The federalist

Dems Pushing A New Version Of The Old Russia Collusion Hoax

The Biden administration recently⁣ announced that ⁣the Justice Department is taking action against alleged Kremlin-controlled websites​ and Russian state media employees, as part of a broader effort to combat Russian ‍misinformation ahead of the elections. Critics‍ raise concerns ⁢about the timing of this ​announcement, occurring just as voting begins in some states, suggesting it aims to portray ​former⁤ President Trump and his supporters as linked to a foreign adversary, thus undermining the integrity of their support. This has been characterized as a form‍ of election meddling by the DOJ itself, which has a policy ​against such actions that could influence electoral outcomes.

The piece​ critiques past instances when Democrats have accused Trump of colluding with Russia, including claims that ‌were ⁤sparked by ⁣the‍ discredited Steele dossier and led ⁣to extensive investigations, ‍such ⁣as the Mueller investigation, which ultimately found no⁤ evidence of collusion. It also highlights how the⁢ intelligence community reportedly interfered in the 2020 election by suppressing⁢ information about​ Hunter Biden, which was dismissed as Russian disinformation despite its authenticity.

The latest indictment involves two RT employees accused​ of conducting a “malign influence operation,” financing a Tennessee-based ⁣media company and influencing right-leaning commentators without disclosing their state-backed funding. The overall assertion of the⁢ article is that these repeated allegations against Trump and‌ associated figures ⁤reflect a strategy of political maneuvering by Democrats, deemed by critics as a more significant form of election interference than any alleged actions​ from Russia.


The Biden administration’s announcement this week that the Justice Department is taking action against alleged Kremlin-run websites and Russian state media employees as part of an effort to  crack down on Russian “misinformation” ahead of the election should raise red flags — huge, obvious red flags.

The biggest red flag is the timing of the indictment and accompanying announcement, just as Americans in some states begin voting. The only possible reason for the DOJ to announce this now, and to frame it as a Russian election meddling scheme designed to boost former President Donald Trump, is to paint Trump and his supporters as agents of a hostile foreign power, or at the very least to imply that Trump’s support is fake, paid for by Moscow.

In other words, the timing of the indictment itself represents an egregious form of election meddling by our own Justice Department, whose own longstanding policy is not to file indictments that could potentially influence an election. Yet that’s the entire purpose of the indictment announced this week.

We’ve seen this playbook before from Democrats. Hand-waving about “Russian disinformation” and “election interference” by the DOJ and the U.S. intelligence community is of course a well-worn election interference tactic — and arguably a far more potent than anything that’s ever come from Moscow.

First it was the outlandish claim in 2016 that Donald Trump was actually a secret Russian agent and that he colluded with Moscow to win the White House. An entire FBI investigation was based on the discredited and patently ridiculous Steele dossier. The initial election meddling allegation was based on nothing more than $100,000 or so in Facebook ads purchased by Russian entities with the aim of sowing division among the American electorate. And from that thin reed, an entire narrative emerged that Russia not only meddled in our election but that Trump colluded with Moscow in the effort.

The entire U.S. intelligence community was mobilized first against Trump’s campaign and then against his administration in what amounted to an Executive Branch rebellion against the duly elected president of the United States. For years, outlandish claims of Trump-Russia collusion hobbled the Trump White House before eventually fizzling out with the denouement of the Mueller investigation, which turned up zero evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

But Democrats and the deep state didn’t give up. Desperate to pry Trump out of office in 2020, the FBI and the intelligence community interfered in our elections yet again. First, they prepped social media companies like Facebook and Twitter that any negative stories about Hunter Biden in the runup to the election should be considered Russian disinformation or obtained via illegal hacking. When the New York Post broke the news of Hunter Biden laptop in October 2020, the big social media companies did as they had been told and throttled the story.

Not only that, but dozens of “former” intelligence officials (coordinated and cajoled by none other than the current secretary of state, Anthony Blinken) issued an open letter claiming the Hunter Biden story had “all the hallmarks” of a Kremlin disinformation operation — even though the CIA and FBI knew at the time, and had known for over a year, that the laptop and its contents were authentic.

Now they’re back with a warmed-over version of the same tired tactic. Call it the Russia collusion hoax 3.0. According to the DOJ indictment, the so-called “malign influence operation” involved two Russian nationals who worked for RT, formerly known as Russia Today, a state-run media outlet. These RT employees allegedly ran a series of “covert projects” that included funneling $10 million to a Tennessee-based company called Tenet Media, which was founded in 2022 by founded by Liam Donovan and his wife, Lauren Chen.

Chen is a right-wing Turning Points USA provocateur of sorts who made videos for The Blaze (which has since cut ties with her) and proffered what were meant to be edgy conservative takes on social media. The scheme they allegedly ran was to fund other right-wing(ish) commentators like Dave Rubin, Tim Pool, and Benny Johnson without disclosing that their company was “funded and directed” by RT. Rubin, Pool, and Johnson all released statements Wednesday insisting they were deceived by Tenet and are victims of this Russia propaganda plot.

In the end, it appears that the scheme wasn’t all that successful. According to the indictment, the RT employees running the scheme grew frustrated that the social media influencers they had paid through Tenet weren’t sharing Tenet’s videos or promoting the company enough. According to Johnson, the contract his lawyers negotiated last year with Tenet was “a standard, arms-length deal, which was later terminated.”

But the details of the indictment aren’t the big takeaway from this story. The big takeaway is the timing of all this. Biden’s DOJ is once again promoting a false narrative of Russian election meddling designed to help Trump, and doing so in the runup to the November election. They want to portray Trump support online as fake, funded and directed by foreign enemies in Moscow, and thereby paint Trump as a Putin lackey — yet again. 

Sorry, but we’ve seen this movie before. Yes, Moscow might have hatched a half-baked scheme to fund right-wing social media influencers without their knowledge, just as Moscow spent $100,000 on Facebook ads in 2016 to sow division. None of it has ever amounted to much, and compared to what our own federal agencies have done, it doesn’t even rate.

The plain truth is that by announcing this indictment now, inserting it into the news cycle, and knowing the corporate media will do its part to portray online Trump support as inauthentic, funded by Russia, Biden’s DOJ is meddling in the election in a far more serious way than Tenet or RT or anyone in Moscow could ever hope to do.


John Daniel Davidson is a senior editor at The Federalist. His writing has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the Claremont Review of Books, The New York Post, and elsewhere. He is the author of Pagan America: the Decline of Christianity and the Dark Age to Come. Follow him on Twitter, @johnddavidson.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker