Democratic judge removes Trump from Illinois ballot
Democrat State Judge Orders Removal of Donald Trump from Presidential Ballot
A state judge in Illinois has made a controversial ruling, ordering that former President Donald Trump be removed from the presidential ballot. The judge, Tracie R. Porter, claims that Trump engaged in insurrection during the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
“The Soros-funded Democrat front-groups continue to attempt to interfere in the election and deny President Trump his rightful place on the ballot,” a spokesperson for the Trump Campaign said in a statement. “Today, an activist Democrat judge in Illinois summarily overruled the state’s board of elections and contradicted earlier decisions from dozens of other state and federal jurisdictions. This is an unconstitutional ruling that we will quickly appeal. In the meantime, President Trump remains on the Illinois ballot, is dominating the polls, and will Make America Great Again!”
Judge Porter’s ruling overturns the State Board of Elections’ decision to keep Trump on the ballot, despite a group of voters accusing him of insurrection. Porter argues that Trump should be kept off the ballot based on the 14th Amendment’s ban on insurrectionists holding office.
However, it is important to note that Trump has never been charged with insurrection in the Special Counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case against him in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing the issue of Trump’s eligibility, as he was also removed from the ballot in Colorado due to a similar tactic by a small group of voters.
14th Amendment and the Ban on Insurrectionists
Section 3 of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment prohibits former officeholders who have “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office again. It states:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
How does the removal of a candidate from the ballot based on alleged misconduct undermine the principles of democracy and fair representation?
Itutional and politically motivated attack on the democratic process.”
The ruling comes as a shock to many, as it sets a dangerous precedent for political interference in the election process. By removing a candidate from the ballot based on alleged misconduct, regardless of any legal process or conviction, it undermines the principles of democracy and fair representation.
Furthermore, the judge’s decision appears to be politically motivated. It is no secret that there has been a great divide among Americans in the aftermath of the January 6 riot. While it is crucial to hold those responsible for any criminal actions accountable, it is inappropriate for a judge to use their position to target a specific individual for political gain.
The Trump campaign argues that this ruling is another attempt by Democrat-affiliated groups to undermine the former president and prevent him from participating in the democratic process. Accusing the judge of being influenced by liberal billionaire George Soros and other Democrat organizations only adds fuel to the fire of partisan politics.
Moreover, this ruling raises concerns about the impartiality and integrity of the judicial system. Judges are expected to make decisions based on the law and unbiased analysis of the facts, not on personal beliefs or political alignments. When a judge fails to adhere to these principles, it erodes public trust in the judicial system as a fair and impartial arbiter.
It is essential to remember that everyone, including politicians, is entitled to due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The January 6 riot is still under investigation, and no formal charges have been brought against Donald Trump for engaging in insurrection. To remove him from the presidential ballot based on mere allegations is a clear violation of this fundamental principle of justice.
Regardless of personal opinions on Donald Trump or any other political figure, it is crucial to uphold the principles of democracy and fairness. Allowing a judge to unilaterally remove a candidate from the ballot without due process sets a dangerous precedent that could be exploited in the future for political gain.
The Trump campaign has vowed to fight this ruling and explore all legal options to ensure that their candidate remains on the presidential ballot. They argue that this decision is not only unconstitutional but also an attack on the millions of Americans who voted for and continue to support Donald Trump.
As this legal battle unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of an independent judiciary that upholds the principles of democracy and the rule of law. Only through a fair and just legal process can we ensure that every citizen’s voice is heard and respected in the election process.
It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact the upcoming election, but one thing is clear: the fight for fairness and impartiality in the political arena is far from over.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...