ by the group. This may be ⁣in reference to the‌ large-scale vandalism committed ⁢by leftists during a ​previous event featuring Matt​ Walsh, another Daily Wire host. Despite having video​ evidence of the vandalism, the university chose not⁤ to prosecute or punish the perpetrators.

Another factor could‌ be the incidents that occurred during⁢ a speech by Knowles at the University of‍ Pittsburgh, where pro-transgenderism protesters allegedly committed crimes, including using an explosive device.‍ Two individuals were⁣ later charged with conspiracy and obstruction of law enforcement. The university’s decision​ to charge the⁣ conservative‌ group while not punishing these left-wing wrongdoers has been criticized for encouraging more left-wing crimes.

On Monday afternoon, the University of Wisconsin-Madison backed down from its demand without admitting any mistake or promising reforms. Nancy Lynch, the university’s vice chancellor for legal affairs, stated that‍ the charges related to extensive security protocols would be removed from the revised contract to ensure⁣ that the speaker⁢ event could proceed as planned.

It is‍ worth noting that the⁢ university did not bill Young Americans for Freedom for security during previous⁣ events featuring Matt Walsh and⁢ Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro. There is also no indication that ⁢left-wing speakers, including ‍controversial figures ‍like Bradley Manning⁢ and Senator Elizabeth Warren, have been charged for security.

The letter from Young Americans for Freedom’s lawyers⁣ argues that the university’s decision to charge for security‌ is based on the content of Knowles’ speech and the public reaction to it. Such a policy would be invalid if it ⁣ties the fee amount to the speech’s content. The letter also⁣ warns ⁤that ​individuals involved in these ⁣constitutional violations may be personally liable.

The ‍University of California, Berkeley⁤ faced a similar situation when it attempted to charge Young Americans for ‌Freedom for security to restrain⁣ leftist lawbreakers. Ultimately, Berkeley settled with the group, paying $70,000⁣ in attorney fees and agreeing to revise campus policies for hosting speakers.

Ironically, Michael Knowles, the Daily Wire host at the center of this controversy, authored a book on‌ censorship⁤ titled “Speechless.” His speech at the University of Wisconsin-Madison is a pro-life address called “The ​Case Against Murder.”

According to Dan Lennington, WILL​ Deputy Counsel, “Freedom‌ of speech is not negotiable.” He‌ argues that charging a conservative ⁢group⁢ thousands of ⁣dollars for a so-called “controversial” speaker is ridiculous, especially when ⁢the university routinely hosts and pays controversial left-wing speakers. Lennington believes ‌that the university should ⁣support multiple viewpoints and encourage⁤ a robust exchange of ideas.

The University of Wisconsin-Madison is a public institution⁤ that values freedom of expression‌ as an essential part of its educational mission.‌ However, ​its recent actions have raised concerns about its commitment to this value.

Meanwhile, Brian DiPippa, the individual charged with using an explosive device at Knowles’ speech at the University of Pittsburgh, remains in jail awaiting trial.⁤ Despite a letter from a “DEI⁣ coach and​ consultant” advocating for​ his release, DiPippa’s incarceration continues.

How does charging security fees to conservative groups at the ‌University of Wisconsin-Madison impact their freedom of ⁢speech?

Ing, have ever⁢ been charged for security‍ fees at the university.

This decision by the University of Wisconsin-Madison ⁢has raised questions about the treatment ⁢of conservative voices on college campuses and the stifling of free speech. Many argue that by charging a security fee to conservatives, the university is essentially penalizing them for their‌ beliefs​ and allowing ⁤protesters to dictate who can and cannot speak on campus.

This incident is not ⁣unique to the University of Wisconsin-Madison, as⁣ similar situations have occurred at ‍other universities across the⁢ country. Conservative ⁢speakers have often faced protests, disruptions, and even violence during their events, ⁣while ⁢little to no action is‍ taken against those responsible for these actions.

The issue of ​free speech on college‌ campuses is a contentious ‍one, with supporters of free speech arguing ​that all voices, regardless of political ideology, ⁣should ⁣be allowed to be ⁣heard.⁤ However, opponents argue that hate‌ speech and controversial viewpoints should not be given a platform, as they can create a hostile⁤ and ⁤unsafe environment for marginalized ⁣groups.

While it ⁢is important to maintain a safe and inclusive environment on college⁢ campuses, ⁢it is ⁣equally crucial ​to uphold the principles of free ​speech and allow‍ for‌ a diversity ​of viewpoints. Charging ⁢security fees⁣ to conservative groups, while ⁣not doing the⁤ same for other groups, sends a message that certain beliefs or perspectives are not welcome.

The University of Wisconsin-Madison’s decision to reverse the security fee for the conservative group is a step⁤ in the right direction, but more can and should ⁢be done to ensure that ⁣all voices are heard ‌and respected on ‍college campuses. Universities should strive to create an atmosphere where respectful and constructive dialogue can take place, and where diverse perspectives are celebrated rather than silenced.

In conclusion, ⁢the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s reversal​ of its decision ‌to charge a conservative ‌group ‍for a security fee is a positive development. It‍ highlights the importance of free speech ⁣and the need to treat all voices equally on college campuses. However, this incident also raises broader questions about the state of⁢ free‍ speech‌ on college campuses and the challenges ⁢faced by conservative voices. It is a reminder that⁢ universities have ​a responsibility to‌ foster an⁤ environment that values‍ and encourages diverse perspectives, while also ensuring the safety and well-being of all students.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases