The epoch times

Court speeds up Trump’s appeal in defamation case over ‘absolute immunity’.

The Second Circuit appeals ‍court has denied former President Donald Trump’s request to pause ‍a court decision while he⁣ appeals‌ the defamation case writer E. Jean Carroll brought against him, but it has ordered that the appeal be expedited.

“It would‌ be in the interest of the parties, as confirmed ​during oral argument, for the⁣ Court ‌to resolve ‌the issue⁢ of ⁣absolute ⁢presidential immunity as presented in the⁤ two appeals expeditiously,” ⁢the ‍court clerk wrote on Wednesday.

President Trump will have to submit his brief by Sept.‍ 28,​ and Ms. Carroll a response 15 days after that,‌ after which Mr. Trump can file a response within five days if necessary. A panel will be assigned to hear the case.

“The parties’ extensive briefing thus ⁤far makes clear that they have already⁤ substantially⁢ developed their arguments on the ⁣merits of that and ⁤related issues,” the ‍clerk ‍wrote.

The case‌ it‌ set ⁣to go to​ trial‌ Jan. 15, 2024, ‌incidentally the same day New Hampshire has‍ set⁤ its Republican primary. The former ⁢president⁣ is campaigning to run for reelection‌ in 2024 and faces a busy court schedule as he​ continues to lead the GOP field by double‍ digits.

A federal judge had​ denied President‍ Trump’s request ⁢to delay ⁢the trial,⁤ and denied another⁤ motion to dismiss the suit ‌entirely based ‌on the “absolute immunity” a U.S. president is granted.⁤ President Trump’s countersuit alleging Ms. ‌Carroll defamed him was also ​thrown⁤ out.

Judge‍ Lewis Kaplan, presiding over the ⁣case, has previously ​ruled against President Trump in​ several motions related to the cases Ms. Carroll‌ brought against him.

⁢ In the current case, the judge has already ruled for Ms. Carroll, writing that the trial in January⁤ will only⁤ deal with how much President Trump owes her in ‌damages.

Two​ Lawsuits

Ms. Carroll had first brought ⁢the defamation case against ⁣the former president in 2022, based on remarks he made in office denying​ her⁣ allegations of sexual assault, later updated to include several more ⁤comments he made to ⁤the press ‌out of office.

Ms. ​Carroll ⁤had alleged that President Trump raped her, in 1996, in a department store dressing ⁤room.⁢ He denied‌ this via a ‌statement ⁢and ⁤later in interviews and comments to the press, alleging he had never met her and‍ that‍ she had⁢ made ⁢the ‌story up.

Ms. Carroll then sought damages for his comments in one lawsuit,⁢ and later⁤ brought forth a ⁢second lawsuit when New York passed the Adult Survivors‌ Act, allowing⁢ victims ⁣to bring forth sexual offense cases outside of the statute of limitations for one year, between November 2022 and November 2023.

In May, a jury awarded ⁤Ms. Carroll $5 million in the second lawsuit, finding him ‍liable for both defamation and “sexual battery,” which is⁣ the term the court used. Attorneys⁣ for​ President Trump noted that even though Ms. Carroll had brought forward a “rape” case, the jury did not⁢ rule that he had raped her, ‌yet still ruled in her favor. President Trump appealed the ruling, but a judge ​denied both a new trial for the case or a reduction to‌ the damages he was ordered to pay Ms.‌ Carroll.

‌ The court ‌also allowed Ms. Carroll to amend her first ⁣lawsuit to seek ​more damages, which she did,⁣ asking for ⁤$10 ⁢million.⁣ A jury in the‌ January‌ trial will decide how much Ms. Carroll is to be awarded, if President Trump’s⁤ immunity defense ⁢does not hold up.

Absolute ⁣Immunity

⁢ The “absolute immunity”‍ of a president arose from the​ section of ⁣the‍ U.S.​ Constitution describing his official duties. Although it does ⁤not⁤ include ⁣”immunity,”⁣ various U.S.‍ Supreme⁢ Court rulings that use this section as‍ a basis ⁣have conferred immunity to U.S. presidents for ‌actions taken ⁣while in office.

The first lawsuit against a U.S. president as‍ brought forth in ⁢1867, when the State of Mississippi sued President⁤ Andrew Johnson to‌ delay Reconstruction efforts. The high court ruling ⁢effectively put the president‌ beyond the ⁢sphere of the ‌judiciary, writing that⁢ it had “no ⁤



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker