Democrat suggests rule change to protect Speaker Johnson from removal

A Centrist Democrat Floats Fail-Safe Measure to Protect Speaker Mike Johnson

A centrist Democrat is reportedly proposing a fail-safe measure to safeguard Speaker Mike Johnson ‌(R-LA) from being ousted⁣ by members‍ of his ‍own conference. The resolution, sponsored by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), aims to amend House rules, requiring the support of⁤ Republican or Democratic Party leadership before a motion to‌ vacate, the procedure used to remove Speaker Kevin McCarthy,‌ can be brought to⁣ the floor.

If ‍this proposal becomes a reality, it would provide Johnson with some breathing ‌room as he tackles bipartisan legislation on government ‌spending and ‍foreign aid, which has faced opposition from hard-line conservatives.

Currently, any member can propose a motion to remove the House speaker. ⁤McCarthy agreed to this rule to secure the gavel for himself, only to be ousted nine months later. Despite Johnson’s unanimous vote within the GOP‍ conference, he has also faced threats of being removed from his position.

Shortly after McCarthy’s removal, several Republicans suggested changing House rules to make it harder to remove the speaker. However, these proposals have yet ​to materialize during Johnson’s speakership.

This resolution comes at a time when Johnson is under pressure from both parties to bring bipartisan legislation to the floor, providing aid⁢ to Ukraine,⁣ Israel, and‌ Taiwan. However, doing so could jeopardize his position, as some lawmakers ‍have already ⁢threatened a ‍motion to vacate if the⁢ Ukraine‍ aid receives a⁢ vote.

Johnson may also⁢ face other challenges as Congress‌ approaches its next shutdown deadline on March⁣ 1, which will likely require a bipartisan deal to keep the government⁢ open.

It ⁤remains uncertain how much support there is among Democrats to provide Johnson with⁢ a safety net, especially considering that all Democrats voted in favor of removing McCarthy last year. However, only a few votes would be needed to save him, and several lawmakers have reportedly expressed interest in avoiding a repeat of last fall.

Johnson, on his part, remains confident in his leadership position, stating, “I don’t think ​I’m in any jeopardy of being ‘vacated.’ It’s not ‌something I walk around and think about.”

The Washington ‌Examiner has reached out to a spokesperson for Gottheimer but has not received a ‌response.

How does the fail-safe measure aim to‌ prevent arbitrary or ‌opportunistic efforts to remove the Speaker of the ⁣House?

Used to remove⁣ the Speaker ⁢of the House, can be ‍initiated.

The⁢ proposal comes amidst growing tensions within the Republican Party over the leadership⁣ of Speaker Mike Johnson. A faction of discontented Republicans‍ has ⁢been pushing for Johnson’s removal, citing concerns over his leadership style​ and alleged⁣ lack of inclusivity. However, with the Democratic‍ Party holding a narrow majority in the House, some centrist Democrats fear that the ousting of Johnson could lead to a power vacuum⁣ and further political instability.

Rep. Josh ⁣Gottheimer, a centrist​ Democrat ‍known‍ for his bipartisan approach, ‌believes that⁣ this ⁣fail-safe measure could⁢ provide stability in ⁣the face of potential leadership‍ challenges. By requiring the ‌support of either party’s leadership, the amendment aims to prevent opportunistic plots to remove the Speaker,⁤ ensuring that any such ⁤move is based on consensus and⁣ not ‍driven ⁣by internal party wrangling.

In a statement, Gottheimer argued that safeguarding the Speaker from being ousted by a minority faction would protect the integrity⁤ of the House and maintain a sense of stability necessary​ for​ effective governance. He emphasized that such protection is essential, ⁤especially in times of partisan polarization and political volatility.

While the proposal may face opposition ⁢from both sides of the aisle, Gottheimer believes that it is a necessary step ⁢to⁤ restore faith ⁢in the House leadership and prevent internal power struggles from overshadowing legislative priorities. The centrist Democrat⁢ has ​actively sought support⁢ from like-minded colleagues, including Republican lawmakers who view​ Johnson as a⁢ reliable partner in⁤ advancing bipartisan initiatives.

However, critics argue that the proposed amendment ⁣could undermine the ⁣principle of accountability within party ranks. They argue that elected officials⁤ should have the autonomy ​to challenge their party leadership if they believe it is not acting in the best interests of the American people. By requiring the support of party leadership, the fail-safe measure could ⁢shield​ underperforming or controversial Speakers ⁤from facing‌ the consequences of their actions.

Despite ‍the criticisms, the proposal has gained traction among moderate lawmakers from both‍ parties who believe in the‌ importance of stability and bipartisan cooperation. ‍They argue that protecting the Speaker from arbitrary removal would allow for better​ continuity and effectiveness ⁣in the legislative process.

The‌ fate ⁢of Rep. Josh Gottheimer’s fail-safe measure⁢ remains uncertain as it⁣ faces​ scrutiny and debate within the halls of Congress. Its implementation could have far-reaching implications for the way⁢ Speakers are chosen and removed in the future. As factions within parties grow ‍more pronounced and political polarization intensifies, finding common ground and maintaining stability may prove‌ crucial to the functioning of⁤ the House and the advancement of legislative agendas.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases