oann

Today, 187 names from Epstein’s list will be disclosed in court. The rest of the names will be revealed on the 22nd


(Photo by JOHANNES ​EISELE/AFP via Getty Images)

OAN’s Brooke ⁢Mallory
2:09 PM – Wednesday, January 3,⁢ 2024

The court​ in possession of the Jeffrey Epstein client ⁤documents has confirmed that the​ highly anticipated list of 187 names of ⁢Epstein’s acquaintances and colleagues will be made public. ⁣The first names on the list will be revealed today.

Advertisement

The list is part of a settled case filed by Virginia ‍Giuffre, a former Epstein victim,‍ against‌ Ghislaine Maxwell. Despite the case being resolved in 2017, Giuffre and others have long demanded the release of the identities.

Maxwell, 62, has since been found guilty of​ sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in ⁤jail.

However, one of the women involved, referred to as “Jane Doe 107,”⁤ has been granted a 30-day‍ extension due to concerns for her safety if her identity is revealed. This request has caused disruption ​to the process.

In addition to providing an affidavit​ detailing the risk she faces, the woman must ⁢also present evidence of​ the “hate mail” she‍ claims to have received.

“As Doe 107 has previously stated, she lives in a culturally⁢ conservative country and lives in fear of⁤ her name being released,” said ‌attorney Richard Levitt.

Judge Loretta ‌Preska has approved the attorney’s request for an extension, allowing ‍him to submit further “submissions” on behalf of Doe. District‌ Executive for​ the Southern District of New York,‍ Ed Friedland, stated that she‌ and at least⁣ one other individual will remain anonymous until January 22nd, while ⁣the rest of the names on the list will be revealed ⁢by then.

It is expected that Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton, both of whom traveled on Epstein’s ⁣private plane “Lolita Express,” will be mentioned.

The list includes the names of ​187 individuals referenced in a lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against​ Maxwell in 2015.

For years, the names of ⁤those involved in the case have been protected, leading many Americans to question the accountability of powerful public ​figures compared to ordinary citizens.

On December 18th, Judge Preska granted the motions of media outlets and Giuffre, ruling⁣ that the parties mentioned are no longer⁤ legally protected. She agreed to unseal the names to the public.

Alan Dershowitz, Epstein’s former attorney, is another notable figure in favor ‍of the release⁢ of the ‌names.

“The reason‍ I wanted everything put out – and⁣ I don’t think the judge put⁣ everything out, ⁢I think she was selective in what ⁣she put‍ out and that’s unfair,” Dershowitz said. “I wanted them out for‌ personal reasons because I know that they‍ would prove what I’ve said from day one, that I did nothing ‌wrong, and the woman who accused me later admitted that she may ⁢have misidentified⁤ me, confused me with someone else.”

Maxwell, who is still in custody on sex trafficking charges, has not responded to inquiries about the list ⁤or its impending publication.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this ‌post!

Harvard’s former president, Claudine Gay, is ‍facing allegations of plagiarism that⁣ have sparked calls for her‌ resignation. She claims these allegations are personal attacks driven by “racial animus.”

Attorney ​Robert Tyler, known as an “Advocate For Faith​ And Freedom,” warns that Hunter Biden’s contempt charges could ⁢harm his legal case⁤ against former Trump White House aide Garrett Ziegler.

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team has officially appealed the decision of Maine’s secretary of state to remove him from the ballot.

Michael Barasch, a 9/11 survivor,⁤ advocate, and lawyer, applauds ‍Congress for extending health⁣ protections for‍ the 9/11 Survivors’ Health Program.

ChatGPT is quickly gaining popularity and becoming a​ household name even before 2023‍ began.

Apple’s stock fell ⁣nearly 3% to a seven-week low after Barclays downgraded the shares due to concerns about weak demand for its devices in 2024.

Bitcoin surged past $45,000 for the first time since April 2022, driven by ​optimism ‌surrounding the potential approval of exchange-traded spot bitcoin funds.

Chinese regulators have announced a series of rules aimed at…

rnrn

How‌ does the court’s decision to grant anonymity to certain individuals,​ including Jane Doe 107,​ impact the public’s access to information and accountability?

Title: Jeffrey Epstein Documents: Court⁣ Confirms Release of Highly Anticipated List of Names

Introduction:

In a significant development,⁣ the court holding the Jeffrey Epstein client documents has ‍officially announced that the highly anticipated list of 187 names ‌of Epstein’s acquaintances and colleagues will be made public. The release of this list has been eagerly awaited​ by the public, ⁢as it promises⁢ to shed ‍light on the⁣ network of individuals associated with Epstein’s alleged criminal activities. The court has confirmed‍ that the first names on the list will be revealed today, marking ‍a crucial moment in ⁣the investigation.

Background:

The list is part of a settled case filed by ‌Virginia Giuffre, a former Epstein victim, against Ghislaine Maxwell.⁤ Although the case‌ was ​resolved in⁣ 2017, Giuffre and others ​have long demanded the release of the identities⁢ involved. Maxwell, who was recently ⁣found guilty of sex trafficking⁣ and sentenced to 20 years in⁣ jail, has been‌ at the center of the‌ Epstein ⁤scandal.

An Extension for Safety Concerns:

The judicial process ⁣has hit a slight ‌delay due to concerns for⁢ the safety of one ‌of the women involved, referred to as “Jane Doe 107.” Recognizing⁢ the potential risks associated with revealing her identity, the court has granted her a 30-day extension. To secure this extension, the woman must provide evidence of the threats and intimidation she has faced, including presenting an affidavit that ‌details the risk ⁣she faces and ‍the “hate ​mail” ⁢she claims to have received.

Seeking Anonymity:

Richard Levitt, attorney for Jane Doe 107, emphasized the need to maintain her anonymity, highlighting that she‌ resides in a ⁤culturally conservative country and fears the consequences ‍of her name being disclosed.⁢ Judge Loretta Preska has ⁤approved the attorney’s request, allowing for additional submissions on behalf of the woman.⁣ However, ⁤she⁤ and at least one other person will remain anonymous until January 22nd, while the rest of the ⁤names on the list will be revealed by then.

Expected Mention of Prominent ​Figures:

The release of​ the list is expected to implicate‌ prominent individuals, including Prince Andrew‍ and former⁤ President Bill Clinton, both of whom have been linked to Epstein‌ through their travels on his private plane, the “Lolita ‌Express.” ‍The inclusion of their names adds ​to the intrigue and public interest surrounding⁣ this case.

Unsealing⁣ the Names:

For years, ⁣the​ names of those involved⁢ in the Epstein case have been ⁤shielded ​from public​ scrutiny, raising questions about the⁢ accountability of ‍powerful public figures compared to ordinary citizens. However, on December 18th, ⁤Judge ​Preska ruled⁢ in favor of​ unsealing the names ⁢mentioned in the lawsuit filed ​by Virginia Giuffre⁢ and⁢ granted the⁤ motions of media outlets to make ⁢the names public.

Support for Release:

Alan Dershowitz, Epstein’s former ‍attorney, has ⁣publicly voiced his support for the release ⁢of the names,⁢ highlighting the need for⁢ transparency ‍and ⁣fairness. Dershowitz, ⁢who has faced allegations himself, believes the​ release of the names will⁣ vindicate his innocence.

Conclusion:

As the court releases the highly anticipated list of names associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s illicit activities, the​ public eagerly‍ awaits​ the revelations that may ⁢potentially​ expose the extent of​ the network involved. The release of this information is seen⁤ as a crucial step towards ensuring transparency, accountability, and dismantling systems that allow powerful individuals‍ to evade justice.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker