Dems discuss Trump, ridicule hearing while GOPers highlight mounting Biden impeachment proof.

Engaging Paraphrase of the Text:

In a historic impeachment inquiry hearing held by ​the House of Representatives on September⁣ 28, Democrats, ⁢Republicans, and the four‌ witnesses ⁣found common ground: ​there is currently insufficient evidence to⁤ remove ‍President Joe Biden from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” as mandated by the Constitution.

However, the disagreement arose when it came to determining whether the extensive ⁣evidence presented by ‍Republicans warranted ‍further investigation. Democrats, ‌led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), vehemently⁤ argued ⁤that there was “no ​evidence, no smoke, no gun,” dismissing the thousands of⁢ pages of bank records presented by⁤ Republicans.

During the hearing, Mr. Raskin ⁤stood alongside three Democratic staffers, each ⁤holding a box of documents⁣ containing over 12,000 pages of bank records.

Related Stories

• Biden Impeachment Inquiry Hearing: Rep. ‌Jordan Questions Witness on ‘3 Things’ That Warrant Formal Inquiry
  
  9/28/2023
• Amid Impeachment Inquiry Hearing, House Oversight‌ Committee Shoots Down Motions⁢ to Have Rudy Giuliani Appear
  
  9/28/2023

Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.)⁣ of the​ House Committee on Oversight and⁤ Accountability immediately challenged Mr. ⁢Raskin’s claims. Mr. Comer pointed out that if all the evidence received⁣ so far were placed in boxes ⁤like ⁣the ones presented, they would reach the ceiling of the Rayburn House Office‍ Building, where the hearing took place.

Throughout the ‌six-plus hours of the hearing, Republicans presented⁣ numerous examples‍ from the extensive collection of documents, emails, texts, and memoranda.‍ They ‍argued that these materials illustrated ‌a decade-long pattern of influence-peddling by Hunter Biden, the president’s son, and his associates, ‌who allegedly sold access​ to the “Big Guy” in exchange for at ‌least ‌$24 million from foreign entities ⁣in 23 different countries.

Democrats, on the other hand, repeatedly dismissed the hearing as a futile exercise, with Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) calling it a collection of “baseless allegations and ‍facts that just ‌don’t exist.” They also insisted on subpoenaing former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a close confidante of former President Donald​ Trump, as he was the source of the allegations against the Bidens.

Witness Testimonies

During the hearing, motions were made⁢ by Mr. Raskin and⁢ Rep. Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.) to subpoena Mr. Giuliani⁣ and his former business partner, Lev Parnas. However, both​ motions⁣ were defeated along party lines. Democrats‌ repeatedly referred to a letter from ‍Mr. Parnas, claiming that the allegations had no substance.

One notable moment came when Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) cross-examined a witness, mockingly substituting “Biden” for “Trump” in sentences describing past policies. This drew attention to the contrasting approaches of the two parties. While Democrats focused on President Trump, Republicans delved ​into an organizational chart produced by IRS investigators, which revealed Hunter Biden’s business practices and‌ allegations of tax evasion.

Rep. Lisa McLain (R-Mich.) highlighted Vice President Biden’s involvement in U.S. anti-corruption efforts in Romania,‍ pointing out financial transactions involving​ the Biden family and a corrupt Russian oligarch. Meanwhile, Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) ‍accused committee Republicans of wasting time on a campaign strategy to ⁢benefit Donald Trump.

Throughout the hearing,⁣ witnesses provided differing opinions. Former Assistant ⁢Attorney General Eileen O’Connor and George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley agreed that there was enough evidence to justify the impeachment inquiry, while Mr.​ Dubinski disagreed.

How did Democrats respond‍ to the allegations against Hunter Biden and the evidence presented⁣ by ⁣Republicans?

Edly emphasized that there is‌ no direct evidence linking President Biden to any ‍wrongdoing. They⁢ argued that the allegations against Hunter Biden were baseless⁣ and politically motivated, aimed at⁣ undermining the president’s ⁤credibility.

The House of Representatives held a significant ⁣impeachment inquiry hearing on September 28th, where both ⁢Democrats and Republicans, along with the four witnesses, agreed that​ there was currently insufficient evidence to remove ⁤President Joe Biden⁤ from office for ​any high crimes and misdemeanors‍ as stated in the Constitution. ​However, ⁤the disagreement arose ‍when it⁢ came⁢ to further investigation of the extensive evidence presented⁢ by ​Republicans. The Democrats, led by Ranking⁤ Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), vehemently dismissed the⁢ evidence, claiming there⁣ was no smoke, no gun, and disregarding the ⁣thousands of pages of bank​ records presented by Republicans.

During the hearing, Mr. Raskin appeared with three Democratic staffers, each holding a⁢ box of documents containing over⁤ 12,000 pages of bank records.

Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) of the⁣ House Committee‌ on Oversight and Accountability immediately challenged Mr. Raskin’s claims. He pointed ⁣out ⁢that ⁤if all the evidence received so far‍ were placed in boxes like the ones ‍presented, they would reach the ceiling of the Rayburn House Office Building, where the hearing took place.

Throughout the six-plus hours of the hearing, Republicans provided numerous examples from ‍a vast ⁣collection⁢ of documents, emails, ‌texts, and memoranda. They argued that these materials ‍demonstrated a decade-long pattern of influence-peddling by Hunter Biden and his associates. Allegedly, they ⁣sold ⁤access to the “Big‌ Guy” in exchange for at least $24 million from ⁣foreign entities in 23 different ‌countries.

Democrats, ⁤on the other hand, consistently emphasized ‌that there is no direct evidence connecting President Biden to any ⁤wrongdoing. They ⁤dismissed the allegations against Hunter Biden as ⁣unfounded and ⁣politically motivated, aimed at undermining the president’s credibility.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases