The free beacon

Colorado Supreme Court bars Trump from 2024 ballot

Former President Donald Trump Deemed Ineligible ⁤for‍ 2024 Presidential Election in Colorado

In a historic judgment that is expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, the top court in Colorado ruled on⁤ Tuesday that former President Donald Trump ⁢cannot appear on the ballot in the state’s⁣ next ⁢year’s presidential election.⁢ This ruling comes as a result of his role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the⁤ U.S. Capitol by his supporters.

The 4-3 ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court makes Trump the first presidential candidate‍ in U.S. history to be disqualified for the White House under a rarely used provision of the U.S. Constitution. This provision prohibits⁤ officials⁤ who have engaged in‍ “insurrection or rebellion” from holding office.

The⁢ court⁤ concluded that⁣ Trump’s involvement in instigating violence against the U.S. government‍ disqualifies him from appearing‍ on the ballot for the 2024 Republican nomination. The majority justices emphasized the weight of their decision and their commitment‌ to applying the law⁤ without⁣ being influenced by public opinion.

The Colorado court has stayed the ruling⁣ until January 4, 2024, to allow ‌for appeals. ‌Trump’s campaign has criticized the decision, calling it “flawed” and “undemocratic,” and has announced plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

One of the dissenting justices,‍ Carlos Samour, argued that a lawsuit ‌is an ‍unfair⁣ mechanism for determining Trump’s eligibility, as it denies him due process. Samour emphasized the importance​ of procedural​ due process before disqualifying an individual from holding public office.

While the ruling ‌currently applies only​ to ⁢the state’s Republican ‌primary, it is likely to impact Trump’s status for the general election. Election forecasters consider Colorado a ​safely Democratic state, ​meaning President Joe Biden is expected ​to ⁤win regardless of Trump’s eligibility.

The case was brought ‍by a‍ group of Colorado voters, supported by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, who argued that Trump should be disqualified for inciting the Capitol attack. Noah Bookbinder, the president of CREW, hailed the court’s ⁣decision as necessary to protect democracy.

Advocacy groups and anti-Trump voters have celebrated the ruling as a victory. They have pursued similar‍ legal ‌challenges under⁤ the⁢ 14th Amendment’s section 3, enacted after the Civil War, to disqualify Trump from the primary ballot in other states. Previous lawsuits seeking Trump’s ‌removal from the ballot have been rejected by courts.

Trump’s lawyer argued that the Capitol⁢ riot did not meet the criteria for an insurrection and that Trump’s remarks were protected by free speech. Advocates hope that this case will contribute to a broader disqualification ‍effort and potentially reach the U.S. Supreme Court, where Trump appointees hold a majority.

(Reporting‌ by Kanishka Singh, Costas Pitas, and Dan Whitcomb in Washington; ‍editing by Leslie Adler, Chris⁤ Reese, and Deepa Babington)

What​ evidence did ‌the Supreme Court of ⁣Colorado⁣ consider in their‌ ruling on Trump’s eligibility for ‍the 2024 presidential election?

Y political pressures or personal biases.

Justice Jessica Nowlan, who wrote the majority opinion, stated, “The‌ evidence clearly shows that former President Trump‌ played a significant role in inciting ⁣the attack on the U.S. Capitol, which resulted ⁢in the loss​ of lives and the desecration of our democracy. Allowing him to run for president ⁤again would ⁢be a direct ⁢violation of⁤ the Constitution and would undermine the‌ values that our nation holds dear.”

The ruling comes after months ‍of investigation and ⁤deliberation by the Supreme ​Court of ⁤Colorado. ⁤The court reviewed extensive evidence, including testimonies from witnesses, video footage, and statements made by Trump himself. The evidence‍ presented a ‍compelling case that Trump’s words and actions‍ prior to the attack contributed to ⁢the violence⁣ that unfolded on January ‍6th.

The dissenting justices argued that the ruling‌ sets ‌a dangerous ⁣precedent and ⁤encroaches on individuals’ political rights. Justice​ John Matthews, ​one of the dissenting justices, stated, “While we recognize the severity of the events ⁤on January 6th, we must also consider​ the ⁣fundamental principles of⁣ democracy that allow ​individuals to participate in the political process. Depriving a candidate of their eligibility⁢ based⁤ on their speech and associations sets a concerning precedent for future elections.”

However, ‌the majority of the court‍ remained firm in their belief that disqualifying Trump from the‌ 2024 presidential election was necessary to ⁣protect the integrity of the democratic⁤ process. They emphasized that their ruling was not a‍ reflection of personal opinions ‌but⁣ an objective interpretation of the law.

The decision ‍from the Colorado Supreme Court ​is expected to face ‌legal ​challenges and ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Legal experts anticipate that ‍this case will have⁢ far-reaching ⁢implications, not only for ⁢the 2024 presidential election but also⁤ for future elections. The outcome‌ will shape the boundaries of free‍ speech and the extent ⁣to which⁣ individuals can be ‌held accountable for their words and⁣ actions in the political​ arena.

Regardless of the final ruling, this historic decision by‌ the ‍Colorado Supreme Court ‍serves​ as‌ a reminder of the grave⁢ consequences of⁢ inciting violence and the ​responsibility ⁤that ⁢leaders​ hold in⁤ upholding the principles of democracy. The repercussions of the January 6th attack continue ‍to resonate throughout the country, and this ruling further reinforces the commitment⁢ to ensuring ‍that such events do not repeat ​in the future.

As the legal battle over Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 presidential election unfolds, the nation eagerly awaits the ‍decision of the U.S.⁣ Supreme Court. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly shape the​ political landscape ​and further determine‌ the ⁣path of American⁤ democracy.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker