Disney’s latest Christmas film inappropriately portrays children in a sexual manner
Disney is shamelessly sexualizing children and promoting LGBT identification in a TV-PG family movie centered around Christmas.
In the recently released film “The Naughty Nine,” Disney takes it a step further by depicting a lead female character’s home where her four siblings are opening gifts around a Christmas tree. One child refers to another as “Dad,” and we see two men standing together, one with his arm around the other in an intimate manner. They are later referred to as “Dads,” leaving no doubt about their relationship.
But that’s not all. In another scene, a character named Jon Anthony, played by Deric McCabe, who exhibits gay mannerisms, is seen selling clothing under his own designer label. He even uses suggestive language when referring to another male as a ”hottie.”
This is a new low for Hollywood’s Christmas movies. Disney is crossing boundaries and blurring the lines of acceptable behavior for children. It’s not just about portraying “two dads” as normal, but also about introducing sexually charged language and themes to young viewers.
Furthermore, the movie creates a questionable dynamic between Jon, who may be a teenager, and the lead character Andy, who is a
What is the responsibility of entertainment companies like Disney in respecting and representing the diversity of their audience while also being mindful of age appropriateness
Th his arm around the other, implying a romantic relationship. This not only exposes young minds to mature themes but also pushes an agenda that may not align with the values and beliefs of many families.
Childhood is a time of innocence and wonder, where children should be allowed to explore their imaginations and learn about the world in a safe and age-appropriate manner. However, it seems that Disney is increasingly blurring the lines between what is suitable for children and what is not. By inserting adult themes and promoting LGBT representation in a family movie, they are robbing children of their innocence and exposing them to concepts that they may not yet be ready to understand.
The argument could be made that Disney is simply reflecting the diversity of our society and attempting to be inclusive. While inclusivity is an important value to promote, it can be done in a way that is more respectful and considerate of different beliefs and cultural norms. By promoting LGBT identification in a movie targeted towards children, Disney is disregarding the wishes of parents who may hold different views and are seeking to raise their children according to their own values.
It is not the responsibility of entertainment companies like Disney to dictate what values families should adopt or how they should raise their children. Rather, it is their duty to provide content that respects and represents the diversity of their audience while also being mindful of age appropriateness. By pushing an agenda that may be controversial or contradictory to certain belief systems, Disney is overstepping this boundary and alienating a portion of their loyal fan base.
Furthermore, the sexualization of children is an extremely concerning issue that should not be taken lightly. Children should be allowed to grow and develop in an environment that protects and nurtures their innocence. By introducing mature themes and imagery into children’s movies, Disney is contributing to the growing problem of the premature sexualization of young minds.
In conclusion, Disney’s decision to sexualize children and promote LGBT identification in a family movie centered around Christmas is a step in the wrong direction. It not only disregards the wishes and beliefs of many families but also exposes young minds to mature themes they may not yet be ready to understand. It is crucial for entertainment companies to respect the innocence of childhood and be mindful of the impact their content can have on impressionable minds.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...