Conservative News Daily

Watch this video from Clarence Thomas’ 1991 confirmation hearing to see why Democrats trying to remove him from the Supreme Court should think twice.

Democrats Who Think They Can Run Clarence Thomas Off the Supreme Court Should‍ Watch This Video from His 1991 Confirmation Hearing

Thursday was a day that ends in Y in a month where ⁣the name consists of letters, so of ⁤course there​ was a hue and cry for⁣ Supreme ⁢Court Justice Clarence Thomas to‍ resign.

On this August ⁢Friday, however, there was a bit⁣ more ammunition⁣ for Democrats: another report, this one from ProPublica, that Thomas received gifts from wealthy friends. As Politico noted, this was “a higher⁤ number ⁢of billionaire benefactors ⁣than was ‍previously reported.”

However, the⁣ evidence that this part of a pattern ⁢of influence-peddling is totally ​speculative — and not particularly good speculation at that.​ Nonetheless, this news is ​roiling a cohort‍ of ​progressive legislators who have evinced no ‌issues with​ the Biden ‌family⁤ receiving millions⁢ of dollars from 1991 confirmation hearing to see why Democrats trying to remove him from the Supreme Court should think twice.”>corrupt overseas billionaire‍ oligarchs thus far.

“Unprecedented. Stunning.⁢ Disgusting. The height of hypocrisy⁣ to wear⁣ the robes of a #SCOTUS and take undisclosed gifts ‍from billionaires who benefit from‍ your ⁣decisions,” Washington Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal said on Twitter.

Sen. Dick Durbin ​ of Illinois called the revelations proof of “a⁢ shameless lifestyle underwritten for years by a gaggle of fawning billionaires,” which sounds a bit⁣ like projection when he’s saying ‌it. Rep. Ted ⁣Lieu ⁣ of California said that Thomas​ “has brought shame upon himself” and “should resign immediately”; again, the projection was heavy among Very Online Democrats:

Of ⁢course, the reason the left wants Justice Thomas ‍off the Supreme Court ‌is too transparent to even bother naming: The Democrats control the White House, the Democrats‍ control the Senate, and they⁣ want to take the ⁤Supreme ⁢Court back via any ⁣means short of outright court-packing, which they ⁢lack the swing votes (i.e., Sens. Joe Manchin of⁤ West Virginia ⁤and Kyrsten Sinema of ‌Arizona) to pull off.

Furthermore, ever ⁣since Thomas refused to let himself be torpedoed like Robert ​Bork during his⁣ 1991 confirmation hearings — where flimsy, unsupported charges of ​sexual harassment⁢ were the fodder used to try and keep ‍a bona fide ​conservative off of the ‌high bench — the left has ⁣had it out for him. Before it was the “billionaire donor” ⁤rigamarole,⁣ it was a #MeToo-era re-pillorying of Thomas over his confirmation testimony. The tactics may change, ‌but the fear and loathing of Thomas from the left never will.

If ⁣the Democrats don’t have the votes to court-pack, they also don’t have ⁢the⁢ votes to impeach and oust⁢ Thomas. Mind ‌you, they can throw a lot of mud and try to delegitimize his tenure on the⁢ court. Perhaps the Democrats feel that if they create enough smoke, the 75-year-old Thomas will get⁢ tired of it and retire.

However, one look ⁣back to his ‍ 1991 confirmation hearing — a process ​where he called the⁣ allegations against him “a high-tech lynching” — should throw cold water on that notion. It ‍came after GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch of‌ Utah asked whether ‍or‍ not Thomas​ was going to​ bow out⁤ of the process after Anita Hill’s allegations of sexual harassment:

“I’d rather die than withdraw,” Thomas said. “If‍ they’re going to ⁣kill me, they’re going to kill‌ me.”

“So you would still like ‌to ​serve ‌on the Supreme Court?” Hatch​ asked.

“I’d‌ rather die than withdraw from the process,” ⁣Thomas⁣ said.

“Not for ⁢the purpose of serving on ⁣the Supreme Court, but for the purpose of ‌not being driven out of this process.”

He went on to say — ‌as then-Senate Judiciary Committee ​Chairman Sen. Joe Biden (D-Delaware; later D-MBNA ⁣ and ⁣ D-Burisma) looked on — that he would “not be ⁣scared” ⁤by leftist smear tactics.

Do you support Clarence‌ Thomas?

function ffp_getCookie(cname) {
var name = cname + “=”;
var decodedCookie ⁣= decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
var ca = decodedCookie.split(‘;’);
for(var i = 0; i

“I don’t like ⁢bullies,” Thomas said. “I’ve never run from bullies. ‍I never cry ‘uncle,’ and I’m not going to cry ‘uncle’ today, whether I want to be on the Supreme Court or not.”

So, are ⁢the ⁢Democrats really⁢ under the impression that‍ the latest smear tactic against Thomas⁢ is going ​to work?

I​ assume⁣ for many of them, just the mere‍ act ⁣of trying is ‌enough. It ‍gets people’s minds off of their corrupt president via a claim that‍ Thomas is ‌corrupt. ⁤Again, ​they have no problems with shady deals with billionaires when‍ it​ comes to ⁤the Biden‌ family, but another ProPublica report that Clarence Thomas ‍accepted gifts from ‌friends and watch them shriek⁣ hysterically about how our⁤ politics are bought.

They ‍don’t have⁢ the votes or the evidence to do ⁣anything about it,⁤ though — and,⁢ as Thomas noted ‌in the ⁤clip, he’d likely rather‌ die than be​ hounded from office by ⁢mud-slinging ⁢opportunists.

The post ​ Democrats Who Think They Can Run Clarence‌ Thomas Off the Supreme Court Should Watch This Video from His 1991⁢ Confirmation Hearing ​appeared first ⁤on The Western Journal.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker