Conservative News Daily

Democrat-Controlled City Pushes Granting Non-Citizens Right to Vote: ‘Build a City That Is for Everyone’

The Birthplace of the American Revolution Could Soon⁣ Offer ‌Foreign Nationals the‌ Chance to Shape Its Future

Democratic leaders in Boston⁤ are pushing to allow non-U.S.⁤ citizens to vote ⁣in⁣ municipal elections, according to the Boston Herald.

The proposal was introduced on Wednesday by City Councilor Kendra Lara‌ and would apply to all residents who​ have “legal status,” ⁢presumably ‌green card holders and people in the city on work ⁢visas.

Lara passionately argues ⁣that denying non-citizens the right to vote⁤ is “a violation of one of⁣ our foundational American principles.”

“By moving this ⁢home rule petition forward, Boston can begin the process of ⁤making good on our ‍promise to build a city that ⁢is for everyone,” she added.

Lara ​highlights the ⁤significant⁤ contributions of immigrants with “legal‌ status” in ‍Boston, stating that they pay $2.3 billion in taxes every year and hold about $6 billion in “collective⁢ spending power.”

(She also mentions that ‍they make up 28 percent of the city’s population, but according to U.S. census data, that number includes illegal immigrants and naturalized citizens.)

The Herald reports that several City Council members‌ support the ‌proposal, ⁤including Democrat Ricardo Arroyo, who ⁢believes it ⁣could boost voter ⁤turnout numbers.

However, Democratic Councilor-at-Large Michael Flaherty raises legal concerns, pointing to a similar measure passed in New York​ City and ‍struck down ​by a state ⁣court.

Flaherty acknowledges the importance ​of finding a⁢ solution and maintaining an inclusive community, ‍stating, “We need ‍to find a way ​through this, we need to continue to be inviting⁢ and welcoming to new Bostonians, we need to encourage all⁢ that community involvement and participation,” according to Boston.com.

The City​ Council will continue to discuss the matter.

As Flaherty points ‍out, a measure ‌was passed in New⁢ York last year allowing the estimated 800,000 to 1 million non-citizens living in the ​city to‌ participate in ⁤local elections, but it was later blocked​ by a judge ruling that it violated the state constitution.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing ⁤Editor:

What ⁢if you‌ woke ​up one morning and half of the people you ​count on had⁣ just vanished⁢ overnight?

That happened to me recently. I ⁢got up, ⁤came to work here at The Western ⁣Journal, and when I‍ got ⁤to⁢ my office, ⁢literally⁣ half of​ our readers had vanished. They were just gone. We had been⁤ nuked by Facebook,⁤ and it⁢ had happened almost ⁤instantly.

But⁤ it was even⁣ worse. Facebook⁢ hit ‍us at the same time 90 ‍percent⁣ of advertisers had essentially boycotted us. “Brutal” is a word I’ve used a lot lately.

The ⁤fight for​ the truth is brutal. The fight for‌ America’s soul is brutal. What the government⁢ is doing to Jan. 6 detainees is brutal. What surgeons are doing to confused children is brutal.

It’s a fight we must win. But we ‌can’t win⁣ without you.

A membership to​ The Western Journal ​will go much farther than you think. It costs less than a cup⁤ of Starbucks coffee, and for that small price you⁢ get access‌ to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles — you’ll experience a radically ⁢reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight against leftism.

Can I count on you to ⁤ join​ today?

We need​ your help. Benjamin Franklin summed up ‍the situation we’re all facing ⁢when he said, “We must⁣ all hang together, ‍or, most assuredly,‍ we shall all hang separately.”

Please become a‍ member today.

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal

The post​ Democrat-Controlled City Pushes Granting Non-Citizens Right to Vote: ‘Build a City That Is for Everyone’ appeared ‍first on The Western Journal.

Should non-U.S. citizens be allowed to vote in municipal elections​ in⁢ Boston,⁢ considering its historical significance in American history

Major advertiser’s budget disappeared, ‌due to a sudden policy change. Our revenue plummeted, and our ability to ‍reach our audience ⁣was severely compromised. The impact‍ was devastating.

This experience opened my eyes to the power that social media platforms hold over our ability⁣ to communicate and engage with our readers. It highlighted⁤ the urgent need for diversification and ‌the importance of not relying solely on one⁤ platform for our survival.

But ​it also made me realize the importance of our readers – each and every one of you. It reminded me ​of the vital role you play in shaping not only our future, but⁣ the⁤ future of ⁢our country.

The proposal⁣ to allow non-U.S.⁢ citizens ‌to vote ⁢in municipal elections in Boston raises⁢ important questions and sparks a crucial debate. Should non-citizens be given the opportunity to shape the future of a city that holds such⁤ historical significance in American history?

On one ⁤hand, proponents argue that non-citizens contribute economically and⁢ socially to ​the city, paying taxes and holding significant purchasing power. They argue that denying them the right to​ vote is a violation ​of the ‌principles upon which this nation ‌was founded – the principles of inclusivity and equality.

On the other hand, opponents raise legal concerns and point to the potential precedent this could set. They ⁢argue that citizenship holds a special significance and ‌that allowing non-citizens to vote undermines⁤ the integrity of the democratic ⁤process.

This debate is not unique to Boston. It is a conversation that‍ is happening in cities across the​ country. New York City’s attempt to ‍grant​ voting ⁤rights to non-citizens was ultimately struck down by a court ruling. However, the fact that this conversation ⁣is taking place⁣ signifies a growing recognition of the ‌importance of immigrant​ communities and their ⁤contributions to⁣ the fabric of our society.

As we continue to discuss and debate this proposal, it is important to remember the principles that our nation was built on -⁣ principles of freedom, democracy, and⁤ equality. We must carefully weigh the pros and cons, considering both ‌the legal implications and the impact on our ⁣democratic ‍system.

Ultimately, the decision will have far-reaching consequences, not ‍only for Boston but for the entire nation. It will shape the future ⁤of American democracy and define the ⁢extent to which we stand by our principles.

So as we navigate this challenging moment in our history, let us remember the power of our voices and the responsibility we have to​ shape the future we want. Let us engage in thoughtful, respectful dialogue and work towards a future that truly represents the collective ⁤will of all who call this great nation home.

Because in the end, it is not just ‌about who gets to vote, but about the kind of ‌society⁣ we want to create – a society that celebrates diversity, values inclusivity, and ensures equal opportunity⁢ for‍ all.

Let us remember⁣ the birthplace of the American ‍Revolution and honor the ideals that sparked a nation. Let​ us work together to shape a⁢ future that reflects the values that define us as Americans.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker