Colorado’s Highest Court May Decide If Elephants Are Persons Under the Law

In ‍Colorado Springs, ‍an animal rights group, the NonHuman​ Rights Project, is advocating for⁣ the release of five ​African elephants‍ from the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo. The group​ argues that the elephants,⁤ who have lived within the ‌confines of ​the zoo for decades, are⁢ suffering from unlawful confinement and should be allowed to live in a sanctuary. The Colorado‌ Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding whether these elephants can ‍be considered legal persons under the law, enabling them to challenge⁤ their captivity through a habeas corpus petition, a legal process typically used by prisoners.

In support of their case, the‌ group claims the elephants are enduring immense and unnecessary suffering, while a lawyer⁤ representing ⁣them emphasized the ⁢need for judicial​ intervention. This legal battle follows a similar, unsuccessful case in New York involving an elephant named Happy, where the court⁢ ruled that elephants do not qualify as persons under the ‍law, which would impact societal⁣ views on animal rights.

The Cheyenne Mountain Zoo contends that relocating the elephants would be cruel due to ‍their age and lack of social skills for larger herds, arguing that the animal rights group is‍ seeking a broader precedent that could challenge the captivity⁣ of any animal. The zoo expressed concern that this case⁢ could lead to unintended ⁤consequences affecting pet ownership laws.


DENVER (AP) — Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou, and Jambo have lived in Colorado Springs for decades in the elephant exhibit at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo. Now an animal rights group is trying to release the elephants from what they say is essentially a prison for such highly intelligent and social animals known to roam for miles a day in the wild.

Colorado’s highest court will hear arguments Thursday on whether the older African female elephants should be legally able to challenge their captivity under a long-held process used by prisoners to dispute their detention. The animal rights group NonHuman Rights Project says the animals are languishing while “unlawfully confined” at the zoo, and wants them released to an unspecified elephant sanctuary.

“They are suffering immensely and unnecessarily. Without judicial intervention, they are doomed to suffer day after day, year after year, for the rest of their lives,” a lawyer for the group, Jake Davis, said in a May brief submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court.

The main legal issue is whether or not the elephants are considered persons under the law, and therefore able to pursue a petition of habeas corpus challenging their detention. The NonHuman Rights project argues that legal personhood is not limited to humans.

The lawsuit is similar to an unsuccessful one the group filed challenging the confinement of an elephant named Happy at the Bronx Zoo in 2022. New York’s Court of Appeals ruled that Happy, while intelligent and deserving of compassion, cannot be considered a person illegally confined with the ability to pursue a petition seeking release.

The New York ruling said giving such rights to an elephant “would have an enormous destabilizing impact on modern society” and change how humans interact with animals.

The Cheyenne Mountain Zoo says moving the elephants and potentially placing them with new animals would be cruel at their age, potentially causing them unnecessary stress. It says they are not used to being in larger herds and, based on its experience, they do not have the skills or desire to join them.

In a statement ahead of Thursday’s hearing, the zoo claimed the NonHuman Rights Project isn’t concerned about the elephants but is just trying to create a judicial precedent that would allow the captivity of any animal to challenged.

“We hope Colorado isn’t the place that sets the slippery slope in motion of whether your beloved and well-cared-for dog or cat should have habeas corpus and would be required to ‘go free,’ at the whim of someone else’s opinion of them,” it said.

The Western Journal has not reviewed this Associated Press story prior to publication. Therefore, it may contain editorial bias or may in some other way not meet our normal editorial standards. It is provided to our readers as a service from The Western Journal.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker