The federalist

Democrats are realizing that political violence can occur from both sides

The Media’s New Narrative: Republicans ⁤and Political Violence

The accomplice ‍media evidently got a new set of instructions from Joe Biden’s people that they need to start hyping up ‌the possibility of violence coming from Republicans ahead of the election.

Democrats may finally have​ gotten the message ‍that the threat of force‌ isn’t a political⁤ tool that only they ‌get to use, which⁣ is great⁢ news. Now that they’ve realized it, though, they’re trying to convince voters ⁣that it’s only a real problem when their opponents do it,⁤ namely (of course) Trump voters.

An article at the⁣ leftist Vox site at the start ⁤of the year acknowledged that threats of violence “are ​coming from across​ the political ​spectrum.” It said,⁤ however, that “the most important ones … emanate from⁣ the MAGA faithful.”

The ‍New York Times’ Jamelle Bouie ⁣ominously predicted ‍ last week that the former president might “use the threat⁤ of violence⁤ to make officials and⁢ ordinary election workers think twice about their decisions.”‍ On⁣ the same day, his neckbeard colleague David French claimed ​ in​ a separate column that “while political violence is hardly ⁤exclusive to the ⁣right, the hostility and ‍vitriol embedded in MAGA America is ⁣resulting ​in an escalating wave of threats and acts of intimidation.”

MSNBC’s Alex Wagner on Friday whined that Trump has “fanned the flames” of prior ‌“acts of political violence.”

All of this immediately followed — purely by coincidence, no doubt — a series of⁤ public remarks⁣ by ⁣Joe Biden making a big show‌ about how he strongly, seriously, emphatically condemns political violence (wink, wink).

The advantage Democrats have ​had in recent ​years is that, unlike independent and Republican⁣ voters, they know their activists put politics above everything else. For them, only ​one ​thing matters: getting their way. If that means destroying public property and ⁢private businesses, so‌ be it. If a few people ‌are ⁣hospitalized or die for ​it, that’s a⁢ price they’re willing to pay.

Intimidation and harassment ⁢are their default strategies. It’s their voters who screamed ⁤in the faces of perfect ‍strangers for not wearing face coverings. It’s their voters who torched ⁣and trashed⁣ inner ⁢cities in the​ name of “racial justice.” It’s their⁢ voters who showed up to ​menace Supreme Court justices at their private residences. It’s their voters ginning up a second Holocaust over a religious conflict between two nations 6,000 miles away.

True, the other side showed on that one fateful day that it’s capable of ‍taking things to the streets ‌when things ⁢aren’t going so smoothly.​ But‍ rather than Democrats saying to themselves, “Hmm, maybe we should all settle down some,” ⁣they⁢ proceeded to censor, prosecute, and disenfranchise their opponents.

If there has⁢ been any increase ⁤in violent threats ⁢from the‌ right, ⁣Democrats have themselves to thank for it.⁣ They might do themselves a favor ⁣this time and knock it off before any of those threats are made good.

They‌ chose to drive ​down this road. Now they understand it’s a two-way street.


How can the media ensure they maintain journalistic integrity ⁤and present a balanced portrayal of political violence, considering its complex ‌nature and involvement from multiple factors?

Olence and that it has‍ no place⁤ in‌ American democracy. It seems as though there is a coordinated effort by ⁢the media to push a‍ narrative that Republicans are ​the ones responsible for political violence.

This ⁣new narrative ⁢is concerning for several ⁤reasons. First and ⁢foremost,⁤ it is ‍misleading and unfairly targets one political party. While it is true that there have been instances of violence associated with certain individuals who⁣ support former President Trump, it is wrong to generalize and attribute ⁢this behavior to all Republicans‌ or Trump voters. It is important to remember that violence exists on both sides​ of the political spectrum and should be condemned‌ regardless of who is engaging in it.

Secondly, this narrative is a clear attempt to sway public opinion and influence the upcoming elections. By demonizing Republicans and⁣ highlighting the threat of violence coming from their supporters, ⁢the media is subtly trying to paint the Democratic Party as ​the safer and more stable choice. This is a manipulative tactic that undermines ‌the democratic process and unfairly influences voters.

Furthermore, this narrative ignores the fact that political‍ violence is a complex issue with​ multiple ⁤factors at play. To simplify it as a problem exclusively⁣ caused by one political party is a gross oversimplification that ⁤does not reflect the reality of the situation. The media has a responsibility to present a balanced and accurate portrayal of events, and this one-sided narrative fails to do so.

It is crucial for the media to uphold journalistic integrity and avoid ⁢participating in partisan agendas. By perpetuating a narrative that Republicans are solely responsible for political violence, ‌they are doing a disservice⁤ to the public and undermining the trust that should exist between the ⁤media and its audience.

In conclusion, the media’s new narrative that Republicans are the ones ‌responsible for political violence is misleading, manipulative, and unfair. It fails to reflect the reality ‌of the situation and unfairly targets one political party. It is important for the media to uphold its responsibility to provide balanced and accurate reporting, rather than participating in partisan⁤ agendas. The public deserves unbiased and objective journalism, especially⁣ during ‍critical times like elections.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker