Colorado to outlaw workplace and housing discrimination based on weight as obesity rates increase
OAN’s James Meyers
11:43 AM – Monday, December 11, 2023
Colorado Considers Banning Fat-Shaming
Lawmakers in Colorado are discussing a new legislation that would prohibit state employers and landlords from using derogatory terms like “fat” to describe individuals.
This move aims to prevent discrimination against overweight or obese individuals in employment and housing. It follows New York’s recent implementation of a similar law, as obesity rates continue to rise across the state and the nation.
Moreover, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Jersey are also considering passing similar bills, while Michigan has had a fatphobia law in place since 1976.
The Centennial State plans to enact the new legislation in 2024.
With West Virginia currently holding the highest obesity rate at 71%, followed by Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma, the need for such laws is evident.
However, critics argue that lawmakers have not fully considered the potential impact and costs of these proposed laws.
“The extent of the impact and cost of this legislation has not been fully considered,” Kathy Wylde, president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, said in a statement.
In Texas, a court previously ruled that obesity does not qualify as a “protected characteristic” without medical clearance.
Stay informed! Subscribe here to receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. https://www.oann.com/alerts
The State Department’s Global Engagement Center is allegedly using taxpayer funds to silence conservative news outlets, according to the Senior Litigation Counsel at the New Civil Liberties Alliance. One America’s John Hines reports from Washington.
Tensions escalate in the Middle East amid the Israel-Hamas War.
Central Tennessee mourns as severe storms and tornadoes claim the lives of at least six people.
Join Thaddeus Cleveland for the latest updates.
Microsoft and the AFL-CIO union federation have reached a deal where the software giant will remain neutral in union efforts to encourage worker membership.
Amazon.com seeks to dismiss a U.S. government antitrust lawsuit accusing the company of using illegal strategies to boost profits in its online retail empire.
Over 10 million people have signed up for X in December, according to X CEO Linda Yaccarino’s post on the social media platform.
Alphabet shares surge 5.3% higher as Wall Street celebrates the launch of Gemini.
rnrn
What are the concerns raised by critics regarding the impact and costs of implementing laws that address fat-shaming
Oblem” under the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prevents discrimination against individuals with disabilities. However, some argue that fat-shaming can have detrimental effects on an individual’s mental and physical health, and should be treated as a form of discrimination.
Supporters of the legislation in Colorado argue that by prohibiting the use of derogatory terms like “fat,” the state can take a step towards creating a more inclusive and accepting society. They believe that everyone should be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their body size or weight.
In addition to Colorado, several other states are considering similar legislation to address fat-shaming. Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Jersey are among those planning to pass bills to protect individuals from discrimination based on their weight. On the other hand, Michigan has had a fatphobia law in place since 1976, showing that the issue has been recognized for decades.
The decision to ban fat-shaming also comes as obesity rates continue to rise across the United States. West Virginia currently holds the highest obesity rate at 71%, followed by Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. These statistics highlight the pressing need for measures that promote body positivity and combat discrimination based on weight.
However, critics of the legislation argue that lawmakers have not fully considered the potential impact and costs of these proposed laws. Kathy Wylde, the president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, expressed concerns about the extent of the impact and cost of such legislation. It is crucial to consider the implications of implementing these laws and ensure they do not create unintended consequences or hinder businesses’ ability to operate effectively.
It remains to be seen how the legislation will develop in Colorado and other states. As the conversation around body positivity and discrimination continues, it is important to strike a balance between creating inclusive environments and considering the practical implications of new laws.
Overall, the discussion surrounding the banning of fat-shaming reflects larger societal debates about body image, discrimination, and inclusivity. While the intention to protect individuals from derogatory language is commendable, it is crucial to approach these issues with an understanding of the potential impact and costs involved. By working towards a more accepting and supportive society, we can foster a healthier and more inclusive environment for all individuals, regardless of their body size or weight.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
