The epoch times

Democrat AGs vow to back corporate DEI efforts following SCOTUS ruling.

Democrat⁤ Attorneys General ⁣Support Corporate DEI Efforts

A⁢ group of‌ Democrat attorneys‌ general⁣ are pushing back ​on ‍the behalf of corporations, stating on Wednesday​ they⁤ would⁣ not ‍be prosecuting companies⁣ for⁤ their ⁣diversity, equity, and⁢ inclusion (DEI) efforts.

The Supreme Court’s ‍recent⁣ ruling against⁤ the⁣ use⁤ of race ​in ⁣the consideration of ⁣college applicants had a quick ⁤ripple‌ effect, bringing on ⁤a legal challenge against⁢ Harvard‌ for ⁣legacy ‌preferences, as well as warnings to corporations⁣ coming​ from⁢ America ‌First ⁣Legal (AFL), and 13 Republican⁢ attorneys general.

Now, ‍21 Democrat ⁢attorney generals⁢ have issued ⁢a⁣ letter to ⁤the Fortune 100‌ CEOs, assuring them‍ their corporate diversity ‍programs are “lawful and serve important⁤ business⁤ purposes.”

They ⁣applauded the companies’ ‌DEI‍ efforts​ as “ethically⁣ responsible, good ‌for‌ business, ​and ⁣good for ‍building‍ America’s workforce.”

⁣​

‌ ‍⁤

“The ⁣letter you ‍received‌ from the ⁢13 state‍ attorneys general is intended to intimidate ​you ⁣into rolling ⁢back the progress‍ many ⁤of you​ have made,” wrote ⁣Nevada Attorney⁣ General Aaron​ Ford. ⁣He ‍was​ joined by ⁣attorneys⁣ general ⁣from Arizona,⁤ California,‌ Colorado, Connecticut, ⁤Delaware, ​Hawaii,​ Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,⁤ Minnesota,⁢ New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, ‍Oregon, Rhode⁢ Island, ⁣Vermont,⁣ Washington,​ and the District of Columbia.

⁣ ⁣

Zero-Sum Race Factors

Prior to the ruling‍ last month, in ⁣states⁤ without ‍an⁤ affirmative action ‍ban, universities that ⁢considered race did ‍so ‍in compliance with ​the⁣ decision⁢ set‌ forth in​ Grutter v. Bollinger, which ruled‌ that race could⁣ be used as a “plus”​ factor,⁢ but⁤ could‌ never count ‍against‍ an ​applicant.

With⁣ the most recent ruling,​ the high court deemed it time to sunset Grutter.​ College‍ admissions are necessarily “zero sum,”‍ Chief Justice John⁣ Roberts wrote in the ‍majority opinion​ (pdf). By benefitting ⁤some ​applicants​ on the ⁤basis of‌ their ⁢race, it​ “necessarily advantages ​the ⁢former⁢ group ‌at the‍ expense​ of the latter.”

⁣ Proponents‌ of affirmative ⁣action⁢ hold‍ signs during a protest at Harvard ‍University in ⁤Cambridge,⁢ Mass.,‍ on July 1, ‌2023. (Joseph ⁢Prezioso/AFP ​via‌ Getty⁢ Images)

Justice ‌Neil‌ Gorsuch wrote in a‍ concurring⁤ opinion ⁣that⁣ it was ‍by definition discrimination “to⁣ treat that individual worse⁣ than others who are similarly situated.”

“And no ​one ​can doubt‌ that both schools intentionally treat some applicants​ worse ⁣than others ‍at least‌ in part because‍ of​ their race,” ‍he‍ wrote.

AFL ‌put‍ companies ‌on⁣ notice the same ⁢day ⁢the ruling came⁣ out.

“AFL⁤ has documented in a plethora⁢ of ⁤Equal ​Employment ⁣Opportunity ​Commission‌ (EEOC)⁤ complaints‍ and ⁢board letters, many ‌of the biggest corporations⁤ in America do exactly what the⁢ Civil ⁢Rights ⁤Act forbids. ⁢They ⁢use⁤ race and sex as ​a stereotype and ⁤as a negative, especially when it comes⁣ to heterosexual⁢ males, whites,​ Jews, ⁤and Asians, intentionally treating ​them worse than ​other job​ applicants⁢ and employees,” it⁣ stated,‍ citing Amazon, ​Anheuser-Busch,‍ Blackrock, ​Hershey, Nordstrom, and ⁣Unilever, among⁤ others.

The Republican‍ attorneys‌ general sent ⁢a letter⁤ to ⁤CEOs of‍ Fortune 100 companies, including‌ Coca-Cola, Microsoft, and ‌Johnson &⁣ Johnson, writing, ​“We ‌urge​ you to immediately cease ‌any unlawful race-based quotas or ​preferences ⁤your ​company‍ has​ adopted⁣ for its ‌employment⁣ and contracting⁢ practices.”

“If ​you choose​ not ‌to⁣ do so, know‌ that ⁣you ⁤will be⁣ held accountable.”

‍⁣

Attorneys​ general,⁤ like other officials, ⁤have over the​ past⁢ year banded together ⁤along⁣ party ⁢lines ​and⁣ across state lines to send message in the nation’s culture ‍war.

‍ ⁣

A week ​after​ the​ Republicans’ letter, Democrat attorneys​ general sent ⁣their‌ own⁤ to‍ the ‌same⁣ companies, assuring ‌them they ⁢have reviewed the‌ previous letter and⁣ that​ “the⁤ baseless assertion⁣ that⁣ any⁣ attempts ​to​ address racial ⁣disparity are by their very nature unlawful.”

Environmental, ⁤Social, ⁣and Corporate⁣ Governance

The ⁢efficacy of ESG, ‍or ⁤environmental, social,⁤ and corporate governance, has ⁤been a ‌recent ‍concerns at ​the​ top ‍levels of government. ⁤Spotlight‍ fell​ on ⁣corporations’ ‍willingness ⁤to ⁤lose money‌ over⁤ making statements⁣ on ⁣environmental ‌or⁢ social issues with⁣ recent ⁤Target​ and Bud ‌Light boycotts.

‍ ⁣

Cans of Bud⁤ Light⁢ sit⁢ in a​ cooler in ⁣Baltimore, Maryland, on June 30,‍ 2023. (Rob ⁤Carr/Getty‍ Images)‍

The Democrat attorneys ⁣general maintain that ⁢these are ⁤legitimate efforts ‍because⁣ they‌ “help​ combat these inequities” driven by race. They asserted ‍that “decades of discrimination” was reason to ⁣seek⁤ increased ‍racial ⁢diversity ⁢through ‌“race-neutral inclusion efforts” ​that⁢ cannot be ​termed‍ “quotas.”

The letter, addressed‌ to Fortune 100 ⁢CEOs,⁣ made‌ mention ‍of a statistic that only



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker