‘Colossal Failure’: Did This Just Become the Worst Public Health Disaster in History?

👉 Sponsor OFFER
Enjoy luxurious enzyme coffee at 15% discount with code Health15 DayesCoffee.com

———–

Dr. Restef Levi is a professor of risk assessment at the MIT Sloan School of Management and has issued a statement calling for an immediate halt to COVID-19 vaccine programs.

We asked Levi for details about the evidence that led to his position.

Recent research has shown that the current mRNA vaccine COVID-19 is causing serious harm to people and resulting in deaths at higher rates than previously thought.

This is causing another unintended crisis.

Dan and Dr. Levi will discuss the implications of mandating experimental vaccination.

———–

FULL TRANSCRIPT

DR. RETSEF LEVI

One of the most striking facts about this case is its utter failure. This is the largest failure of any medical product in terms of safety and efficacy.

This is likely to be remembered as one of the worst public health disasters, if it doesn’t already.

DAN SKORBACH

Professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, Dr. Retsef is Dr. Levi. His specialty is in risk management for healthcare systems. He analyzes medical data to determine if there are any risks to your health.

Dr. Levi served as an advisor to the U.S. government on the best course. However, once the mRNA vaccinations were available, Levi turned his attention to Israel.

This government was the first to completely vaccinate its citizens against Covid.

Based on clinical trials by Moderna and Pfizer, it was known that these vaccines can cause myocarditis. The data proved that there was a very low risk. The data showed that the risk was low, and the health officials expected it to stay that way after the shots were released in the real world.

Dr. Levi found something more. They analyzed, together with their colleagues, the 2021 period when the vaccines were introduced in Israel. They started to notice a 25 percent increase in cardiac arrests and heart attacks. These weren’t just for anyone. These were young Israelis. The age range of 18-39 years old.

So these scientists published They published their findings in Nature Scientific Reports (April 28, 2022).

They concluded that the COVID-19 vaccine program was responsible for the 25 percent increase of cardiovascular events. The team did not have sufficient data at the time to link the cardiac events to the mRNA vaccinations. They were clear that this was a correlation. Their intent was to tell you that this is a safety signal. This should be investigated immediately.

The climate is changing today, however, as more peer-reviewed, credible evidence is published in respected journals. Dr. Levi is now confident in his ability to tell these experts that they need to stop the production of vaccines. His new position was viral. twitter:

DR. RETSEF LEVI, via TWITTER

Because of mounting evidence that they cause unimaginable harm, including death of children and young people, they should be stopped.

DAN SKORBACH

We reached out to Dr. Levi for more information. These are coming from diverse scientific groups around the globe.

This studyLast August, for instance, the sparked a lot of attention. The U.S. clinical scientist led this research team. Joseph Fraiman. They reanalyzed data from Moderna and Pfizer’s clinical trials.

The first step in getting vaccines on market is a clinical trial. The FDA reviews the trial results in order to decide if it is worth allowing these products to be sold. We all know the outcome. These products received an emergency use permit. The FDA reviewed Moderna’s clinical trials and determined that mRNA vaccination has more benefits than COVID-19.

Dr. Fraiman’s research team did not find this. They were also very thorough in analyzing these data.

The clinical data showed that serious adverse events were more likely to occur after vaccination than the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations. It’s comparable to the placebo groups in Moderna and Pfizer trials. These are the numbers.

In Pfizer, excess risk of serious adverse events* after vaccination was 10.1 per 10,000, but reduction in risk for a COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group was 2.3 per 10,000 people.

The vaccine caused more serious injuries than the number who were actually protected from hospitalization. Moderna experienced the same effect.

There was an excess risk of serious adverse reactions at 15.1 per 10,000. But, there was a reduction in hospitalization at 6.4 per 10,000.

DR. RETSEF LEVI

It’s statistically significant and causes more harm than one vaccine per 800. This brings us to the question: what is the correct metric for assessing the effectiveness of a vaccine such as this? Its ability to prevent death or severe illness from Covid was what we were led by.

However, the most important thing is the overall impact of the vaccines on the health of the people who are being vaccinated. When you look at the overall impact on health, as shown by the clinical trials, which are the highest quality evidence, it is clear that you will see more harm than benefit if these vaccines are rolled out to the wider population.

Now, fast forward. If we examine data at the population level for 2021 and 2022, we find that most developed countries have high levels of mortality. This includes the U.S. and UK, Europe, Israel. It is rising from 2020 to 2021. This is a rare event.

Excess mortality is something that people need to be able to define. Extra mortality refers to the difference between the actual number of deaths and what you would expect. This data is often volatile, and you will see that it can fluctuate between ups or downs. If you have a poor year, then you will see that the pool of people most likely to die has decreased.

In the next year, there will be no excess mortality. However, we are seeing three years of excessive mortality. It is increasing. It’s not only a matter of expediting, but also an increase in excess mortality. Now you need to ask yourself: What is the cause?

If you examine the pattern of growth, it is quite temporarily related to the vaccine campaigns. That should at most make you very nervous.

DAN SKORBACH

Let’s now look at the evidence. We know that around 1 in 800 people could suffer serious harm from the use of mRNA vaccines. Dr. Fraiman’s research team has helped us to understand this. The number of people who suffer serious harm is greater than the number of hospitalizations prevented. These facts challenge the notion that these vaccines work.

Dr. Levi’s research revealed that more young Israelis are suffering from cardiovascular disease after receiving a vaccine. He also noticed similar patterns in Australia, Germany, Scotland and Germany.

DR. RETSEF LEVI

There are two pivotal studies right now. These studies are: Thailand And one from SwitzerlandThey really do test the people before and after they have been vaccinated. They [tested] To determine the effect of the vaccine on the same person, cardiovascular indicators are used. The individual is being tested both before and after the vaccination.

It is amazing what they discovered. They discovered a significant rate of cardiovascular adverse indicators. However, in particular, one to 50 and one to 30 have what they call elevated troponin. This indicator is the most important. heart muscle damage.

Elevated troponin alone is not enough to diagnose myocarditis. However, it is a primary indicator. Many of these patients don’t have any obvious symptoms.

DAN SKORBACH

That’s the most alarming part. Even though damage has been done to the heart tissue and the person might not believe there is anything wrong, it’s possible for them to feel nothing. This is how cardiac arrest can suddenly cause death while people go about their daily lives.

DR. RETSEF LEVI

We are now at the point when we need to consider myocarditis rates among young adults. You have to think of rates that are significantly higher than the agreed-upon clinical rates by the CDC, Ministry of Health and everyone. [agreed on]. You can find one in every 2,500 to one in five thousand, depending on your age. These are the clinical rates. We now know that subclinical rates can be as high as 50 to 100 times.

This is true for each dose. It’s a Russian Roulette every time you get this vaccine. It could cause heart disease. At this time, we don’t understand the mechanism. While we don’t know which gender is more susceptible or less, we do know that boys are more likely to be harmed. According to a study in Switzerland, women are just as susceptible to being hurt.

At this point, I believe that the best way to keep the narrative alive is to use a variety of tactics. “safe and effective vaccines” They claim that they have all the evidence, and can isolate it. “oh, you cannot conclude from that anything.”

My point is that if you have many trees, you must see the forest at some point. The evidence we have of the forest is strong proof that vaccines can cause death. They are killing. They are killing at an alarming rate. Is there any long term impact? There are many open questions. It’s certainly beyond any acceptable threshold we have ever known.

We pulled the vaccines from the market that had killed one in 100,000 people. One is one million. You would be surprised at how close this is. This is because young children and adolescents are at minimal or zero risk of COVID-19. This is especially true with the current variant and after they were exposed. At this point, you must ask yourself, “When are you going to stop?”

DAN SKORBACH

When will we stop? In the U.S., things are happening at the state level.

Florida’s surgeon-general is now recommends against The mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for men aged 18 to 39.

Idaho has republican lawmakers that have just introduced a bill This would make it illegal to administer any mRNA-based vaccine.

Even Congress is making progress. The Republican-chaired Select Subcommittee on Coronavirus Pandemic looks to investigate How covid vaccines were created and approved. Because the republicans are now in the majority, they have the power to subpoena witnesses who refuses to testify.

Legislation takes time. America may face a larger crisis in the meantime.

DR. RETSEF LEVI

Public trust in public health authorities is a serious problem. I’m concerned because, as a scientist, I believe medicine can save lives and help people live longer.

To resolve this issue, we need to look at the problems with our systems. What is the worst thing about our regulatory system? What is suboptimal regarding the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and academia, scientists, and regulatory authorities What is wrong with our social media and tech companies? This is where we need to really think about what went wrong. We need to think deeply about what went wrong so we can create the right processes and systems, as well as the legislation, that will hopefully prevent it from happening again.

Because I believe we need to maintain democracy, we must accept that health authorities make cautious scientific decisions with the best intentions and that people’s health is at the centre of these decisions. But I doubt that this is the public sentiment. [that] It is found in many countries. This is very dangerous.

DAN SKORBACH

What do you think? Is Dr. Levi right? Are you still willing to put your faith in our health authorities What would it take to regain your trust? Please leave a comment below. Please share this video with a friend.

This is Frontline Health. Dan Skorbach.

———–

* Serious adverse events that we cite from this study (Fraiman et al., 2022) are referred to as “serious adverse events of special interest” (AESI). They include: Bell’s Palsy, Encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, Acute kidney injury, Acute liver injury, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Coagulation disorder, Myocarditis/pericarditis, Other forms of acute cardiac injury, Generalized Convulsions, Abscess, Arthritis, Cholecystitis, Colitis/Enteritis, Diarrhea, Hyperglycemia, Hyponatremia, Pancreatitis, Psychosis, and Thyroiditis.

———–

Anna Varavva edited the transcript to be concise and clear.

Disclaimer:

Frontline Health (the “Show”It is intended to provide informational purposes only and includes guests and contributors as well as the most recent news about health and medical discoveries. The Show is not intended to provide medical advice or treatment for any disease or condition. The Show is not meant to be used for self-diagnosis and self-treatment of any health-related condition.

The Show’s information was gathered from reliable sources. However, Frontline Health and The Epoch Times Association Inc. cannot be held responsible for errors or omissions in reporting. They also disclaim any liability for damages of any kind, including special, indirect, consequential, special or exemplary.

For medical advice and information regarding diagnosis or treatment, patients should consult a doctor.

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health encourages professional discussion and friendly debate. These guidelines will help you submit your opinion piece. our form here.

Read More From Original Article Here: ‘Colossal Failure’: Did This Just Become the Worst Public Health Disaster in History?