Conservative Goes to War with CNN Panel Over Abortion in Heated Segment – ‘I’ll Have to Speak Up for the Babies’

The ⁢article discusses a heated debate that occurred on CNN following a vice presidential debate, centering ‍on‌ the topic‍ of abortion. Scott ⁣Jennings, a conservative ‌contributor for CNN, argued for the protection of infants born alive during abortion procedures, asserting ​that there have been cases of such infants not receiving life-saving care in Minnesota. He accused Democratic Minnesota Governor Tim Walz of signing legislation that removed these requirements. In ⁣response, Walz and others on the panel contested Jennings’ claims, questioning the circumstances of the⁤ infants’ births and ‍suggesting that the discussion could be ⁢politically disadvantageous ‍for ‌Republicans. The exchange highlighted the ongoing divide in opinions⁢ over abortion rights and the ‌implications of recent legislation. the panel⁢ reflected‌ broader political ⁢tensions around the issue ⁤as⁣ it relates to the upcoming‍ elections.


CNN conservative contributor Scott Jennings got into a battle with multiple people during a post-vice presidential debate panel regarding the issue of abortion, stating he will “speak up for the babies.”

During the debate, Republican Sen. J.D. Vance charged that Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz had signed legislation that removed the requirement that babies who are born alive during an abortion procedure receive life-saving care.

“That is fundamentally barbaric,” Vance said.

Walz responded, “That’s not true. That’s not how the law is.”

A CNN panel made up of Jennings, David Axelrod, Alyssa Farah Griffin, Anderson Cooper and Ashley Allison addressed the issue following the debate.

“This thing in Minnesota, there were eight deaths among infants who survived abortion attempts during Tim Walz’s tenure as governor. It happened. They don’t want to talk about the fact that it happened. But there were children,” Jennings said.

“What’s the source?” Griffin asked.

Axelrod then jumped in, saying, “First of all, let me ask you a question, since you’ve deeply researched this. What were the condition of these babies when they were born? What was the participation of the family?”

“Tell me what their condition was, Scott. Could they have survived, and was it a case of families not wanting children to suffer who were — when they were told that they are doomed?” Axelrod asked.

Allison then told Jennings that he and other Republicans should keep talking about abortion, because it helps Democrats maintain their gender gap with women.

“You guys are not winning. And if you run on this issue, you will not win in November,” she said.

Jennings responded, “They’re not running on this issue. They’re running on …”

Allison interrupted him saying, “They’re lying on this issue.”

“They’re running on, ‘It’s up to the states.’ And they’re running on Donald Trump’s moderate position of some reasonable restrictions. Rape, incest and life of the mother,” Jennings continued.

Axelrod responded that Trump’s “moderate position has been adopted over the course of this campaign for purposes of this campaign, after he put the justices on the Supreme Court who overturned Roe, who’ve created a crisis for women who live in 20 states in this country.”

Jennings reiterated, “His position is moderate and it is in line with what I think most Americans want. And I think Harris and Walz have proven they cannot discuss even a single restriction that they want.”

Allison then cut off Jennings in a back-and-forth with Axelrod, saying, “This is what Kamala Harris and Tim Walz believe, is that it’s none of your business what women do with their body, and so stay out of our doctors’ offices and stay out of our bed.”

Jennings fired back, “Well, I guess I’ll have to speak up for the babies. They’re not here to speak for themselves. Lord, have mercy.”

He later posted on X a link to a fact check from “The Dispatch” concluding Walz did sign legislation in May 2023 repealing provisions from Minnesota’s 2015 Born Alive Infants Protection Act as well as others from a 1976 statute regarding the matter.

The news outlet reported, “The [2023] bill left intact the first subdivision—which read ‘All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child’—but changed its language requiring medical personnel to ‘preserve the life and health of the born alive infant’ to instead require medical personnel to ‘care for the infant who is born alive.’”

“The bill also repealed many of Minnesota’s abortion reporting requirements, including information about born-alive infants.”




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker