DCCC shares anti-Jordan points with House Dems before speaker vote.

Democrats Circulate Memo Against Jim Jordan Ahead of Speaker Vote

Democrats ‌are making ⁢a last-minute push to sway ⁤lawmakers’ votes on whether to elect Jim Jordan (R-OH) as the next House speaker. Just hours before the vote, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee⁢ circulated a memo containing talking points⁢ to use against‍ Jordan. The memo portrays Jordan as an “extremist”‌ and warns of⁢ the negative impact his⁤ speakership ​would have on‍ working families, democratic norms, and relationships with allies.

The memo also aims to highlight the lack of moderates in the Republican conference, ‍tying any Republicans who vote‌ for ⁤Jordan to former President Donald Trump. Democrats accuse Jordan of being a far-right Republican who would further pull the conference to the right instead of promoting bipartisanship. They point to his role as the founding ⁣member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus as evidence.

The memo‍ lists eight ⁤examples of Jordan’s alleged extremism, including his voting history on key ⁢policy issues and his support for overturning‍ the 2020​ election results⁤ in Pennsylvania and Arizona. Democrats warn that any⁢ Republican⁢ who supports⁤ Jordan’s speakership will face severe ‍consequences.

The vote for the new ‍speaker comes after ⁢former Speaker Kevin McCarthy ​(R-CA) was ousted earlier this month. Jordan secured the GOP‌ nomination and has been⁢ working to secure ⁤the 217 votes needed for the speakership. However, he can only afford ⁤to lose four votes as Democrats are expected to vote for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries​ (D-NY).

While some Republicans‌ have come out against Jordan, others have flipped⁢ their votes in his favor after speaking with him. The margin ⁣of ⁤support may continue to shift once the vote is brought to the floor. If successful, Jordan will assume the leadership position⁢ just one month before the government is scheduled to run⁤ out of money.

Key Points from the⁢ Memo:

• Speaker Jordan would bring extremism and far-right priorities to the⁣ House
• Republicans ‍who support⁤ Jordan are aligned with Trump
• Jordan’s speakership would hinder bipartisanship and weaken relationships ⁤with allies
• Jordan’s​ role in⁢ the House Freedom Caucus showcases his far-right ‍ideology
• Examples of Jordan’s alleged extremism include his voting ⁣history and support for overturning election results

Despite opposition, Jordan’s support may be gaining momentum ahead of the vote. The outcome⁤ will determine the ‌future leadership of the House as Congress faces pressing issues,⁤ including the need to ⁢pass appropriations bills before the government runs out of funding.

Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.

How are Democrats using⁢ this memo to mobilize their members and make a case against electing Jordan‍ as the next House speaker?

A founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, a conservative group known for their hardline stances and opposition to compromise.

Furthermore, the memo raises concerns‌ about Jordan’s involvement ‌in the handling of sexual abuse allegations during his time as ⁤an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State‍ University. Democrats argue that Jordan’s failure to adequately address the ​allegations ‌and protect the students under his supervision raises questions about his‌ character ⁣and fitness for leadership.

The Democratic Party is utilizing this memo to‍ mobilize⁢ their members ‍and make a persuasive case against electing Jordan as the next House speaker. By portraying him ⁣as an ‌extremist and linking him to former President Trump, Democrats seek to ⁢appeal to more moderate and independent lawmakers who may be hesitant to support a candidate with such strong ⁢partisan ties.

In addition, the memo highlights the potential consequences of a Jordan speakership on working families, democratic⁣ norms, and ⁢international relationships.‌ Democrats argue⁤ that Jordan’s⁢ right-wing ideology and his lack of willingness‍ to seek bipartisan solutions would hinder progress on important issues ⁢such ‍as healthcare, education, and economic recovery. They also express concerns that Jordan’s undying loyalty to Trump could threaten⁣ the integrity of democratic institutions and damage ⁤crucial ​alliances with foreign partners.

The timing of this memo speaks to the urgency felt by Democrats to prevent Jordan’s ‍ascent to the speakership. With just hours remaining before the vote, Democrats are seizing every opportunity to sway the opinions of lawmakers and shape the outcome in their favor. They are relying on‌ the power of persuasion‍ and evidence-based arguments to dissuade any wavering Republicans from casting their vote in support of Jordan.

The ⁤circulation of this memo underscores the ⁢intense polarization and partisan divisions within the House of Representatives.​ As a deeply divided Congress grapples with critical issues and challenges, ⁤the outcome of the speaker vote holds significant implications for the future direction and effectiveness of legislative action. Both parties⁣ understand⁢ the stakes at hand and are employing all tactics at their⁤ disposal to secure ‍victory for their respective candidates.

Ultimately, the decision on‌ whether⁢ to elect Jim Jordan as the next House speaker rests in the hands of lawmakers. The circulating of ⁢this memo by Democrats is an expression of their determination to prevent Jordan’s rise to power and ⁤shape the narrative surrounding his candidacy. As‍ the vote looms, all eyes will be on the House floor as representatives cast their ballots and determine the direction of one of the ⁣most ⁢influential positions in American politics.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases